16p11.2 Copy Number Variations and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Open accessAbstract
Copy number variations (CNVs) of the human 16p11.2 genetic locus are associated with a range of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy. In this review, we delineate genetic information and diverse phenotypes in individuals with 16p11.2 CNVs, and synthesize preclinical findings from transgenic mouse models of 16p11.2 CNVs. Mice with 16p11.2 deletions or duplications recapitulate many core behavioral phenotypes, including social and cognitive deficits, and exhibit altered synaptic function across various brain areas. Mechanisms of transcriptional dysregulation and cortical maldevelopment are reviewed, along with potential therapeutic intervention strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 243 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
16p11.2 duplication patients with ASD display more severe cognitive impairments than those without ASD.
“Interestingly, 16p11.2 duplication patients with ASD display more severe cognitive impairments than those without ASD [10], indicating that the severity of cognitive phenotypes may correlate with the pathogenesis of other neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly ASD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
A very delayed (>24 months) age of first walking is observed in 6.1% of 16p11.2 deletion carriers and 15.9% of duplication carriers.
“A very delayed (>24 mo.) age of first walking is observed in 6.1% of deletion carriers and 15.9% of duplication carriers [10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
A study of 270 duplication carriers and 442 deletion carriers found FSIQ significantly lower than intrafamilial controls in both duplication carriers (18.0 points) and deletion carriers (22.1 points).
“A study of 270 duplication carriers and 442 deletion carriers found that FSIQ was significantly lower than intrafamilial controls in both 16p11.2 duplication carriers (18.0 points) and deletion carriers (22.1 points) [10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Higher variability in FSIQ scores is observed among 16p11.2 duplication carriers than deletion carriers.
“Higher variability in FSIQ scores is observed among duplication carriers than deletion carriers [10, 19], suggesting a broader range of cognitive impairments in duplication patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Green Snyder L,, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental and Psychiatric Features in 16p11.2 Duplication. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016 46(8): p. 2734– 48. 27207092 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Motor control of speech is impaired in 16p11.2 deletion carriers.
“Interestingly, motor control of speech is impaired in 16p11.2 deletion carriers [41], indicating that the motor and language deficits may be fundamentally linked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Demopoulos C,, Abnormal Speech Motor Control in Individuals with 16p11.2 Deletions. Sci Rep, 2018 8(1): p. 1274. 29352208 PMC5775320 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The ratio of males to females with either ASD or ID shows a male predominance in both 16p11.2 CNVs.
“In agreement with this, the ratio of males to females with either ASD or ID shows a male predominance in both 16p11.2 CNVs [57], suggesting that being female is a protective factor when predicting overall ASD severity in either 16p11.2 CNV [58].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Polyak A, Rosenfeld JA, and Girirajan S, An assessment of sex bias in neurodevelopmental disorders. Genome Med, 2015 7: p. 94. 26307204 PMC4549901 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Sex was not a significant predictor of psychosis in 16p11.2 CNV carriers.
“However, another study found that sex was not a significant predictor of psychosis in 16p11.2 CNV carriers [44].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Jutla A,, Psychotic symptoms in 16p11.2 copy-number variant carriers. Autism Res, 2020 13(2): p. 187– 198. 31724820 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
16p11.2dp/+ mice exhibit hypolocomotion, in direct contrast to 16p11.2+/− animals.
“16p11.2dp/+ mice also exhibit hypolocomotion [5, 72, 73], in direct contrast to 16p11.2+/− animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Horev G,, Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. PNAS, 2011 108(41): p. 17076– 17081. 21969575 PMC3193230 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [72] Rein B,, Reversal of synaptic and behavioral deficits in a 16p11.2 duplication mouse model via restoration of the GABA synapse regulator Npas4. Mol Psychiatry, 2020(Epub ahead of print). PMC7483162 32099100 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [73] Bristow GC,, 16p11 Duplication Disrupts Hippocampal-Orbitofrontal-Amygdala Connectivity, Revealing a Neural Circuit Endophenotype for Schizophrenia. Cell Rep, 2020 31(3): p. 107536. 32320645 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills), male-specific reductions in locomotion, time in the center of an open field, and ratio of open arm/closed arm time in the elevated plus maze have been reported.
“In 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills), male-specific reductions in locomotion, time in the center of an open field, and ratio of open arm/closed arm time in the elevated plus maze have also been reported [73].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Bristow GC,, 16p11 Duplication Disrupts Hippocampal-Orbitofrontal-Amygdala Connectivity, Revealing a Neural Circuit Endophenotype for Schizophrenia. Cell Rep, 2020 31(3): p. 107536. 32320645 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Male, but not female, 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills) display reduced and altered pup isolation calls, indicating sex-specific communication impairments in perinatal development.
“Male, but not female, 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills) display reduced and altered pup isolation calls, indicating sex-specific communication impairments in perinatal development [74].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] Agarwalla S,, Male-specific alterations in structure of isolation call sequences of mouse pups with 16p11.2 deletion. Genes Brain Behav, 2020: p. e12681. 32558237 PMC7116069 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
16p11.2+/− models show reduced body size/weight, in contrast to the human obesity phenotype.
“However, 16p11.2+/− models show reduced body size/weight [4, 5, 60, 61, 63], in contrast to the human obesity phenotype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Horev G,, Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. PNAS, 2011 108(41): p. 17076– 17081. 21969575 PMC3193230 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60] Yang M,, 16p11.2 deletion syndrome mice display sensory and ultrasonic vocalization deficits during social interactions. Autism Research, 2015 8(5): p. 507– 521. 25663600 PMC5321681 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Brunner D,, Comprehensive Analysis of the 16p11.2 Deletion and Null Cntnap2 Mouse Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder. PLoS One, 2015 10(8): p. e0134572. 26273832 PMC4537259 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [63] Yang M,, In tribute to Bob Blanchard: Divergent behavioral phenotypes of 16p11.2 deletion mice reared in same-genotype versus mixed-genotype cages. Physiol Behav, 2015 146: p. 16– 27. 26066718 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Gene ontology analysis of DEGs in mouse cortex indicates the strongest disruption of genes related to regulation of transcription.
“Gene ontology (GO) analysis of DEGs in mouse cortex indicates the strongest disruption of genes related to “regulation of transcription”.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The largest portion of upregulated DEGs (21.6%) are identified as enzyme modulators.
“The largest portion of upregulated DEGs (21.6%) are identified as “Enzyme Modulators”.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
16p11.2dp/+ mice (Herault) show impaired LTP in CA1.
“The 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Herault) show impaired LTP in CA1 [59].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Arbogast T,, Reciprocal Effects on Neurocognitive and Metabolic Phenotypes in Mouse Models of 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Syndromes. PLoS Genet, 2016 12(2): p. e1005709. 26872257 PMC4752317 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
A separate RNA-seq experiment in mPFC of 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills) identifies 388 DEGs (277 downregulated, 111 upregulated), confirming broad transcriptional disruption extending far beyond the genes located within the 16p11.2 region.
“A separate RNA-seq experiment in mPFC of 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills) identifies 388 DEGs (277 downregulated, 111 upregulated), confirming broad transcriptional disruption extending far beyond the genes located within the 16p11.2 region [72].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Rein B,, Reversal of synaptic and behavioral deficits in a 16p11.2 duplication mouse model via restoration of the GABA synapse regulator Npas4. Mol Psychiatry, 2020(Epub ahead of print). PMC7483162 32099100 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The top pathways implicated in human LCLs are microtubule cytoskeleton organization and cell surface receptor-linked signal transduction.
“The top pathways implicated in human LCLs are “microtubule cytoskeleton organization” and “cell surface receptor-linked signal transduction”.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Copy number variations at the human 16p11.2 locus are linked to a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy.
“Copy number variations (CNVs) of the human 16p11.2 genetic locus are associated with a range of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability and epilepsy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Balance impairment and gait abnormalities are reported in both 16p11.2 CNVs.
“Balance impairment and gait abnormalities are reported in both 16p11.2 CNVs [39].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Goldman S,, Quantitative gait assessment in children with 16p11.2 syndrome. J Neurodev Disord, 2019 11(1): p. 26. 31656164 PMC6816222 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
16p11.2 duplication carriers have a broader range of cognitive impairments than deletion carriers.
