CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Craft an African American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

Dunnavant, Justin, Justinvil, Delande, Colwell, Chip·2021·Nature
DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-01320-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-021-01320-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This new generation of researchers have renewed pressing questions about the ethical treatment of African American human remains, while bringing attention to systemic forms of anti-Blackness within the discipline.

    “For instance, this new generation of researchers have renewed pressing questions about the ethical treatment of African American human remains (Dunnavant et al. 2021), while bringing attention to systemic forms of anti-Blackness within the discipline (Franklin et al. 2020).”

    From The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration (2023) · cites this paper as Dunnavant et al. 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Harrington, S. P. M. Archaeology 46, 28–39 (1993).
  2. Rainville, L. J. Field Archaeol. 34, 196–206 (2009). · DOI
  3. Blakey, M. L. Transform. Anthropol. 7, 53–58 (1998). · DOI
  4. Davidson, J. M. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 11, 193–220 (2007). · DOI
  5. Rankin-Hill, L. M. In New Directions in Biocultural Anthropology (eds Zuckerman, M. K. & Martin, D. L.) 133–156 (Wiley, 2016). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Berry, D. R. The Price for Their Pound of Flesh (Beacon, 2017).
  7. Nelson, A. The Social Life of DNA (Beacon, 2016).
  8. Clinton, C. K. & Jackson, F. L. C. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24171 (2020). · DOI
  9. Skloot, R. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (Crown, 2010).
  10. Owens, D. C. Medical Bondage (Univ. Georgia Press, 2017). · DOI
  11. Watkins, R. J. In Identified Skeletal Collections (eds Henderson, C. Y. & Cardoso, F. A.) 169–186 (Archaeopress Archaeology, 2018).
  12. Roberts, D. Fatal Invention (New Press, 2012).
  13. TallBear, K. Native American DNA (Univ. Minnesota Press, 2013). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Colwell, C. Plundered Skulls and Stolen Spirits (Univ. Chicago Press, 2017). · DOI
  15. Fox, K. & Hawks, J. Nature 572, 581–583 (2019). · DOI
  16. Blakey, M. L. In Evaluating Multiple Narratives (eds Habu, J., Fawcett, C. & Matsunaga, J. M.) 17–28 (Springer, 2008). · DOI
  17. Watkins, R. J. Hist. Archaeol. 54, 17–33 (2020). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dunnavant, J., Justinvil, D., & Colwell, C.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-05-19
Volume
593
Issue
7859
Pages
337-340
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/d41586-021-01320-4
Cited by
58
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review