Cited by 7Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Electronic Health Record Usage Patterns Across Surgical Subspecialties

Open access
Tang, Kevin, Labagnara, Kevin, Babar, Mustufa, Loloi, Justin, Watts, Kara L., Jariwala, Sunit, Abraham, Nitya·2024·Applied Clinical Informatics

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to utilize metrics from physician action logs to analyze surgeon clinical, volume, electronic health record (EHR) efficiency, EHR proficiency, and workload outside scheduled time as impacted by physician characteristics such as years of experience, gender, subspecialty, academic title, and administrative title. METHODS: We selected 30 metrics from Epic Signal, an analytic tool in Epic that extracts metrics related to clinician documentation. Metrics measuring appointments, messages, and scheduled hours per day were used as a correlate for volume. EHR efficiency, and proficiency were measured by scores built into Epic Signal. Metrics measuring time spent in the EHR outside working hours were used as a correlate for documentation burden. We analyzed these metrics among surgeons at our institution across 4 months and correlated them with physician characteristics. RESULTS: Analysis of 133 surgeons showed that, when stratified by gender, female surgeons had significantly higher EHR metrics for time per day, time per appointment, and documentation burden, and significantly lower EHR metrics for efficiency when compared to male surgeons. When stratified by experience, surgeons with 0 to 5 years of experience had significantly lower EHR metrics for volume, time per day, efficiency, and proficiency when compared to surgeons with 6 to 10 and more than 10 years of experience. On multivariate analysis, having over 10 years of experience was an independent predictor of more appointments per day, greater proficiency, and spending less time per completed message. Female gender was an independent predictor of spending more time in notes per appointment and time spent in the EHR outside working hours. CONCLUSION: The burden associated with volume, proficiency, efficiency, and workload outside scheduled time related to EHR use varies by gender and years of experience in our cohort of surgeons. Evaluation of physician action logs could help identify those at higher risk of burnout due to burdensome medical documentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-2194-1061

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Having 6 to 10 years of experience was an independent predictor of receiving more messages per day.

    “Furthermore, 6 to 10 years of experience was an independent predictor of receiving more messages per day (OR 4.50, 95% CI 0.51, 8.49).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.
    • Rests on an assumption: Years of experience determined from the year of graduation from last residency or fellowship is a valid measure of years practicing as an attending.
  • Findingown data

    Overall, surgeons spent 57.5 minutes per day logged into the EHR.

    “Overall, surgeons spent 57.5 minutes per day logged into the EHR, 19.1 minutes per day in the EHR outside the scheduled hours, and 19.4 minutes per day in the EHR outside the scheduled days.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.
  • Findingown data

    Surgeons with 0 to 5 years of experience had significantly lower EHR efficiency than surgeons with 6 to 10 and >10 years of experience.

    “When stratified by experience, surgeons with 0 to 5 years of experience had significantly lower EHR metrics for volume, time per day, efficiency, and proficiency when compared to surgeons with 6 to 10 and more than 10 years of experience.”
    • Also stated in: § Years of Experience · plain
      “Surgeons with 0 to 5 years of experience had significantly lower EHR metrics for volume, time per day, efficiency, and proficiency when compared to surgeons with 6 to 10 and >10 years of experience.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.
    • Rests on an assumption: Years of experience determined from the year of graduation from last residency or fellowship is a valid measure of years practicing as an attending.
  • Findingown data

    There were no significant differences in EHR metrics of specialty or workload outside scheduled time across years of experience.

    “There were no significant differences in the EHR metrics of specialty or workload outside scheduled time across years of experience (►Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Time spent in the EHR outside working hours is a valid proxy for documentation burden.
    • Rests on an assumption: Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.
    • Rests on an assumption: Years of experience determined from the year of graduation from last residency or fellowship is a valid measure of years practicing as an attending.
  • Findingown data

    All surgeons spent a median of 2.4 minutes in Notes per appointment.

    “All surgeons had a median of 18.6 appointments (13.2-26.5)per day, spent a median of 3.5 minutes (2.0-5.7 min) in in-basket per day, and 2.4 minutes (1.6-4.1 min) in Notes per appointment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    All surgeons had a median pajama time of 10.4 minutes.

