The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Australian gene-editing rules adopt ‘middle ground
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CRISPR/Cas functions as an adaptive immune defense in bacteria, safeguarding their genomic DNA from viral (phage) attacks by degrading the DNA with the help of RNA guidance and the Cas9 protein.
“CRISPR/Cas functions as an adaptive immune defense in bacteria, safeguarding their genomic DNA from viral (phage) attacks by degrading the DNA with the help of RNA guidance and the Cas9 protein (Mallapaty, 2019; Li et al., 2020a).”
From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Mallapaty, 2019
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genome Edited Crops Touch the Market: A View on the Global Development and Regulatory Environment
Menz, J., Modrzejewski, D., Hartung, F., Wilhelm, R., & Sprink, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.586027 · Cited by 275
Genome editing with the CRISPR‐Cas system: an art, ethics and global regulatory perspective
Zhang, D., Hussain, A., Manghwar, H., Xie, K., Xie, S., Zhao, S., Larkin, R. M., Qing, P., Jin, S., & Ding, F. (2020) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13383 · Cited by 254
Next‐generation biological control: the need for integrating genetics and genomics
Leung, K., Ras, E., Ferguson, K., Ariëns, S., Babendreier, D., Bijma, P., Bourtzis, K., Jacques Brodeur, B., Bruins, M. A., Centurión, A., et al. (2020) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12641 · Cited by 157
Precision fermentation to advance fungal food fermentations
Chai, K. F., Ng, K. R., Samarasiri, M. H., & Chen, W. N. (2022) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100881 · Cited by 137
Challenges and Perspectives in Homology-Directed Gene Targeting in Monocot Plants
Vu, T. V., Sung, Y. W., Kim, J., Tran, M. T., Tran, M. T., & Kim, J. (2019) · Rice · doi:10.1186/s12284-019-0355-1 · Cited by 83
Regulatory Status of Genome-Edited Organisms Under the Japanese Cartagena Act
Tsuda, M., Watanabe, K., & Ohsawa, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00387 · Cited by 81
Breaking the impasse: Towards a forward‐looking governance framework for gene editing with plants
Macnaghten, P., & Habets, M. G. J. L. (2020) · Plants People Planet · doi:10.1002/ppp3.10107 · Cited by 80
Highly efficient and genotype-independent barley gene editing based on anther culture
Han, Y., Broughton, S., Liu, L., Zhang, X.-Q., Zeng, J., He, X., & Li, C. (2021) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100082 · Cited by 73
Gatica-Arias, A. (2020) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-020-01799-1 · Cited by 71
Synthetic biology and opportunities within agricultural crops
Sargent, D., Conaty, W. C., Tissue, D. T., & Sharwood, R. E. (2022) · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment · doi:10.1002/sae2.12014 · Cited by 63
CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing for Fruit and Vegetable Crops: Strategies and Prospects
Wan, L., Wang, Z., Tang, M., Hong, D., Sun, Y., Ren, J. M., Zhang, N., & Zeng, H. (2021) · Horticulturae · doi:10.3390/horticulturae7070193 · Cited by 63
Gene drive: progress and prospects
Wedell, N., Price, T. A. R., & Lindholm, A. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2709 · Cited by 51
Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops
Chavhan, R. L., Jaybhaye, S. G., Hinge, V. R., Deshmukh, A. S., Shaikh, U. S., Jadhav, P. K., Kadam, U. S., & Hong, J. C. (2025) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2025.1524767 · Cited by 55
“CRISPR/Cas functions as an adaptive immune defense in bacteria, safeguarding their genomic DNA from viral (phage) attacks by degrading the DNA with the help of RNA guidance and the Cas9 protein (Mallapaty, 2019; Li et al., 2020a).”
Sattar, M. N., Iqbal, Z., Al-Khayri, J. M., & Jain, S. M. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10071347 · Cited by 42
Bullock, D. W., Wilson, W. W., & Neadeau, J. F. (2021) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12201 · Cited by 46
Sharma, S. K., Gupta, O. P., Pathaw, N., Sharma, D., Maibam, A., Sharma, P., Sanasam, J., Karkute, S. G., Kumar, S., & Bhattacharjee, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.751512 · Cited by 43
Genome-editing technologies: the gap between application and policy
Li, G., Liu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2019) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-019-1566-1 · Cited by 38
Improving Horticultural Crops via CRISPR/Cas9: Current Successes and Prospects
Bhatta, B. P., & Malla, S. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9101360 · Cited by 40
Velasco, L., Ruiz, L., Galipienso, L., Rubio, L., & Janssen, D. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10060860 · Cited by 37
Gene Editing Technologies for Sugarcane Improvement: Opportunities and Limitations
Mohan, C., Easterling, M., & Yau, Y. (2021) · Sugar Tech · doi:10.1007/s12355-021-01045-8 · Cited by 36
Yeast bioprospecting versus synthetic biology—which is better for innovative beverage fermentation?
