Cited by 62CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBiomedical Ethics and RegulationGenetically Modified Organisms Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Australian gene-editing rules adopt ‘middle ground

Mallapaty, Smriti·2019·Nature

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-019-01282-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRISPR/Cas functions as an adaptive immune defense in bacteria, safeguarding their genomic DNA from viral (phage) attacks by degrading the DNA with the help of RNA guidance and the Cas9 protein.

    “CRISPR/Cas functions as an adaptive immune defense in bacteria, safeguarding their genomic DNA from viral (phage) attacks by degrading the DNA with the help of RNA guidance and the Cas9 protein (Mallapaty, 2019; Li et al., 2020a).”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mallapaty, S.
Corresponding author
Mallapaty, Smriti
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-04-23
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2940957773
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
gene editing regulation, genome editing, genetically modified organisms, regulatory approval, plants, animals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review