    “All surgeons spent a median of 19.4 minutes (11.6-33.6 min) on unscheduled days with a median pajama time of 10.4 minutes (4.5-24.5 min; ►Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Time spent in the EHR outside working hours is a valid proxy for documentation burden.
    • Rests on an assumption: Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Having >10 years of experience was an independent predictor of more scheduled hours per day.

    “>10 years of experience was an independent predictor of more appointments per day (odds ratio [OR] 7.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.30, 13.62) and scheduled hours per day (OR 1.74, 95% CI 0.38, 3.10)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.
    • Rests on an assumption: Years of experience determined from the year of graduation from last residency or fellowship is a valid measure of years practicing as an attending.
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Surgeons with 0 to 5 years of experience had a significantly higher percentage of time in system: ED than those with 6-10 or >10 years (median 0.6% vs 0.1% vs 0.1%, p=0.001).

    “| Percentage of time in system: ED | 0.2 (0.0-1.0) | 0.6 (0.1-1.7) | 0.1 (0.0-0.5) | 0.1 (0.0-0.8) | 0.001 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Female surgeons had significantly more time on unscheduled days than male surgeons (median 23.4 vs 17.2 min, p=0.023).

    “| Time on unscheduled days (min) | 19.4 (11.6-33.6) | 17.2 (10.2-31.4) | 23.4 (15.9-39.6) | 0.023 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Surgeons with 0 to 5 years of experience had significantly more time in in-basket per appointment than those with 6-10 or >10 years (median 0.7 vs 0.6 vs 0.4 min, p=0.008).

    “| Time in in-basket (min) | 0.5 (0.2-1.0) | 0.7 (0.4-1.5) | 0.6 (0.3-1.1) | 0.4 (0.1-0.7) | 0.008 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The gold standard for burnout is the quantitative burnout survey, which was not included in the study.

    “The gold standard for burnout is the quantitative burnout survey, which we did not include in our study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Studying data collected through EHRs can be used to understand how its use is linked to burnout and job satisfaction, and to develop programs that can improve efficiency and reduce the workload associated with documentation.

    “Studying the data collected through EHRs can be used to understand how its use is linked to burnout and job satisfaction, and to develop programs that can improve efficiency and reduce the workload associated with documentation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Time spent in the EHR outside working hours is a valid proxy for documentation burden.
    • Rests on an assumption: Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study did not have any other EHR usage metrics in the system other than Signal to compare and validate the findings.

    “Additionally, we did not have any other EHR usage metrics in our system other than Signal to compare and validate our findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Without universally accepted methodology for measuring proficiency, Epic's algorithm may not factor in various other time-saving methods implemented by physicians.

    “Without universally accepted methodology for measuring proficiency, Epic's algorithm may not factor in various other time-saving methods implemented by physicians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Epic Signal Proficiency Score validly measures EHR proficiency.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Caution should be used when considering the metrics for efficiency and proficiency, as Epic Signal definitions for Proficiency Score have not been extensively used in other studies.

    “Caution should be used when considering our metrics for efficiency and proficiency, as Epic Signal definitions for”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Epic Signal Proficiency Score validly measures EHR proficiency.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, physicians' use of EHR has risen from 9% in 2008 to 96% in 2017.

    “Since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, physicians' use of electronic health records (EHR) has risen from 9% in 2008 to 96% in 2017, primarily due to its use as a requirement for clinicians who seek to receive Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement.1,2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] 1. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 111th Con- gress (2009-2010). Accessed January 3, 2023 at: https://www. congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [2] 2. Hecht J. The future of electronic health records. Nature 2019;573 (7775):S114-S116

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Time spent working outside normal working hours was used as a proxy for burden, but there are many other contributors to burden.

    “Additionally, we used time spent working outside of normal working hours as a proxy for burden, but there are many other contributors to burden, such as lack of autonomy, lack of staff, and personal characteristics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Time spent in the EHR outside working hours is a valid proxy for documentation burden.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Appointments per day did not consider whether a physician had a full or half day at the clinic.

