Cited by 307Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSmoking Behavior and CessationInfant Development and Preterm Care

Smoking during pregnancy and newborn neurobehavior

Law, Karen L., Stroud, Laura R., LaGasse, Linda L., Niaura, Raymond, Liu, Jing, Lester, Barry M.·2003·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This was a prospective study of the effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on newborn neurobehavior, including dose-response relationships using self-report and a bioassay of nicotine exposure. METHODS: The sample included 27 nicotine exposed and 29 unexposed full-term newborn infants with no medical problems from comparable social class backgrounds. Mothers were excluded for using illegal drugs during pregnancy, using antidepressant medication, or if they consumed >3 alcoholic drinks per month. Nicotine exposure was determined by maternal self-report and cotinine in maternal saliva. The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) was administered by masked examiners in hospital to measure neurobehavioral function. NNNS scores were compared between nicotine-exposed and -unexposed groups including adjustment for covariates. Dose-response relationships with NNNS scores were computed for maternal salivary cotinine and maternal report of number of cigarettes per day during pregnancy. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, the tobacco-exposed infants were more excitable and hypertonic, required more handling and showed more stress/abstinence signs, specifically in the central nervous system (CNS), gastrointestinal, and visual areas. Dose-response relationships showed higher maternal salivary cotinine values related to more stress/abstinence signs (r =.530) including CNS (r =.532) and visual stress (r =.688) and higher excitability scores (r =.617). Cigarettes per day during pregnancy was related to more stress/abstinence signs (r =.582) including CNS (r =.561) and visual stress (r =.640). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest neurotoxic effects of prenatal tobacco exposure on newborn neurobehavior. Dose-response relationships could indicate neonatal withdrawal from nicotine. Research directed at understanding the effects of cigarette smoking during pregnancy on infants can lead to improved public health outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.111.6.1318

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tobacco-exposed neonates show more abstinence/withdrawal signs, hypertonicity, irritability, and excitability, with a dose-response relationship to nicotine exposure.

    “studies of the immediate neonatal period (postnatal days 1-5) revealed increased signs of abstinence/withdrawal, hypertonicity, irritability, and excitability in tobacco-exposed neonates, with a clear dose-response relationship to nicotine exposure.”
  • After adjustment for significant covariates, tobacco-exposed infants in the prior study were more excitable than unexposed infants.

    “After adjustment for significant covariates, tobacco-exposed infants were more excitable, hypertonic, and required more handling compared with unexposed infants.”
  • After adjustment for significant covariates, tobacco-exposed infants in the prior study required more handling than unexposed infants.

    “After adjustment for significant covariates, tobacco-exposed infants were more excitable, hypertonic, and required more handling compared with unexposed infants.”
  • After adjustment for significant covariates, tobacco-exposed infants in the prior study were more hypertonic than unexposed infants.

    “After adjustment for significant covariates, tobacco-exposed infants were more excitable, hypertonic, and required more handling compared with unexposed infants.”
  • No significant group differences emerged for stress/abstinence or hypertonicity scales at 10-27 days, unlike results from the immediate newborn period.

    “Unlike results from the immediate newborn period,11 no significant group differences emerged for stress/abstinence or hypertonicity scales.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Law, K. L., Stroud, L. R., LaGasse, L. L., Niaura, R., Liu, J., & Lester, B. M.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
111
Issue
6
Pages
1318-1323
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2134846589
Cited by
307
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50 CA84719, P50CA084719)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
smoking during pregnancy, prenatal nicotine exposure, NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale, salivary cotinine, dose-response relationship, neonatal abstinence syndrome, excitability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System, Child Development, Cotinine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Mothers, Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, Nicotine, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Prospective Studies, Saliva, Self Disclosure, Smoking, Infant Behavior, Maternal Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review