The future of electronic health records
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Shanafelt, T. D., Hasan, O., Dyrbye, L. N., Sinsky, C., Satele, D., Sloan, J., & West, C. P. (2015) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.023 · Cited by 2,885 · see citing works
Arndt, B. G., Beasley, J. W., Watkinson, M. D., Temte, J. L., Tuan, W.-J., Sinsky, C. A., & Gilchrist, V. J. (2017) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2121 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Volume and value of big healthcare data
Dinov, I. D. (2016) · Journal of Medical Statistics and Informatics · doi:10.7243/2053-7662-4-3 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Shanafelt, T. D. et al. Mayo Clin. Proc. 90, 1600-1613 (2015).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantified electronic health record (EHR) use by academic surgeons
Cox, M. L., Risoli, T., Peskoe, S. B., Turner, D. A., & Migaly, J. (2021) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.009 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Electronic Health Record Usage Patterns Across Surgical Subspecialties
Tang, K., Labagnara, K., Babar, M., Loloi, J., Watts, K. L., Jariwala, S., & Abraham, N. (2024) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/a-2194-1061 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hecht, J.
- Corresponding author
- Hecht, Jeff
- ORCID
- Hecht, Jeff
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-09-25
- Volume
- 573
- Issue
- 7775
- Pages
- S114-S116
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2976272453
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, health information technology, implementation barriers, United States
- MeSH terms
- Humans, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