“Higher variability in FSIQ scores is observed among duplication carriers than deletion carriers [10, 19], suggesting a broader range of cognitive impairments in duplication patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Schizophrenia appears to be associated more strongly with 16p11.2 duplications than with deletions.
“Schizophrenia (SZ) appears to be associated more strongly with 16p11.2 duplications [9, 25–27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [9] McCarthy SE,, Microduplications of 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia. Nat Genet, 2009 41(11): p. 1223– 7. 19855392 PMC2951180 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Steinberg S,, Common variant at 16p11.2 conferring risk of psychosis. Mol Psychiatry, 2014 19(1): p. 108– 14. 23164818 PMC3872086 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Sahoo T,, Copy number variants of schizophrenia susceptibility loci are associated with a spectrum of speech and developmental delays and behavior problems. Genet Med, 2011 13(10): p. 868– 80. 21792059 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Kirov G,, De novo CNV analysis implicates specific abnormalities of postsynaptic signalling complexes in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry, 2012 17(2): p. 142– 53. 22083728 PMC3603134 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Epilepsy/seizures ranks among the most common phenotypes observed in both 16p11.2 deletions and duplications.
“Epilepsy/seizures ranks among the most common phenotypes observed in both 16p11.2 deletions and duplications [10, 12, 16, 17, 33, 36] (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Zufferey F,, A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2012 49: p. 660– 668. 23054248 PMC3494011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Rosenfeld JA,, Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2010 2: p. 26– 38. 21731881 PMC3125720 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Shinawi M,, Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2010 47(5): p. 332– 341. 19914906 PMC3158566 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Bijlsma EK,, Extending the phenotype of current rearrangements of 16p11.2: deletions in mentally retarded patients without autism and in normal individuals. European Journal of Medical Genetics, 2009 52: p. 77– 87. 19306953 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Steinman KJ,, 16p11.2 deletion and duplication: Characterizing neurologic phenotypes in a large clinically ascertained cohort. Am J Med Genet A, 2016 170(11): p. 2943– 2955. 27410714 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The severity of cognitive phenotypes in 16p11.2 duplication carriers may correlate with the pathogenesis of other neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly ASD.
“Interestingly, 16p11.2 duplication patients with ASD display more severe cognitive impairments than those without ASD [10], indicating that the severity of cognitive phenotypes may correlate with the pathogenesis of other neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly ASD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Epilepsy is a highly penetrant phenotype in 16p11.2 deletions and duplications.
“Epilepsy is thus a highly penetrant phenotype in 16p11.2 deletions and duplications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
16p11.2 deletions are more likely to be de novo events than duplications.
“Altogether, these results suggest that 16p11.2 deletions are more likely to be de novo events than duplications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Several supporting studies also reported lower FSIQ scores in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication patients than in intrafamilial controls.
“Several supporting studies also reported lower FSIQ scores in 16p11.2 deletion [12, 35] and duplication [19, 35] patients than intrafamilial controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Zufferey F,, A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2012 49: p. 660– 668. 23054248 PMC3494011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Hippolyte L,, The Number of Genomic Copies at the 16p11.2 Locus Modulates Language, Verbal Memory, and Inhibition. Biol Psychiatry, 2016 80(2): p. 129– 139. 26742926 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Green Snyder L,, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental and Psychiatric Features in 16p11.2 Duplication. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016 46(8): p. 2734– 48. 27207092 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
De novo and inherited 16p11.2 deletion carriers do not perform differently on several cognitive tasks.
“However, de novo and inherited deletion carriers do not perform differently on several cognitive tasks [35].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Hippolyte L,, The Number of Genomic Copies at the 16p11.2 Locus Modulates Language, Verbal Memory, and Inhibition. Biol Psychiatry, 2016 80(2): p. 129– 139. 26742926 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
ASD appears to be a highly penetrant phenotype in both 16p11.2 duplications and deletions.
“Overall, ASD appears to be a highly penetrant phenotype in both 16p11.2 duplications and deletions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Bipolar disorder is reported in 16p11.2 duplication carriers.
“Bipolar disorder is also reported in 16p11.2 duplication carriers [9, 14, 24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] McCarthy SE,, Microduplications of 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia. Nat Genet, 2009 41(11): p. 1223– 7. 19855392 PMC2951180 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Maillard AM,, The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity. Molecular Psychiatry, 2014 20: p. 140– 147. 25421402 PMC4320286 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Jacquemont S,, Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature, 2011 478(7367): p. 97– 102. 21881559 PMC3637175 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The overlapping genetic predisposition by 16p11.2 CNVs to both SZ and more typical NDDs like ASD and ID appears to support a neurodevelopmental origin of SZ.
“The overlapping genetic predisposition by 16p11.2 CNVs to both SZ and more typical NDDs like ASD and ID appears to support a neurodevelopmental origin of SZ [46].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Owen MJ,, Neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry, 2011 198(3): p. 173– 5. 21357874 PMC3764497 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
BMI of 16p11.2 duplication patients is significantly lower than controls.
“Conversely, BMI of 16p11.2 duplication patients is significantly lower than controls [10, 24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Jacquemont S,, Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature, 2011 478(7367): p. 97– 102. 21881559 PMC3637175 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several reports indicate higher BMI in 16p11.2 deletion patients.
“Several reports indicate higher BMI in 16p11.2 deletion patients [10, 12, 23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Zufferey F,, A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2012 49: p. 660– 668. 23054248 PMC3494011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Qureshi AY,, Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. J Neurosci, 2014 34(34): p. 11199– 211. 25143601 PMC4138332 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Motor and language deficits in 16p11.2 deletion carriers may be fundamentally linked.
“Interestingly, motor control of speech is impaired in 16p11.2 deletion carriers [41], indicating that the motor and language deficits may be fundamentally linked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The association between 16p11.2 CNVs and ASD/ID, but not psychosis, may involve a sex bias.
“Thus, the association between 16p11.2 CNVs and ASD/ID, but not psychosis, may involve a sex bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Many deficits present in deletion carriers, such as apraxia of speech, cannot be tested or modeled in animals.
“Another limitation is that many deficits present in deletion carriers, such as apraxia of speech, cannot be tested or modeled in animals [71].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Fedorenko E,, A highly penetrant form of childhood apraxia of speech due to deletion of 16p11.2. Eur J Hum Genet, 2016 24(2): p. 310. 26763793 PMC4717201
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Being female is a protective factor when predicting overall ASD severity in either 16p11.2 CNV.
“In agreement with this, the ratio of males to females with either ASD or ID shows a male predominance in both 16p11.2 CNVs [57], suggesting that being female is a protective factor when predicting overall ASD severity in either 16p11.2 CNV [58].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Hudac CM,, Evaluating heterogeneity in ASD symptomatology, cognitive ability, and adaptive functioning among 16p11.2 CNV carriers. Autism Res, 2020(Epub ahead of print). 32597026 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Several phenotypes, such as body weight, are discordant between mice and humans.
“However, several phenotypes, such as body weight, are discordant between mice and humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These findings support a role for Mapk3 in cortical development abnormalities associated with 16p11.2 CNVs.
“These findings support a role for Mapk3 in cortical development abnormalities associated with 16p11.2 CNVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Human carriers of 16p11.2 deletions have larger medial fiber tracts.
“coinciding with the increased medial fiber tracts in human deletion carriers [14]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Maillard AM,, The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity. Molecular Psychiatry, 2014 20: p. 140– 147. 25421402 PMC4320286 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the 16p11.2 hemideletion mouse model, gray matter volume does not differ from controls.
“16p11.2+/− mice (Mills) do not exhibit changes in gray matter [7]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Kumar VJ,, Linking spatial gene expression patterns to sex-specific brain structural changes on a mouse model of 16p11.2 hemideletion. Transl Psychiatry, 2018 8(1): p. 109. 29844452 PMC5974415 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Disrupted synaptic function in striatal MSNs is thought to underlie locomotion-related behavioral phenotypes in 16p11.2+/− mice.
