Cited by 13Computational Drug Discovery MethodsScience, Research, and MedicineProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Novel drug targets in 2020

Avram, Sorin, Halip, Liliana, Curpan, Ramona, Oprea, Tudor I.·2021·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41573-021-00057-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis of novel MoA drug targets published annually in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery with data pulled from DrugCentral shows, on average, an enrichment rate of 15 novel drug targets per year.

    “The analysis of novel MoA drug targets (targets that an approved drug had not previously perturbed) published annually in the Nature Reviews Drug Discovery series (33,34,41,42) with data pulled from DrugCentral, shows, on average, an enrichment rate of 15 novel drug targets per year”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avram, S., Halip, L., Curpan, R., & Oprea, T. I.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Oprea, Tudor I.
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2021-04-06
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
333-333
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W3140107645
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Science, Research, and Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
therapeutic target, drug target identification, drug discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review