Cited by 89Climate Change Policy and EconomicsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesForest Management and Policy

Microsoft’s million-tonne CO2-removal purchase — lessons for net zero

Joppa, Lucas, Luers, Amy, Willmott, Elizabeth, Friedmann, S. Julio, Hamburg, Steven P., Broze, Rafael·2021·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-021-02606-3

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joppa, L., Luers, A., Willmott, E., Friedmann, S. J., Hamburg, S. P., & Broze, R.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Center on Global Energy Policy (US)
  • Environmental Defense Fund (US)
Corresponding author
  • Joppa, Lucas
  • Luers, Amy
Venue
Nature
Published
2021-09-29
Volume
597
Issue
7878
Pages
629-632
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3203807150
Cited by
89
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 1
FWCI
10.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
carbon dioxide removal, Microsoft, net-zero emissions, carbon pricing, emissions trading, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review