“Disrupted synaptic function in striatal MSNs is thought to underlie locomotion-related behavioral phenotypes in 16p11.2+/− mice [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The same hemideletion mice show increases in medial and peristriatal fiber tracts that are specific to males.
“they show male-specific increases in medial and peristriatal fiber tracts [7]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Kumar VJ,, Linking spatial gene expression patterns to sex-specific brain structural changes on a mouse model of 16p11.2 hemideletion. Transl Psychiatry, 2018 8(1): p. 109. 29844452 PMC5974415 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
These findings highlight the wide transcriptional impacts of 16p11.2 CNVs.
“These findings highlight the wide transcriptional impacts of 16p11.2 CNVs, but further studies should clarify the specific contributions of 16p11.2 genes to these far-reaching downstream transcriptional disruptions and their links to the heterogeneous associated behavioral phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Abnormality in gene transcription or protein translation may underlie the involvement of Cul3 in neurodevelopmental disorders.
“Abnormality in gene transcription or protein translation may underlie the involvement of Cul3 in neurodevelopmental disorders [87, 88].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [87] Rapanelli M,, Behavioral, circuitry, and molecular aberrations by region-specific deficiency of the high-risk autism gene Cul3. Mol Psychiatry, 2019(Epub ahead of print). 31455858 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [88] Dong Z,, CUL3 Deficiency Causes Social Deficits and Anxiety-like Behaviors by Impairing Excitation-Inhibition Balance through the Promotion of Cap-Dependent Translation. Neuron, 2020 105(3): p. 475– 490 e6. 31780330 PMC7007399 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The cellular changes seen in 16p11.2 models, such as transcriptional and synaptic dysregulation, abnormal cell proliferation, and altered cortical development, offer insight into the molecular pathologies behind behavioral syndromes linked to 16p11.2 CNVs.
“The array of cellular changes in 16p11.2 models, including transcriptional and synaptic dysregulation, aberrant cell proliferation and cortical development, provides a window into the molecular pathologies underlying behavioral syndromes associated with 16p11.2 CNVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Humans and mice with 16p11.2 deletions both show reduced prefrontal cortical connectivity.
“Both humans and mice carrying 16p11.2 deletions display reduced prefrontal cortical connectivity [100]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] Bertero A,, Autism-associated 16p11.2 microdeletion impairs prefrontal functional connectivity in mouse and human. Brain, 2018 141(7): p. 2055– 2065. 29722793 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
NMDARs are substantially involved in autism spectrum disorder.
“consistent with the significant involvement of NMDARs in ASD [101–103].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [101] Won H,, Autistic-like social behaviour in Shank2-mutant mice improved by restoring NMDA receptor function. Nature, 2012 486(7402): p. 261– 5. 22699620 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [102] Qin L,, Social deficits in Shank3-deficient mouse models of autism are rescued by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition. Nat Neurosci, 2018 21(4): p. 564– 575. 29531362 PMC5876144 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [103] Lee EJ, Choi SY, and Kim E, NMDA receptor dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 2015 20: p. 8– 13. 25636159 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
GABAA receptor availability is unchanged in human 16p11.2 deletion carriers.
“It has also been demonstrated that GABAA receptor availability is unaffected in human 16p11.2 deletion carriers [99]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] Horder J,, GABAA receptor availability is not altered in adults with autism spectrum disorder or in mouse models. Sci Transl Med, 2018 10(461). 30282698 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Human 16p11.2 deletion patients have larger volumes in these same structures.
“concordant with the increased volume of these structures in human deletion patients [54]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Sonderby IE,, Dose response of the 16p11.2 distal copy number variant on intracranial volume and basal ganglia. Mol Psychiatry, 2020 25(3): p. 584– 602. 30283035 PMC7042770 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CTEP also improves inhibitory avoidance deficits in 16p11.2 hemideletion mice.
“This approach was thus tested in 16p11.2+/− mice and proved effective in ameliorating IA deficits [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Tian D,, Contribution of mGluR5 to hippocampal pathophysiology in a mouse model of human chromosome 16p11.2 microdeletion. Nature Neuroscience, 2015 18(2): p. 182– 184. 25581360 PMC4323380 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
R-baclofen has therapeutic efficacy in Fmr1-deficient mice that share a similar synaptic plasticity phenotype.
“as R-baclofen displayed therapeutic efficacy in Fmr1-deficient mice with a similar synaptic plasticity phenotype [64]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Stoppel LJ,, R-Baclofen Reverses Cognitive Deficits and Improves Social Interactions in Two Lines of 16p11.2 Deletion Mice. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018 43(3): p. 513– 524. 28984295 PMC5770771 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a Fragile X mouse model, chronic administration of the mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator CTEP after adolescence reverses inhibitory avoidance deficits.
“In a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome, IA deficits are reversed via chronic post-adolescent administration of the mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator (NAM) CTEP [97].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [97] Michalon A,, Chronic pharmacological mGlu5 inhibition corrects fragile X in adult mice. Neuron, 2012 74(1): p. 49– 56. 22500629 PMC8822597 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The medial fiber tract increase in 16p11.2 hemideletion mice matches the increase seen in human deletion carriers.
“but they show male-specific increases in medial and peristriatal fiber tracts [7], coinciding with the increased medial fiber tracts in human deletion carriers [14]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] Kumar VJ,, Linking spatial gene expression patterns to sex-specific brain structural changes on a mouse model of 16p11.2 hemideletion. Transl Psychiatry, 2018 8(1): p. 109. 29844452 PMC5974415 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Maillard AM,, The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity. Molecular Psychiatry, 2014 20: p. 140– 147. 25421402 PMC4320286 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
R-baclofen improves performance of 16p11.2 hemideletion mice on several cognitive tasks.
“R-baclofen improves performance of 16p11.2+/− mice in several cognitive tasks, while hyperlocomotion and USVs are unaffected [64].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Stoppel LJ,, R-Baclofen Reverses Cognitive Deficits and Improves Social Interactions in Two Lines of 16p11.2 Deletion Mice. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018 43(3): p. 513– 524. 28984295 PMC5770771 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
16p11.2 hemideletion mice display deficits in inhibitory avoidance.
“Inhibitory avoidance (IA) deficits are observed in 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills) [65].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Tian D,, Contribution of mGluR5 to hippocampal pathophysiology in a mouse model of human chromosome 16p11.2 microdeletion. Nature Neuroscience, 2015 18(2): p. 182– 184. 25581360 PMC4323380 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Multiple highly penetrant developmental phenotypes are associated with both 16p11.2 deletions and duplications.
“A number of highly penetrant developmental phenotypes are linked to both 16p11.2 deletions and duplications (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
NMDAR hypofunction in the prefrontal cortex is a core mechanism underlying phenotypes linked to 16p11.2 deletion.
“This study suggests NMDAR hypofunction in PFC as a core mechanism in 16p11.2 deletion-linked phenotypes, consistent with the significant involvement of NMDARs in ASD [101–103].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [62] Wang W,, Chemogenetic Activation of Prefrontal Cortex Rescues Synaptic and Behavioral Deficits in a Mouse Model of 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome. J Neurosci, 2018 38(26): p. 5939– 5948. 29853627 PMC6021990 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [101] Won H,, Autistic-like social behaviour in Shank2-mutant mice improved by restoring NMDA receptor function. Nature, 2012 486(7402): p. 261– 5. 22699620 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [102] Qin L,, Social deficits in Shank3-deficient mouse models of autism are rescued by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition. Nat Neurosci, 2018 21(4): p. 564– 575. 29531362 PMC5876144 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [103] Lee EJ, Choi SY, and Kim E, NMDA receptor dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 2015 20: p. 8– 13. 25636159 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because 16p11.2 CNVs affect 27-29 genes, they can cause broad and severe downstream biochemical disruptions across multiple brain regions.
“Given the effects of 16p11.2 CNVs on 27–29 genes, these mutations have the capacity to cause broad and severe downstream biochemical insults across various brain areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: 16p11.2 CNVs affect 27–29 genes.
- Interpretationcitation
Prefrontal cortex disruption contributes to 16p11.2 CNV phenotypes.
