Cited by 1,160Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food interactions

Holbrook, Anne M.·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Warfarin is a highly efficacious oral anticoagulant, but its use is limited by a well-founded fear of bleeding. Drug and food interactions are frequently cited as causes of adverse events with warfarin. We provide an updated systematic overview of the quality, clinical effect, and importance of these reported interactions. Data sources MEDLINE, TOXLINE, IPA, and EMBASE databases from October 1993 to March 2004. Database searches combined the keyword warfarin with drug interactions, herbal medicines, Chinese herbal drugs, and food-drug interactions. Study selection Eligible articles contained original reports of warfarin drug or food interactions in human subjects. Non-English articles were included if sufficient information could be abstracted. Data extraction Reports were rated independently by 2 investigators for interaction direction, clinical severity, and quality of evidence. Quality of evidence was based on previously validated causation criteria and study design. Data synthesis Of 642 citations retrieved, 181 eligible articles contained original reports on 120 drugs or foods. Inter-rater agreement was excellent, with weighted kappa values of 0.84 to 1.00. Of all reports, 72% described a potentiation of warfarin's effect and 84% were of poor quality, 86% of which were single case reports. The 31 incidents of clinically significant bleeding were all single case reports. Newly reported interactions included celecoxib, rofecoxib, and herbal substances, such as g…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.10.1095

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holbrook, A. M.
Affiliations
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
Corresponding author
Holbrook, Anne M.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-05-23
Volume
165
Issue
10
Pages
1095
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156687558
Cited by
1,160
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 84
FWCI
29.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
warfarin, drug interactions, food-drug interactions, oral anticoagulants, bleeding risk, herbal medicine, Chinese herbal medicine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, COX-2 inhibitors, macrolides, quinolones, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, omeprazole, amiodarone, 5-fluorouracil, lipid-lowering drugs, green tea, Salvia miltiorrhiza, quality of evidence
MeSH terms
Anticoagulants, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Warfarin, Food-Drug Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review