Cited by 25Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The need for translational research on drug-drug interactions

Open access
Hennessy, S, Flockhart, D A·2012·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are an important clinical and public health concern. Although DDI screening now occurs during drug development, it is difficult to predict clinical importance based on in vitro experiments. Furthermore, older drugs that were not screened may have interactions that have not yet been identified. In this Commentary, we review the importance of DDIs and argue that a translational research approach is needed to produce clinically actionable information as well as generalizable biological knowledge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.2012.39

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because controlled clinical interaction studies remain rare, detecting safety signals for berberine-drug pairs depends, in practice, on spontaneous reporting and disproportionality analyses in pharmacovigilance databases.

    “Because controlled clinical interaction studies remain rare, detecting safety signals for berberine–drug pairs depends, in practice, on spontaneous reporting and disproportionality analyses in pharmacovigilance databases, which underscores the importance of structured recording of supplement use [91,119].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [119]

    In “The clinical and public health importance of drug-drug interactions” (page not available), the paper says few hypothesized interactions have been studied thoroughly. In “The need for translational research on drug-drug interactions” (page not available), it identifies spontaneous-report mining as one way to investigate interactions, but treats it as complementary to other approaches and rarely definitive. It does not address berberine–drug pairs or establish that signal detection depends on disproportionality analyses. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Under-reporting to pharmacovigilance systems pushes the other way, and the paper cannot say which of the two (publication bias vs under-reporting) dominates.

    “Under-reporting to pharmacovigilance systems pushes the other way, and we cannot say which of the two dominates [91,119].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [119]

    The section on translational research discusses limitations of spontaneous adverse-event reports, including an assumption about whether concomitant medications influence reporting. It does not address under-reporting pushing against publication bias or compare which effect dominates (searched: under-reporting, publication bias, spontaneous reports). (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hennessy, S., & Flockhart, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Hennessy, S
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
771-773
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2055162590
Cited by
25
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • PMC
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2kl2rr024132-06)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG025152, RC1AG035751)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008425, T32 GM 08425)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK102694)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2-RR024132)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD063094, U54HD071598, T32HD069047)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
drug-drug interactions, translational research, clinical pharmacology, drug safety
MeSH terms
Clopidogrel, Female, Humans, Male, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Pyridines, Ticlopidine, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review