“further suggesting a role for PFC disruption in 16p11.2 CNVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] Bertero A,, Autism-associated 16p11.2 microdeletion impairs prefrontal functional connectivity in mouse and human. Brain, 2018 141(7): p. 2055– 2065. 29722793 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Npas4 is a key regulator of GABA synapses.
“a key regulator of GABA synapses [104, 105]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [104] Lin Y,, Activity-dependent regulation of inhibitory synapse development by Npas4. Nature, 2008 455(7217): p. 1198– 204. 18815592 PMC2637532
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [105] Bloodgood BL,, The activity-dependent transcription factor NPAS4 regulates domain-specific inhibition. Nature, 2013 503(7474): p. 121– 5. 24201284 PMC4169177
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Combined transcriptomic analyses of 16p11.2 CNV mice and human RNAseq datasets found overrepresentation of histone methylation pathways.
“Combined transcriptomic analyses of 16p11.2 CNV mice and human RNAseq datasets have identified overrepresentation of pathways related to histone methylation [76]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Blumenthal I,, Transcriptional consequences of 16p11.2 deletion and duplication in mouse cortex and multiplex autism families. Am J Hum Genet, 2014 94(6): p. 870– 83. 24906019 PMC4121471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
16p11.2 hemideletion mice have larger volumes in the hypothalamus, midbrain, cerebellar cortex, striatum, nucleus accumbens, and globus pallidus.
“Increased volumes of several brain areas, including the hypothalamus, midbrain, cerebellar cortex, striatum, nucleus accumbens and globus pallidus, are observed in 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills, Dolmetsch) [4, 5, 96]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Horev G,, Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. PNAS, 2011 108(41): p. 17076– 17081. 21969575 PMC3193230 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [96] Ellegood J,, Clustering autism: using neuroanatomical differences in 26 mouse models to gain insight into the heterogeneity. Mol Psychiatry, 2015 20(1): p. 118– 25. 25199916 PMC4426202 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 82
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMotor delays are reported at rates of 57.1% and 50% in 16p11.2 deletion carriers, and in 60% of duplication carriers.
“Motor delays are reported at rates of 57.1% [15] and 50% [17] in deletion carriers, and in 60% of duplication carriers [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Hanson E,, Cognitive and behavioral characterization of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2010 31: p. 649– 657. 20613623 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Shinawi M,, Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2010 47(5): p. 332– 341. 19914906 PMC3158566 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn multiple studies, autistic features or a formal ASD diagnosis were reported in 16.1%-25.6% of 16p11.2 deletion carriers and 20%-33.9% of duplication carriers.
“In multiple studies of subjects with 16p11.2 deletion or duplication, autistic features or a formal ASD diagnosis were reported in 16.1% - 25.6% of deletion carriers, and 20% - 33.9% of duplication carriers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, genetic screenings find 16p11.2 deletions at rates of 0.25-2.9% and duplications at rates of 0.15-0.78%.
“Data compiled from eight studies [13, 15–17, 20, 24, 26, 33] screening individuals with either ASD, ID, developmental delay (DD), dysmorphic features (DF), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), obesity, or seizures find 16p11.2 deletions at rates of 0.25–2.9%, and duplications at rates between 0.15–0.78% (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [13] Weiss LA,, Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2008 358: p. 667– 675. 18184952 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Hanson E,, Cognitive and behavioral characterization of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2010 31: p. 649– 657. 20613623 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Rosenfeld JA,, Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2010 2: p. 26– 38. 21731881 PMC3125720 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Shinawi M,, Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2010 47(5): p. 332– 341. 19914906 PMC3158566 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Walters RG,, A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2. Nature, 2010 463(7281): p. 671– 5. 20130649 PMC2880448 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Jacquemont S,, Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature, 2011 478(7367): p. 97– 102. 21881559 PMC3637175 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Sahoo T,, Copy number variants of schizophrenia susceptibility loci are associated with a spectrum of speech and developmental delays and behavior problems. Genet Med, 2011 13(10): p. 868– 80. 21792059 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Bijlsma EK,, Extending the phenotype of current rearrangements of 16p11.2: deletions in mentally retarded patients without autism and in normal individuals. European Journal of Medical Genetics, 2009 52: p. 77– 87. 19306953 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationDevelopmental coordination disorder is reported at rates of 32% and 57.7% in 16p11.2 deletion carriers, and 46.8% in duplication carriers.
“Developmental coordination disorder is reported at rates of 32% [23] and 57.7% [21] in deletion carriers, and 46.8% in duplication carriers [19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [23] Qureshi AY,, Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. J Neurosci, 2014 34(34): p. 11199– 211. 25143601 PMC4138332 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Hanson E,, The cognitive and behavioral phenotype of the 16p11.2 deletion in a clinically ascertained population. Biological Psychiatry, 2015 77: p. 785– 793. 25064419 PMC5410712 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Green Snyder L,, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental and Psychiatric Features in 16p11.2 Duplication. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016 46(8): p. 2734– 48. 27207092 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn studies with at least 50 subjects, 60-76% of 16p11.2 deletions were reported as de novo, while only 16-29% of 16p11.2 duplications occurred de novo.
“In studies with at least 50 subjects, between 60–76% of 16p11.2 deletions were reported as de novo events [10, 12, 34, 36], while only 16–29% of 16p11.2 duplications occurred de novo [10, 19, 34, 36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Zufferey F,, A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2012 49: p. 660– 668. 23054248 PMC3494011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Niarchou M,, Psychiatric disorders in children with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. Transl Psychiatry, 2019 9(1): p. 8. 30664628 PMC6341088 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Steinman KJ,, 16p11.2 deletion and duplication: Characterizing neurologic phenotypes in a large clinically ascertained cohort. Am J Med Genet A, 2016 170(11): p. 2943– 2955. 27410714 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Green Snyder L,, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental and Psychiatric Features in 16p11.2 Duplication. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016 46(8): p. 2734– 48. 27207092 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn one group of 16p11.2 duplication carriers, FSIQ scores ranged from 33 to 129, with 17% showing severe impairment (<55) and 33% falling within the average range or better.
“In one group of 16p11.2 duplication carriers, FSIQ scores range from 33–129, with 17% displaying severe impairment (<55), while 33% fall within the average range or better [19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Green Snyder L,, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental and Psychiatric Features in 16p11.2 Duplication. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016 46(8): p. 2734– 48. 27207092 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn the general population, 16p11.2 deletions have been reported at rates of 0.028%-0.043%, and duplications at 0.035%-0.053%.
“16p11.2 deletions have been reported at rates of 0.028% - 0.043% in the general population, while duplications have been reported between 0.035% - 0.053% (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn studies of at least 50 subjects, ID was reported in 10.3%-28.1% of 16p11.2 deletion carriers and 30.5%-40.3% of duplication carriers.
“In studies of at least 50 subjects, ID was reported in 10.3% - 28.1% of 16p11.2 deletion carriers, and 30.5% - 40.3% of duplication carriers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBoth 16p11.2 deletions and duplications appear to be preferentially maternally inherited.
“Both the deletion and duplication appear to be preferentially maternally inherited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn studies of at least 50 subjects, epilepsy/seizures has been reported in 21.8%-26.8% of 16p11.2 deletion carriers and 19.4%-29% of duplication carriers.
“In studies of at least 50 subjects, epilepsy/seizures has been reported in 21.8% - 26.8% of deletion carriers, and 19.4% - 29% of duplication carriers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationPsychotic symptoms have been reported in 6.1% of 16p11.2 duplication carriers and 2.3% of deletion carriers.
“Psychotic symptoms have also been reported in duplication (7/114 [6.1%]) and deletion (5/217 [2.3%]) carriers [34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Niarchou M,, Psychiatric disorders in children with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. Transl Psychiatry, 2019 9(1): p. 8. 30664628 PMC6341088 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn studies of at least 50 subjects, macrocephaly was reported in 17.1%-17.3% of 16p11.2 deletion carriers, while microcephaly was reported in 17.1%-22.3% of duplication carriers.
