Cited by 36Nutritional Studies and DietAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactMeat and Animal Product Quality

Meat consumption after disaggregation of meat dishes in a cohort of British adults in 1989 and 1999 in relation to diet quality

Open access
Prynne, C J, Wagemakers, J J M F, Stephen, A M, Wadsworth, M E J·2009·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objectives The aim of the study was to quantify more precisely the meat intake of a cohort of adults in the UK by disaggregating composite meat dishes.Subjects/methods Subjects were members of the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development, 1946 birth cohort. Five-day diaries were collected from 2256 men and women in 1989 and 1772 men and women in 1999. From the details provided, composite meat dishes were broken down into their constituent parts and the meat fraction was added to meat portions only. Meat intake was classified as red meat, processed meat and poultry.Results Meat consumption without disaggregation of meat dishes resulted in a mean overestimation of 50% in men and 33% in women. Red meat consumption fell between 1989 and 1999 from 51.7 to 41.5 g per day in men and 35.7 to 30.1 g per day in women. Poultry consumption rose from 21.6 to 32.2 g per day in men and 18.2 to 29.4 g per day in women. Re-calculating red meat intakes resulted in the percentage of subjects in 1999 consuming more than the recommendation of the World Cancer Research Fund falling from 30 to 12%. Increasing consumption of red and processed meat was associated with increased intakes of energy, fat, haem iron, zinc and vitamin B(12), and lower intake of fibre. Increased sodium intake was associated with increased consumption of processed meat.Conclusions Disaggregation of meat dishes provided a more precise estimate of meat consumption. The quantity of red or processed meat in the diet was reflected in the nutrient content of the entire diet.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejcn.2008.7

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Food Standards Agency McCance and Widdowson’s, The Composition of Foods 2002 Royal Society of Chemistry Cambridge
  2. Prynne CJ Paul AA Mishra GD Greenberg DC Wadsworth MEJ Changes in intake of key nutrients over 17 years during adult life of a British birth cohort Brit J Nutr 2005 94 368 376 16176607

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prynne, C. J., Wagemakers, J. J. M. F., Stephen, A. M., & Wadsworth, M. E. J.
Affiliations
  • MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory (GB)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Prynne, C J
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2008-02-20
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
660-666
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2071043106
Cited by
36
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
meat consumption, red meat, processed meat, poultry, diet quality, nutrient intake, sodium intake, fibre intake, haem iron, zinc, vitamin B12, 1946 birth cohort, MRC National Survey of Health and Development, dietary change over time
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Artiodactyla, Energy Intake, Diet, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Meat, Meat Products, Middle Aged, Poultry, Cohort Studies, Diet Records, Micronutrients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review