Cited by 46Nausea and vomiting managementPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Equivalent Dynamic Human Brain NK1-Receptor Occupancy Following Single-Dose i.v. Fosaprepitant vs. Oral Aprepitant as Assessed by PET Imaging

Van Laere, K, De Hoon, J, Bormans, G, Koole, M, Derdelinckx, I, De Lepeleire, I, Declercq, R, Sanabria Bohorquez, S M +14 more·2012·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

The type 1 neurokinin receptor (NK1R) antagonist aprepitant and its i.v. prodrug fosaprepitant have been approved for prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy. This study evaluated the magnitude and duration of brain NK1R occupancy over a period of 5 days after single-dose i.v. infusion of 150-mg fosaprepitant and single-dose oral administration of 165-mg aprepitant, using serial [(18)F]MK-0999 positron emission tomography (PET) in 16 healthy subjects. Each subject underwent three scans. Brain NK1R occupancy rates after i.v. fosaprepitant at time to peak concentration (T(max); ~30 min), 24, 48, and 120 h after the dose were 100, 100, ≥97, and 41-75%, respectively. After aprepitant, NK1R occupancy rates at these time points (T(max) ~4 h) were ≥99, ≥99, ≥97, and 37-76%, respectively. Aprepitant plasma concentration profiles were comparable for the two dosage forms. The study illustrates the utility of PET imaging in determining central bioequivalence in a limited number of subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.2012.62

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Laere, K., De Hoon, J., Bormans, G., Koole, M., Derdelinckx, I., De Lepeleire, I., Declercq, R., Sanabria Bohorquez, S. M., Hamill, T., Mozley, P. D., Tatosian, D., Xie, W., Liu, Y., Liu, F., Zappacosta, P., Mahon, C., Butterfield, K. L., Rosen, L. B., Murphy, M. G., Hargreaves, R. J., Wagner, J. A., & Shadle, C. R.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • MSD (Belgium) (BE)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-27
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
243-250
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2085381828
Cited by
46
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
fosaprepitant, aprepitant, neurokinin receptor antagonists, brain receptor binding, prodrugs, oral versus intravenous administration, nausea and vomiting prevention, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, positron emission tomography
MeSH terms
Aprepitant, Adult, Antiemetics, Antineoplastic Agents, Brain, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Morpholines, Nausea, Prodrugs, Therapeutic Equivalency, Vomiting, Receptors, Neurokinin-1, Positron-Emission Tomography, Young Adult, Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review