Cited by 18Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

A Population-Based Assessment of the Drug Interaction Between Levothyroxine and Warfarin

Open access
Pincus, D, Gomes, T, Hellings, C, Zheng, H, Paterson, J M, Mamdani, M M, Juurlink, D N·2012·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Most drug interaction resources suggest that levothyroxine can dramatically potentiate the effect of warfarin. However, the mechanistic basis of the interaction is speculative, and little evidence supports a meaningful drug interaction. We conducted a population-based nested case-control study to examine the risk of hospitalization for hemorrhage following the initiation of levothyroxine in a cohort of 260,076 older patients receiving warfarin. In this group, we identified 10,532 case subjects hospitalized for hemorrhage and 40,595 controls. In the primary analysis, we found no association between hospitalization for hemorrhage during warfarin therapy and initiation of levothyroxine in the preceding 30 days (adjusted odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.67-1.86). Secondary analyses using more remote initiation of levothyroxine also found no association. These findings suggest that concerns about a clinically meaningful levothyroxine-warfarin drug interaction are not justified. Drug interaction resources that presently characterize this interaction as important should reevaluate this classification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.2012.171

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pincus, D., Gomes, T., Hellings, C., Zheng, H., Paterson, J. M., Mamdani, M. M., & Juurlink, D. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Juurlink, D N
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-24
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
766-770
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2086349371
Cited by
18
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (92247_1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
levothyroxine, warfarin, drug interactions, hemorrhage, anticoagulation, hospitalization, elderly patients, thyroid hormones, bleeding risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Drug Interactions, Female, Hemorrhage, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Population, Thyroxine, Warfarin, Cohort Studies, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review