Alperstein, L., Gardner, J. M., Sundstrom, J. F., Sumby, K. M., & Jiranek, V. (2020) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-020-10364-x · Cited by 38
Progress and opportunities through use of genomics in animal production
Jones, H. E., & Wilson, P. (2022) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2022.06.014 · Cited by 42
Regulatory aspects, risk assessment, and toxicity associated with RNAi and CRISPR methods
Ahmad, S., Shahzad, R., Jamil, S., Tabassum, J., Chaudhary, M. A. M., Atif, R. M., Iqbal, M. M., Monsur, M. B., Lv, Y., Sheng, Z., et al. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821910-2.00013-8 · Cited by 36
Martínez-Fortún, J., Phillips, D. W., & Jones, H. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.937853 · Cited by 32
Regulatory Constraints and Differences of Genome-Edited Crops Around the Globe
Hundleby, P. A. C., & Harwood, W. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08072-2_17 · Cited by 30
Current status and prospects of plant genome editing in Australia
Zhang, Y., Restall, J., Crisp, P. A., Godwin, I. D., & Liu, G. (2021) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-021-10188-y · Cited by 28
Public perceptions of potential adaptations for mitigating heat stress on Australian dairy farms
Hendricks, J., Mills, K. E., Sirovica, L. V., Sundermann, L., Bolton, S. E., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2022) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2022-21813 · Cited by 28
Mueller, M. L., Cole, J. B., Connors, N. K., Johnston, D. J., Randhawa, I. A. S., & Eenennaam, A. L. V. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.593154 · Cited by 25
CRISPR-Cas9 Application in Canadian Public and Private Plant Breeding
Gleim, S. W., Lubieniechi, S., & Smyth, S. J. (2020) · The CRISPR Journal · doi:10.1089/crispr.2019.0061 · Cited by 23
Nguyen, T. H., Taieb, S. B., Moritaka, M., Liu, R., & Fukuda, S. (2021) · Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing · doi:10.1080/08974438.2021.2011526 · Cited by 21
Genome Editing in Biotech Regulations Worldwide
Sprink, T., & Wilhelm, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46150-7_25 · Cited by 21
Impacts of growing and utilising genetically modified crops and forages – a New Zealand perspective
Caradus, J. R. (2022) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2022.2077380 · Cited by 17
Ledvinka, H. D., Toghyani, M., Tan, D. K. Y., Khoddami, A., Godwin, I. D., & Liu, S. Y. (2022) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture12111913 · Cited by 15
Next Generation Biological Control: The Need for Integrating Genetics and EvolutionPreprint
Leung, K., Ras, E., Ferguson, K., Ariëns, S., Babendreier, D., Bijma, P., Bourtzis, K., Jacques Brodeur, B., Bruins, M. A., Centurión, A., et al. (2019) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints201911.0300.v1 · Cited by 15
Dry, I. B., Davies, C., Dunlevy, J. D., Smith, H. M. S., Thomas, M. R., Walker, A. R., WALKER, R. R., & Clingeleffer, P. R. (2022) · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · doi:10.1111/ajgw.12552 · Cited by 13
Sharma, V., Thakur, M., Maan, S. S., Verma, K., Thakur, A., & Penna, S. (2024) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-024-11484-8 · Cited by 12
CRISPR-Cas Technology: A Genome-Editing Powerhouse for Molecular Plant Breeding
Mohan, C., Satish, L., Muthubharathi, B. C., Selvarajan, D., Easterling, M., & Yau, Y. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9001-3_32 · Cited by 12
Commercialization and Supervision Policies of Gene Edited Crops in China and Other Main Countries
Wei, X., Pu, A., Liu, Q., Leng, Y., Fu, Z., Wu, F., An, X., & Long, Y. (2021) · ACS Agricultural Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00247 · Cited by 9
Programmed sequential cutting endows Cas9 versatile base substitution capability in plants
Yang, W., Qi, W., Li, Y., Wang, J., Luo, Y., Ding, D., Mo, S., Chen, B., Lu, Y., Li, H., et al. (2020) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-020-1798-4 · Cited by 10
Song, X., Dang, C., Wang, F., Yao, H., Song, Q., & Yè, G. (2026) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2026.2641893 · Cited by 9
Animal Transgenesis and Cloning: Combined Development and Future Perspectives
Yamashita, M., & Melo, E. O. (2023) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3064-8_6 · Cited by 8
van der Berg, J. P., Kleter, G. A., BATTAGLIA, E., Groenen, M. A. M., & KOK, E. J. (2020) · Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering · doi:10.15302/j-fase-2019306 · Cited by 8
Therapeutic gene editing is here, can regulations keep up?
