PreprintCited by 217Research Data Management PracticesScientific Computing and Data ManagementAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say 'Usually Not'

Open access
Chang, Andrew C., Li, Phillip·2015·Finance and Economics Discussion Series

Abstract

We attempt to replicate 67 papers published in 13 well-regarded economics journals using author-provided replication files that include both data and code. Some journals in our sample require data and code replication files, and other journals do not require such files. Aside from 6 papers that use confidential data, we obtain data and code replication files for 29 of 35 papers (83%) that are required to provide such files as a condition of publication, compared to 11 of 26 papers (42%) that are not required to provide data and code replication files. We successfully replicate the key qualitative result of 22 of 67 papers (33%) without contacting the authors. Excluding the 6 papers that use confidential data and the 2 papers that use software we do not possess, we replicate 29 of 59 papers (49%) with assistance from the authors. Because we are able to replicate less than half of the papers in our sample even with help from the authors, we assert that economics research is usually not replicable. We conclude with recommendations on improving replication of economics research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2669564

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bernanke, Ben S., "Editorial Statement," American Economic Review 94:1 (2004), 404.
  2. Card, David, and Alan B. Krueger, "Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania," American Economic Review 84:4 (1994), 772-793.
  3. Thompson Reuters' Web of Science Journal Citation Reports: Social Science Edition. https://isiknowledge.com/ (2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, A. C., & Li, P.
Affiliations
  • Federal Reserve (US)
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (US)
Venue
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015
Volume
2015.0
Issue
83
Pages
1-26
ISSN
1936-2854 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2195775529
Cited by
217
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 5
FWCI
80.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Finance and Economics Discussion Series (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
research reproducibility, open data policy, economics journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review