How to make replication the norm
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies have documented severe shortcomings in the state of computational reproducibility across fields including psychology, economics, medicine, political science, life sciences, geoscience, and computer science.
“recent studies have documented severe shortcomings in the state of computational reproducibility across fields including psychology (Hardwicke et al., 2021; Obels et al., 2020; Hardwicke et al., 2018), economics (Gertler et al., 2018; McCullough et al., 2006), medicine (Naudet et al., 2018), political science (Stockemer et al., 2018), life sciences (Andrew et al., 2015; Gilbert et al., 2012; Ioann”
From CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark (2024) · cites this paper as Gertler et al., 2018
Cites
Promoting an open research culture
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab2374 · Cited by 2,708 · see citing works
Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say 'Usually Not'
Chang, A. C., & Li, P. (2015) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2669564 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Davey, C., Aiken, A. M., Hayes, R. J., & Hargreaves, J. R. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv128 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Identification of and correction for publication bias
Andrews, I., & Kasy, M. (2019) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180310 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Smithers, L. G., Sawyer, A. C. P., Chittleborough, C. R., Davies, N. M., Davey Smith, G., & Lynch, J. W. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0461-x · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Mangul, S., Mosqueiro, T., Abdill, R. J., Duong, D., Mitchell, K., Sarwal, V., Hill, B., Brito, J., Littman, R. J., Statz, B., et al. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000333 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Liu, D. M., & Salganik, M. J. (2019) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023119849803 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Siegel, Z. S., Kapoor, S., Nadgir, N., Stroebl, B., & Narayanan, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.11363 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…of computational reproducibility across fields including psychology (Hardwicke et al., 2021; Obels et al., 2020; Hardwicke et al., 2018), economics (Gertler et al., 2018; McCullough et al., 2006), medicine (Naudet et al., 2018), political science (Stockemer et al., 2018), life sciences (Andrew et…”
- Authors
- Gertler, P., Galiani, S., & Romero, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gertler, Paul
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-02-21
- Volume
- 554
- Issue
- 7693
- Pages
- 417-419
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2791930863
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 55.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- replication study, economics journals, scholarly communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