Kannan, S., & Najjar, D. (2020) · MIT Science Policy Review · doi:10.38105/spr.czm9c2w8ig · Cited by 7
Applications of Genome Editing Techniques for the Improvement of Medicinal Plants
Mishra, R., Agarwal, P., & Mohanty, A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-5779-6_22 · Cited by 6
Advancing tree genomics to future proof next generation orchard production
Kerr, S. C., Shehnaz, S., Paudel, L., Manivannan, M. S., Shaw, L. M., Johnson, A. J., Velasquez, J. T. J., Tanurdžić, M., Cazzonelli, C. I., Varkonyi‐Gasic, E., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1321555 · Cited by 5
Enhancing Genetic Efficiency of Natural Enemies of Crop Pests
Gopalkrishna, H. R., Chakravarthy, A. K., & Prasad, H. N. N. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-0264-2_7 · Cited by 5
Murugavelu, G. S., Chandar, S. R. H., Krishna, S. S., Manimekalai, R., Swaminathan, A., & Appunu, C. (2024) · Sugar Tech · doi:10.1007/s12355-024-01448-3 · Cited by 6
Genome editing to re-domesticate and accelerate use of barley crop wild relatives
Hanak, T., Janjić, J., Hay, F. R., & Brinch‐Pedersen, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1331577 · Cited by 4
Policies and Governance for Plant Genome Editing
Schiemann, J., Hartung, F., Menz, J., Sprink, T., & Wilhelm, R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68345-0_18 · Cited by 3
Innovations in Artificial Induction of Plant Genetic Diversity
Sharma, V., Kordrostami, M., Maan, S. S., Sarsu, F., & Penna, S. (2024) · Sustainable development and biodiversity · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-5245-8_8 · Cited by 3
Aerni, P. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68345-0_19 · Cited by 3
Plant Breeding and Intellectual Property: A Controversial Topic
Kock, M. A. (2022) · Law for professionals · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06297-1_1 · Cited by 3
CRISPR/Cas9 regulations in plant science
Fiaz, S., Khan, S. A., Noor, M. A., Ali, H., Ali, N., Alharthi, B., Qayyum, A., & Nadeem, F. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821910-2.00035-7 · Cited by 2
Nutritional Enhancement in Horticultural Crops by CRISPR/Cas9: Status and Future Prospects
Priti, P., Kamboj, D., Chaudhary, V., Baliyan, N., Rani, R., & Jangra, S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15568-0_19 · Cited by 2
Regulations of genome edited plants: notes from editors
Abd-Elsalam, K. A., & Ahmad, A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-18444-4.00007-7 · Cited by 2
Applications of CRISPR/Cas in plants
Batra, B., Gangwar, H., Poonia, A. K., & Gahlaut, V. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-18444-4.00021-1 · Cited by 1
CRISPR-Cas-Based Gene Editing in Barley for Trait Enhancement
Jash, S., Chetri, A., Syed, R., Upadhyay, D. K., & Mandal, S. (2026) · Sustainability Sciences in Asia and Africa · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6722-5_10 · Cited by 1
Implementing Genome Editing in Barley Breeding
Jakobson, L., Öney-Birol, S., & Timofejeva, L. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46150-7_10 · Cited by 1
Genome Improvement for Rust Disease Resistance in Wheat
Mago, R. (2021) · Concepts and strategies in plant sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63372-1_6 · Cited by 1
Vested Interests and Business Diplomacy
Pantoja, Y. I. M. (2021) · Policy Quarterly · doi:10.26686/pq.v17i2.6824
A Peek Behind the Curtain of Anti-aging Science
Lupton, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-2439-4_7
Metadata
- Authors
- Mallapaty, S.
- Corresponding author
- Mallapaty, Smriti
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-04-23
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2940957773
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Keywords
- gene editing regulation, genome editing, genetically modified organisms, regulatory approval, plants, animals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review