    “Appointments per day did not consider whether a physician had a full or half day at the clinic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Because scheduled time was determined by Epic Signal, the analysis could not stratify based on scheduled time for clinic versus scheduled time for operating room or administrative tasks.

    “Because scheduled time was determined by Epic Signal, we could not stratify our analysis based on scheduled time for clinic versus scheduled time for operating room or administrative tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These findings indicate that while overall workload may increase, physicians are learning to become even more efficient to maintain a balanced lifestyle.

    “These findings indicate that while the overall workload may increase, physicians are learning to become even more efficient to maintain a balanced lifestyle.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.
    • Rests on an assumption: Years of experience determined from the year of graduation from last residency or fellowship is a valid measure of years practicing as an attending.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evidence highlights that women and less experienced clinicians spend more time on the EHR, possibly correlating with more feelings of burnout.

    “Moreover, there is evidence highlighting that women and less experienced clinicians spend more time on the EHR, possibly correlating with more feelings of burnout.16”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] 16. Gupta K, Murray SG, Sarkar U, et al. Differences in ambulatory EHR use patterns for male vs. female physicians. NEJM Catal 2019;5(6)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These studies were limited to the ambulatory setting and lacked an analysis on clinician characteristics, such as age, gender, and experience.

    “However, these studies were limited to the ambulatory setting and lacked an analysis on clinician characteristics, such as age, gender, and experience.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] 16. Gupta K, Murray SG, Sarkar U, et al. Differences in ambulatory EHR use patterns for male vs. female physicians. NEJM Catal 2019;5(6)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

17 of 17
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Time spent in the EHR outside working hours is a valid proxy for documentation burden.

    “Metrics measuring time spent in the EHR outside working hours were used as a correlate for documentation burden.”
    “Additionally, we used time spent working outside of normal working hours as a proxy for burden, but there are many other contributors to burden, such as lack of autonomy, lack of staff, and personal characteristics.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Epic Signal metrics accurately reflect clinicians' EHR usage.

    “Data on surgeon EHR usage were collected using Epic Signal, a software that can extract a variety of clinician outpatient documentation over a specified period in the EHR system Epic.[17][18][19]”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Epic Signal Proficiency Score validly measures EHR proficiency.

    “Proficiency, scaled from 0 to 10, reflects the frequency with which a physician utilizes Epic's integrated efficiency features such as chart search, preference lists, quick action tools, and speed buttons.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Years of experience determined from the year of graduation from last residency or fellowship is a valid measure of years practicing as an attending.

    “Surgeon experience was evaluated as the number of years practicing as an attending, which was determined from the surgeon's year of graduation from their last residency or fellowship.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Urology gender percentages are taken from the surgery row

    Minor

    The stated female and male percentages for urology match the table's Surgery row. The Urology row instead reports 20.5% for female surgeons and 7.4% for male surgeons.

  • Univariate coefficient does not match its confidence interval

    Minor

    For associate professor status and time per completed message, the reported coefficient is 2.00, but the midpoint of its stated 95% confidence interval is −1.995. The other linear-regression intervals in the table are centered on their coefficients.

    Reported 2 · recomputed -1.995

  • Message-time median differs between the figure text and Table 3

    Minor

    For surgeons with 6 to 10 years of experience, the figure text gives a median of 0.4 minutes per completed message, whereas Table 3 gives 0.5 minutes.

  • Study duration is reported as both four and five months

    Minor

    The abstract says the analysis covered four months, while the methods say metrics were collected for five months.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, K., Labagnara, K., Babar, M., Loloi, J., Watts, K. L., Jariwala, S., & Abraham, N.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Babar, Mustufa
Venue
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2023-10-18
Volume
15
Issue
01
Pages
034-044
ISSN
1869-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387735315
Cited by
7
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Clinical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
electronic health records, surgical subspecialties, documentation workload, gender differences, years of experience, surgeon burnout, clinical volume
MeSH terms
Female, Health Facilities, Humans, Male, Time Factors, Workload, Electronic Health Records, Surgeons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review