“In studies of at least 50 subjects, macrocephaly was reported in 17.1% - 17.3% of deletion carriers, while microcephaly was reported in 17.1% - 22.3% of duplication carriers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn one study, both 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers exhibited psychotic symptoms, though only duplication was a significant predictor of psychotic symptoms.
“In one study, both 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers exhibited psychotic symptoms, though only the duplication was a significant predictor of psychotic symptoms [44].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Jutla A,, Psychotic symptoms in 16p11.2 copy-number variant carriers. Autism Res, 2020 13(2): p. 187– 198. 31724820 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn studies of at least 50 subjects, dysmorphic features/congenital anomalies were reported in 21.1%-58.5% of 16p11.2 deletion carriers and 16.7%-28.7% of duplication carriers, indicating high penetrance in both CNVs.
“In studies of at least 50 subjects, DF/CA were reported in in 21.1% - 58.5% of deletion carriers, and 16.7% - 28.7% of duplication carriers, indicating high penetrance in both CNVs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationBirth parameters for 16p11.2 duplication carriers are generally normal, indicating a postnatal effect.
“Birth parameters for 16p11.2 duplication carriers are generally normal [24], indicating a postnatal effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Jacquemont S,, Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature, 2011 478(7367): p. 97– 102. 21881559 PMC3637175 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAn analysis of 22 screenings found 98 duplications in 36,676 SZ patients (0.26%) and only 12 duplications in 48,331 controls (0.025%), indicating a 10.79-fold increase in SZ risk.
“An analysis of 22 screenings in various populations found 98 duplications in 36,676 SZ patients (0.26%), with only 12 duplications in 48,331 controls (0.025%), indicating a 10.79-fold increase in risk for developing SZ [43].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Chang H,, Rare and common variants at 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res, 2017 184: p. 105– 108. 27889382 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationADHD is observed in 16p11.2 CNV carriers at rates as high as 29% (63/217) in deletion carriers and 42% (48/114) in duplication carriers.
“Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is also observed in 16p11.2 CNV carriers [12, 15–17, 19, 23, 48], at rates as high as 29% (63/217) and 42% (48/114) in deletion and duplication carriers, respectively [34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [12] Zufferey F,, A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2012 49: p. 660– 668. 23054248 PMC3494011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Hanson E,, Cognitive and behavioral characterization of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2010 31: p. 649– 657. 20613623 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Rosenfeld JA,, Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2010 2: p. 26– 38. 21731881 PMC3125720 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Shinawi M,, Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2010 47(5): p. 332– 341. 19914906 PMC3158566 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Green Snyder L,, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental and Psychiatric Features in 16p11.2 Duplication. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016 46(8): p. 2734– 48. 27207092 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Qureshi AY,, Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. J Neurosci, 2014 34(34): p. 11199– 211. 25143601 PMC4138332 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Gudmundsson OO,, Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder shares copy number variant risk with schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. Transl Psychiatry, 2019 9(1): p. 258. 31624239 PMC6797719 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Niarchou M,, Psychiatric disorders in children with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. Transl Psychiatry, 2019 9(1): p. 8. 30664628 PMC6341088 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn a 2009 study, 21 duplications and 1 deletion were detected among 5,877 schizophrenia patients, indicating a 14.5-fold increased SZ risk in 16p11.2 duplication patients.
“In a 2009 study, 21 duplications and 1 deletion were detected among 5,877 schizophrenia (SZ) patients, indicating a 14.5-fold increased SZ risk in 16p11.2 duplication patients [9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] McCarthy SE,, Microduplications of 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia. Nat Genet, 2009 41(11): p. 1223– 7. 19855392 PMC2951180 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMale 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills) exhibit sleep deficits and impairments in a reward-directed learning task, while females do not.
“Additionally, male 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills) exhibit sleep deficits [70], and impairments in a reward-directed learning task [67], while females do not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] Angelakos CC,, Hyperactivity and male-specific sleep deficits in the 16p11.2 deletion mouse model of autism. Autism Research, 2017 10: p. 572– 584. 27739237 PMC6201314 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [67] Grissom NM,, Male-specific deficits in natural reward learning in a mouse model of neurodevelopmental disorders. Mol Psychiatry, 2017 23: p. 544– 555. 29038598 PMC5822461 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMild motor deficits are present in 16p11.2+/− models, consistent with human phenotypes.
“Mild motor deficits are also present in these models [4, 61, 68], consistent with human phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Brunner D,, Comprehensive Analysis of the 16p11.2 Deletion and Null Cntnap2 Mouse Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder. PLoS One, 2015 10(8): p. e0134572. 26273832 PMC4537259 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [68] Yang M,, 16p11.2 deletion mice display cognitive deficits in touchscreen learning and novelty recognition tasks. Learning and Memory, 2015 22(12): p. 622– 632. 26572653 PMC4749736 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHyperlocomotion is broadly reported in 16p11.2+/− mice, another behavioral feature that does not coincide directly with human symptomology.
“Hyperlocomotion is also broadly reported in 16p11.2+/− mice [4, 5, 59, 61, 63, 64, 70], another behavioral feature that does not coincide directly with human symptomology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Horev G,, Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. PNAS, 2011 108(41): p. 17076– 17081. 21969575 PMC3193230 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [59] Arbogast T,, Reciprocal Effects on Neurocognitive and Metabolic Phenotypes in Mouse Models of 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Syndromes. PLoS Genet, 2016 12(2): p. e1005709. 26872257 PMC4752317 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Brunner D,, Comprehensive Analysis of the 16p11.2 Deletion and Null Cntnap2 Mouse Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder. PLoS One, 2015 10(8): p. e0134572. 26273832 PMC4537259 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [63] Yang M,, In tribute to Bob Blanchard: Divergent behavioral phenotypes of 16p11.2 deletion mice reared in same-genotype versus mixed-genotype cages. Physiol Behav, 2015 146: p. 16– 27. 26066718 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] Stoppel LJ,, R-Baclofen Reverses Cognitive Deficits and Improves Social Interactions in Two Lines of 16p11.2 Deletion Mice. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018 43(3): p. 513– 524. 28984295 PMC5770771 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [70] Angelakos CC,, Hyperactivity and male-specific sleep deficits in the 16p11.2 deletion mouse model of autism. Autism Research, 2017 10: p. 572– 584. 27739237 PMC6201314 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills) exhibit social and cognitive deficits along with increased repetitive self-grooming, with the absence of motor coordination deficits.
“The 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills) exhibit social and cognitive deficits [72, 73] along with increased repetitive self-grooming [5, 72], with the absence of motor coordination deficits [72].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [72] Rein B,, Reversal of synaptic and behavioral deficits in a 16p11.2 duplication mouse model via restoration of the GABA synapse regulator Npas4. Mol Psychiatry, 2020(Epub ahead of print). PMC7483162 32099100 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [73] Bristow GC,, 16p11 Duplication Disrupts Hippocampal-Orbitofrontal-Amygdala Connectivity, Revealing a Neural Circuit Endophenotype for Schizophrenia. Cell Rep, 2020 31(3): p. 107536. 32320645 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Horev G,, Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. PNAS, 2011 108(41): p. 17076– 17081. 21969575 PMC3193230 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationTwo behavioral phenotypes associated with SZ, PPI of startle responses and MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion, were not observed in 16p11.2dp/+ mice, despite a report on female-specific PPI deficits.
“Two behavioral phenotypes associated with SZ, PPI of startle responses and MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion, were not observed in 16p11.2dp/+ mice [72], despite a report on female-specific PPI deficits [73].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [72] Rein B,, Reversal of synaptic and behavioral deficits in a 16p11.2 duplication mouse model via restoration of the GABA synapse regulator Npas4. Mol Psychiatry, 2020(Epub ahead of print). PMC7483162 32099100 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [73] Bristow GC,, 16p11 Duplication Disrupts Hippocampal-Orbitofrontal-Amygdala Connectivity, Revealing a Neural Circuit Endophenotype for Schizophrenia. Cell Rep, 2020 31(3): p. 107536. 32320645 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation16p11.2+/− mice (Mills) display deficient NMDA-receptor-mediated glutamatergic transmission and reduced action potential firing frequency in mPFC pyramidal neurons, along with increased excitation-inhibition ratio in somatosensory cortex.
