CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesLanguage Development and DisordersGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Erratum: A highly penetrant form of childhood apraxia of speech due to deletion of 16p11.2

Open access
Fedorenko, Evelina, Morgan, Angela, Murray, Elizabeth, Cardinaux, Annie, Mei, Cristina, Tager-Flusberg, Helen, Fisher, Simon E, Kanwisher, Nancy·2016·European Journal of Human Genetics
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2015.230
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejhg.2015.230

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Fedorenko, E., Morgan, A., Murray, E., Cardinaux, A., Mei, C., Tager-Flusberg, H., Fisher, S. E., & Kanwisher, N.
ORCID
Venue
European Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-01-14
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
310-310
ISSN
  • 1018-4813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5438
DOI
10.1038/ejhg.2015.230
OpenAlex
W4239203533
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
European Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
childhood apraxia of speech, 16p11.2 deletion, copy number variation, speech development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review