Cited by 387

Metabolism of nicotine to cotinine studied by a dual stable isotope method

Benowitz, Neal L, Jacob, Peyton·1994·Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Abstract

Objectives (1) To determine the disposition kinetics of nicotine and cotinine, including the fractional conversion of nicotine to cotinine, (2) to compare the disposition kinetics of deuterium-labeled and unlabeled cotinine, and (3) to develop a pharmacokinetically based method for estimating daily intake of nicotine from cigarette smoking. Study design Twenty cigarette smokers received a combined infusion of deuterium-labeled nicotine (d2) and cotinine (d4). Six nonsmokers received a combined infusion of unlabeled cotinine, cotinine-d2 and cotinine-d4. Daily intake of nicotine was estimated with use of the plasma cotinine concentration during ad libitum smoking, clearance of labeled cotinine, and fractional conversion of nicotine to cotinine. Results The kinetics of labeled versus unlabeled cotinine and of cotinine in smokers versus nonsmokers were similar. On average, 72% of nicotine was converted to cotinine, with a range from 55% to 92%. Subjects with lower clearances of nicotine had lower fractional conversion of nicotine to cotinine, indicating that this is the most rapid of the proximate metabolic pathways for nicotine. The equation for estimating daily intake of nicotine from smoking was: Dnic (mg/24 hr) = K x (Plasma Cot) (ng/ml), where K averaged 0.08, with a range from 0.047 to 0.102. Individual variability in the clearance of cotinine (coefficient of variation, 27.5%) accounts for more of the variability in K than does variability in the fractional conversion of n…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.1994.169

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benowitz, N. L., & Jacob, P.
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-11
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
483-493
ISSN
  • 0009-9236
  • 1532-6535
Cited by
387
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review