“The 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills) display deficient NMDA-receptor-mediated glutamatergic transmission and reduced frequency of action potential firing in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) pyramidal neurons [62], along with increased excitation-inhibition (E-I) ratio in somatosensory cortex [75].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [62] Wang W,, Chemogenetic Activation of Prefrontal Cortex Rescues Synaptic and Behavioral Deficits in a Mouse Model of 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome. J Neurosci, 2018 38(26): p. 5939– 5948. 29853627 PMC6021990 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [75] Antoine MW,, Increased Excitation-Inhibition Ratio Stabilizes Synapse and Circuit Excitability in Four Autism Mouse Models. Neuron, 2019 101(4): p. 648– 661 e4. 30679017 PMC6733271 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAll three lines of 16p11.2+/− mice display social deficits in various testing paradigms and an array of cognitive deficits.
“All 3 lines of 16p11.2+/− mice display social deficits in various testing paradigms [59–64], and an array of cognitive deficits [4, 59, 62–68].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [59] Arbogast T,, Reciprocal Effects on Neurocognitive and Metabolic Phenotypes in Mouse Models of 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Syndromes. PLoS Genet, 2016 12(2): p. e1005709. 26872257 PMC4752317 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60] Yang M,, 16p11.2 deletion syndrome mice display sensory and ultrasonic vocalization deficits during social interactions. Autism Research, 2015 8(5): p. 507– 521. 25663600 PMC5321681 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Brunner D,, Comprehensive Analysis of the 16p11.2 Deletion and Null Cntnap2 Mouse Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder. PLoS One, 2015 10(8): p. e0134572. 26273832 PMC4537259 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [62] Wang W,, Chemogenetic Activation of Prefrontal Cortex Rescues Synaptic and Behavioral Deficits in a Mouse Model of 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome. J Neurosci, 2018 38(26): p. 5939– 5948. 29853627 PMC6021990 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [63] Yang M,, In tribute to Bob Blanchard: Divergent behavioral phenotypes of 16p11.2 deletion mice reared in same-genotype versus mixed-genotype cages. Physiol Behav, 2015 146: p. 16– 27. 26066718 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] Stoppel LJ,, R-Baclofen Reverses Cognitive Deficits and Improves Social Interactions in Two Lines of 16p11.2 Deletion Mice. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018 43(3): p. 513– 524. 28984295 PMC5770771 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [65] Tian D,, Contribution of mGluR5 to hippocampal pathophysiology in a mouse model of human chromosome 16p11.2 microdeletion. Nature Neuroscience, 2015 18(2): p. 182– 184. 25581360 PMC4323380 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [66] Pucilowska J,, The 16p11.2 deletion mouse model of autism exhibits altered cortical progenitor proliferation and brain cytoarchitecture linked to the ERK MAPK pathway. J Neurosci, 2015 35(7): p. 3190– 200. 25698753 PMC6605601 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [67] Grissom NM,, Male-specific deficits in natural reward learning in a mouse model of neurodevelopmental disorders. Mol Psychiatry, 2017 23: p. 544– 555. 29038598 PMC5822461 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHypolocomotion and enhanced object recognition memory are reported in 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Herault) on a C57BL/6N inbred background, whereas on a F1 C57BL/6N-C3B hybrid background, mice additionally exhibit social approach deficits.
“Hypolocomotion and enhanced object recognition memory are reported in 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Herault) on a C57BL/6N inbred genetic background, whereas on a F1 C57BL/6N-C3B hybrid background, mice additionally exhibit social approach deficits [59].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Arbogast T,, Reciprocal Effects on Neurocognitive and Metabolic Phenotypes in Mouse Models of 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Syndromes. PLoS Genet, 2016 12(2): p. e1005709. 26872257 PMC4752317 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationStartle response and pre-pulse inhibition are severely impaired in the 16p11.2+/− mice (Dolmetsch).
“Startle response [4, 60] and pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) [60] are severely impaired in the 16p11.2+/− mice (Dolmetsch).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60] Yang M,, 16p11.2 deletion syndrome mice display sensory and ultrasonic vocalization deficits during social interactions. Autism Research, 2015 8(5): p. 507– 521. 25663600 PMC5321681 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationCultured pyramidal neurons from 16p11.2dp/+ mice exhibit increased ERK1 phosphorylation and greater dendritic arborization, which can be reversed by ERK inhibition.
“Cultured pyramidal neurons from 16p11.2dp/+ mice exhibit increased ERK1 phosphorylation, and greater dendritic arborization, which can be reversed by ERK inhibition [81].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] Blizinsky KD,, Reversal of dendritic phenotypes in 16p11.2 microduplication mouse model neurons by pharmacological targeting of a network hub. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016 113(30): p. 8520– 5. 27402753 PMC4968749 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationGABAergic neurons in the ventral medulla of 16p11.2+/− mice display hyperpolarized resting membrane potential and increased membrane resistance.
“Additionally, GABAergic neurons in the ventral medulla display hyperpolarized resting membrane potential and increased membrane resistance [69].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Lu HC,, Altered sleep architecture, rapid eye movement sleep, and neural oscillation in a mouse model of human chromosome 16p11.2 microdeletion. Sleep, 2019 42(3). PMC7850008 30541142 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationNAc medium spiny neurons in 16p11.2+/− mice (Dolmetsch) display increased AMPAR/NMDAR ratio and decreased paired pulse ratios, along with increased miniature EPSC frequency.
“Nucleus accumbens (NAc) medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in 16p11.2+/− mice (Dolmetsch) display increased AMPAR/NMDAR ratio and decreased paired pulse ratios (PPR), along with increased miniature EPSC frequency [4].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationGO analysis indicates that the largest portion of downregulated genes are classified as transcription factors (17.7%), consistent with prior RNA-seq data.
“GO analysis indicates that the largest portion of downregulated genes are classified as “Transcription Factors” (17.7%), consistent with prior RNA-seq data [76].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Blumenthal I,, Transcriptional consequences of 16p11.2 deletion and duplication in mouse cortex and multiplex autism families. Am J Hum Genet, 2014 94(6): p. 870– 83. 24906019 PMC4121471 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHuman iPSC-derived neurons from 16p11.2 deletion/duplication carriers display increased soma size/dendrite length in deletion neurons and reduced size/dendrite length in duplication neurons.
“Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons from 16p11.2 deletion/duplication carriers display corresponding features, with increased soma size/dendrite length in 16p11.2 deletion neurons, and reduced size/dendrite length in duplication neurons [77].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Deshpande A,, Cellular Phenotypes in Human iPSC-Derived Neurons from a Genetic Model of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Cell Rep, 2017 21(10): p. 2678– 2687. 29212016 PMC5730067 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn humans, mutations in MAPK3 and TAOK2 but not in KCTD13 have been found in ASD cases.
“In humans, mutations in MAPK3 [92] and TAOK2 [93, 94] but not in KCTD13 [85, 95] have been found in ASD cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [92] Schaaf CP,, Oligogenic heterozygosity in individuals with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Hum Mol Genet, 2011 20(17): p. 3366– 75. 21624971 PMC3153303 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [93] Lim ET,, Rates, distribution and implications of postzygotic mosaic mutations in autism spectrum disorder. Nat Neurosci, 2017 20(9): p. 1217– 1224. 28714951 PMC5672813 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94] RK CY,, Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder. Nat Neurosci, 2017 20(4): p. 602– 611. 28263302 PMC5501701 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [85] DeRubeis S,, Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature, 2014 515(7526): p. 209– 15. 25363760 PMC4402723 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [95] Satterstrom FK,, Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism. Cell, 2020 180(3): p. 568– 584 e23. 31981491 PMC7250485 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn zebrafish, out of all 16p11.2 gene transcripts, only KCTD13 overexpression drives a microcephalic phenotype with reduced brain cell counts, whereas its suppression produces a macrocephalic phenotype with increased brain cell counts.
“In zebrafish, out of all 16p11.2 gene transcripts, only KCTD13 overexpression drives a microcephalic phenotype with reduced brain cell counts, whereas its suppression produces a macrocephalic phenotype with increased brain cell counts [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Golzio C,, KCTD13 is a major driver of mirrored neuroanatomical phenotypes of the 16p11.2 copy number variant. Nature, 2012 485(7398): p. 363– 7. 22596160 PMC3366115 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationLTP/LTD appear intact in hippocampal CA1 of 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills), though protein-synthesis-dependent mGluR5 LTD is impaired.
“Long term potentiation and depression (LTP/LTD) appear to be intact in hippocampal CA1 of 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills), though protein-synthesis-dependent mGluR5 LTD is impaired [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Tian D,, Contribution of mGluR5 to hippocampal pathophysiology in a mouse model of human chromosome 16p11.2 microdeletion. Nature Neuroscience, 2015 18(2): p. 182– 184. 25581360 PMC4323380 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationLoF variants in TAOK2 are identified in ASD probands, however it is not a top-ranking ASD risk factor by large genetic screening.
“LoF variants in TAOK2 are identified in ASD probands [93, 94], however it is not a top-ranking ASD risk factor by large genetic screening [85].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [93] Lim ET,, Rates, distribution and implications of postzygotic mosaic mutations in autism spectrum disorder. Nat Neurosci, 2017 20(9): p. 1217– 1224. 28714951 PMC5672813 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94] RK CY,, Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder. Nat Neurosci, 2017 20(4): p. 602– 611. 28263302 PMC5501701 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [85] DeRubeis S,, Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature, 2014 515(7526): p. 209– 15. 25363760 PMC4402723 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationDisrupted connectivity between hippocampal-orbitofrontal and hippocampal-amygdala circuits has been found in 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills), as well as reduced expression of several GABAergic markers, including parvalbumin, calbindin and somatostatin in frontal cortex.
“In addition, disrupted connectivity between hippocampal-orbitofrontal and hippocampal-amygdala circuits has been found in 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills), as well as reduced expression of several GABAergic markers, including parvalbumin, calbindin and somatostatin in frontal cortex [73].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Bristow GC,, 16p11 Duplication Disrupts Hippocampal-Orbitofrontal-Amygdala Connectivity, Revealing a Neural Circuit Endophenotype for Schizophrenia. Cell Rep, 2020 31(3): p. 107536. 32320645 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRestoring mPFC GABAergic synaptic activity is sufficient to reverse the social and cognitive deficits in 16p11.2dp/+ mice, implicating prefrontal cortical synaptic dysfunction in 16p11.2 duplication pathology.
“Restoring mPFC GABAergic synaptic activity is sufficient to reverse the social and cognitive deficits [72], implicating prefrontal cortical synaptic dysfunction in 16p11.2 duplication pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Rein B,, Reversal of synaptic and behavioral deficits in a 16p11.2 duplication mouse model via restoration of the GABA synapse regulator Npas4. Mol Psychiatry, 2020(Epub ahead of print). PMC7483162 32099100 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMissense variants in MAPK3 are identified in ASD probands, but no loss of function MAPK3 mutations have been reported in ASD, leaving the direct link to ASD uncertain.
“Missense variants in MAPK3 are identified in ASD probands [85, 92], but no loss of function (LoF) MAPK3 mutations have been reported in ASD, leaving the direct link to ASD uncertain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [85] DeRubeis S,, Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature, 2014 515(7526): p. 209– 15. 25363760 PMC4402723 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [92] Schaaf CP,, Oligogenic heterozygosity in individuals with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Hum Mol Genet, 2011 20(17): p. 3366– 75. 21624971 PMC3153303 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation16p11.2+/− mice display reduced brain size and reductions in upper layer cortical projection neurons, driven by increased progenitor proliferation and premature cell cycle exit, resulting in depleted progenitor pools and maldeveloped cortical structures.
“In contrast, 16p11.2+/− mice display reduced brain size and reductions in upper layer cortical projection neurons, driven by increased progenitor proliferation and premature cell cycle exit, resulting in depleted progenitor pools and maldeveloped cortical structures [66].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] Pucilowska J,, The 16p11.2 deletion mouse model of autism exhibits altered cortical progenitor proliferation and brain cytoarchitecture linked to the ERK MAPK pathway. J Neurosci, 2015 35(7): p. 3190– 200. 25698753 PMC6605601 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAn elevated number of MSNs and increased expression of Drd2 in striatum are found in male 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills).
“An elevated number of MSNs and the increased expression of Drd2 in striatum are found in male 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills) [4, 67].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [67] Grissom NM,, Male-specific deficits in natural reward learning in a mouse model of neurodevelopmental disorders. Mol Psychiatry, 2017 23: p. 544– 555. 29038598 PMC5822461 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationTaok2-deficient mice display reduced dendritic growth and deficient excitatory synaptic transmission in PFC through a mechanism involving reduced RhoA expression, suggesting that the 16p11.2 genes Kctd13 and Taok2 may act upon convergent downstream molecules.
“Taok2-deficient mice display reduced dendritic growth and deficient excitatory synaptic transmission in PFC through a mechanism involving the reduced RhoA expression [90], suggesting that the 16p11.2 genes Kctd13 and Taok2 may act upon convergent downstream molecules.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Richter M,, Altered TAOK2 activity causes autism-related neurodevelopmental and cognitive abnormalities through RhoA signaling. Mol Psychiatry, 2019 24(9): p. 1329– 1350. 29467497 PMC6756231 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThese findings do not generalize to mice: two follow-up studies reported normal brain size in Kctd13-deficient mice.
“However, these findings do not generalize to mice: two follow-up studies reported normal brain size in Kctd13-deficient mice [82, 83].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [82] Escamilla CO,, Kctd13 deletion reduces synaptic transmission via increased RhoA. Nature, 2017 551(7679): p. 227– 231. 29088697 PMC5787033 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [83] Arbogast T,, Kctd13-deficient mice display short-term memory impairment and sex-dependent genetic interactions. Hum Mol Genet, 2019 28(9): p. 1474– 1486. 30590535 PMC6489413 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationKctd13-deficient mice display reduced dendritic length/complexity and spine density, which is linked to downstream RhoA overexpression.
“Kctd13-deficient mice display reduced dendritic length/complexity and spine density, which is linked to downstream RhoA overexpression [82].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] Escamilla CO,, Kctd13 deletion reduces synaptic transmission via increased RhoA. Nature, 2017 551(7679): p. 227– 231. 29088697 PMC5787033 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn mice, Cul3 deficiency in the forebrain or PFC induces social interaction impairment and sensory-gating deficiency, as well as NMDA receptor hypofunction, whereas Cul3 loss in the striatum causes stereotypic behaviors, as well as cell type-specific changes in neuronal excitability.
“In mice, Cul3 deficiency in the forebrain or PFC induces social interaction impairment and sensory-gating deficiency, as well as NMDA receptor hypofunction, whereas Cul3 loss in the striatum causes stereotypic behaviors, as well as cell type-specific changes in neuronal excitability [87].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Rapanelli M,, Behavioral, circuitry, and molecular aberrations by region-specific deficiency of the high-risk autism gene Cul3. Mol Psychiatry, 2019(Epub ahead of print). 31455858 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills) display GABAergic synaptic deficits in mPFC pyramidal neurons and increased action potential firing rates.
“The 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills) display GABAergic synaptic deficits in mPFC pyramidal neurons and increased action potential firing rates [72].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Rein B,, Reversal of synaptic and behavioral deficits in a 16p11.2 duplication mouse model via restoration of the GABA synapse regulator Npas4. Mol Psychiatry, 2020(Epub ahead of print). PMC7483162 32099100 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationVarious structural abnormalities are reported in the striatum and cortex of 16p11.2+/− mice (Dolmetsch), along with an increased population of Drd2+ MSNs in the striatum and reduced Drd1+ neurons in the cortex.
“Various structural abnormalities are reported in the striatum and cortex of 16p11.2+/− mice (Dolmetsch), along with an increased population of Drd2+ MSNs in the striatum, and reduced Drd1+ neurons in the cortex [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationKnockout of the 16p11.2 gene Taok2 produces cognitive and social deficits in mice, and also results in increased brain volume.
“Knockout of the 16p11.2 gene Taok2 produces cognitive and social deficits in mice, and also results in increased brain volume [90].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Richter M,, Altered TAOK2 activity causes autism-related neurodevelopmental and cognitive abnormalities through RhoA signaling. Mol Psychiatry, 2019 24(9): p. 1329– 1350. 29467497 PMC6756231 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRNA-sequencing identifies 2,344 and 1,504 significant differentially expressed genes in the cortex of 16p11.2+/− and 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills), respectively, as well as 908 and 1,290 nominally significant DEGs in lymphoblastoid cell lines from human 16p11.2 deletion or duplication carriers, respectively.
“RNA-sequencing identifies 2,344 and 1,504 significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the cortex of 16p11.2+/− and 16p11.2dp/+ mice (Mills), respectively, as well as 908 and 1,290 nominally significant DEGs in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from human 16p11.2 deletion or duplication carriers, respectively [76].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Blumenthal I,, Transcriptional consequences of 16p11.2 deletion and duplication in mouse cortex and multiplex autism families. Am J Hum Genet, 2014 94(6): p. 870– 83. 24906019 PMC4121471 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationKctd13-deficient mice also display cognitive deficits in several memory tasks, raising the possibility that similar mechanisms may contribute to ID pathogenesis in 16p11.2 CNVs.
“Kctd13-deficient mice also display cognitive deficits in several memory tasks [83], raising the possibility that similar mechanisms may contribute to ID pathogenesis in 16p11.2 CNVs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] Arbogast T,, Kctd13-deficient mice display short-term memory impairment and sex-dependent genetic interactions. Hum Mol Genet, 2019 28(9): p. 1474– 1486. 30590535 PMC6489413 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRecordings from CA1 of 16p11.2+/− mice (Herault) reveal intact synaptic transmission, along with modest but not statistically significant reductions in LTP.
“Recordings from CA1 of 16p11.2+/− mice (Herault) reveal intact synaptic transmission, along with modest but not statistically significant reductions in LTP [59].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Arbogast T,, Reciprocal Effects on Neurocognitive and Metabolic Phenotypes in Mouse Models of 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Syndromes. PLoS Genet, 2016 12(2): p. e1005709. 26872257 PMC4752317 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMouse models carrying 16p11.2 deletions or duplications reproduce many core behavioral phenotypes, such as social and cognitive deficits, and show altered synaptic function in multiple brain regions.
“Mice with 16p11.2 deletions or duplications recapitulate many core behavioral phenotypes, including social and cognitive deficits, and exhibit altered synaptic function across various brain areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe human 16p11.2 locus is a roughly 500-600 kb region containing 27-29 genes on the proximal short arm of chromosome 16.
“The human 16p11.2 gene locus (chromosome 16, position 11.2) is a ~500–600 kb region containing 27–29 genes [4–7] located on the proximal short arm of chromosome 16 [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [4] Portmann T,, Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Reports, 2014 7: p. 1077– 1092. 24794428 PMC4251471 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Horev G,, Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. PNAS, 2011 108(41): p. 17076– 17081. 21969575 PMC3193230 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Golzio C,, KCTD13 is a major driver of mirrored neuroanatomical phenotypes of the 16p11.2 copy number variant. Nature, 2012 485(7398): p. 363– 7. 22596160 PMC3366115 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Kumar VJ,, Linking spatial gene expression patterns to sex-specific brain structural changes on a mouse model of 16p11.2 hemideletion. Transl Psychiatry, 2018 8(1): p. 109. 29844452 PMC5974415 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Barber JC,, 16p11.2-p12.2 duplication syndrome; a genomic condition differentiated from euchromatic variation of 16p11.2. Eur J Hum Genet, 2013 21(2): p. 182– 9. 22828807 PMC3548261 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation16p11.2 deletions are associated with macrocephaly and obesity, while duplications often lead to microcephaly and low body weight/BMI.
“Deletions of 16p11.2 are associated with increased head circumference (macrocephaly) [10, 12, 17, 23] and obesity [10, 12, 16, 20], whereas duplications often result in below average head size (microcephaly) [10, 17, 23, 24] and low body weight/BMI [10, 24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Zufferey F,, A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2012 49: p. 660– 668. 23054248 PMC3494011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Shinawi M,, Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2010 47(5): p. 332– 341. 19914906 PMC3158566 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Qureshi AY,, Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. J Neurosci, 2014 34(34): p. 11199– 211. 25143601 PMC4138332 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Rosenfeld JA,, Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2010 2: p. 26– 38. 21731881 PMC3125720 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Walters RG,, A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2. Nature, 2010 463(7281): p. 671– 5. 20130649 PMC2880448 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Jacquemont S,, Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature, 2011 478(7367): p. 97– 102. 21881559 PMC3637175 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeletions and duplications of 16p11.2 have highly pleiotropic phenotypic effects, with strong links to ASD, ID, motor/developmental delay, dysmorphic features, and epilepsy/seizures.
“Deletions and duplications of 16p11.2 have highly pleiotropic phenotypic effects, with strong links to ASD [8–19], ID [8, 10, 12, 14–16, 19–21], motor/developmental delay [8–10, 12, 13, 15–19, 22], dysmorphic features [8, 12, 16, 17, 22], and epilepsy/seizures [10, 12, 17].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [8] Barber JC,, 16p11.2-p12.2 duplication syndrome; a genomic condition differentiated from euchromatic variation of 16p11.2. Eur J Hum Genet, 2013 21(2): p. 182– 9. 22828807 PMC3548261 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] McCarthy SE,, Microduplications of 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia. Nat Genet, 2009 41(11): p. 1223– 7. 19855392 PMC2951180 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Kumar RA,, Recurrent 16p11.2 microdeletions in autism. Human Molecular Genetics, 2008 17(4): p. 628– 638. 18156158 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Zufferey F,, A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2012 49: p. 660– 668. 23054248 PMC3494011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Weiss LA,, Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2008 358: p. 667– 675. 18184952 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Maillard AM,, The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity. Molecular Psychiatry, 2014 20: p. 140– 147. 25421402 PMC4320286 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Hanson E,, Cognitive and behavioral characterization of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2010 31: p. 649– 657. 20613623 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Rosenfeld JA,, Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2010 2: p. 26– 38. 21731881 PMC3125720 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Shinawi M,, Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2010 47(5): p. 332– 341. 19914906 PMC3158566 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe penetrance of any pediatric phenotype in 16p11.2 deletion carriers is estimated at 62.4%, compared with 11.2% in duplication carriers.
“One study estimates that the penetrance of any pediatric phenotype in deletion carriers is 62.4%, relative to only 11.2% in duplication carriers [37].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Rosenfeld JA,, Estimates of penetrance for recurrent pathogenic copy-number variations. Genet Med, 2013 15(6): p. 478– 81. 23258348 PMC3664238 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDe novo and inherited 16p11.2 duplication carriers show no differences in most clinical outcomes and on cognitive tests.
“De novo and inherited duplication carriers also show no differences in most clinical outcomes [19], and on cognitive tests [10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Green Snyder L,, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental and Psychiatric Features in 16p11.2 Duplication. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016 46(8): p. 2734– 48. 27207092 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] D'Angelo D,, Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016 73(1): p. 20– 30. 26629640 PMC5894477 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA predictive algorithm estimated 16p11.2 deletions at 1 in 3,021 live births and duplications at 1 in 4,216.
“A predictive algorithm estimated 16p11.2 deletions to affect 1 in every 3,021 live births, and duplications 1 in every 4,216 [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Gillentine MA,, An estimation of the prevalence of genomic disorders using chromosomal microarray data. J Hum Genet, 2018 63(7): p. 795– 801. 29691480 PMC6019170 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSeveral studies of ID penetrance in 16p11.2 CNV carriers used clinically ascertained populations, so the ID penetrance estimate may be exaggerated.
“Note that several of these studies were conducted in clinically ascertained populations of 16p11.2 CNV carriers, so the estimate of ID penetrance may be exaggerated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe more severe outcomes associated with 16p11.2 deletions prevent these patients from having children, leading to lower rates of inherited deletions.
“The more severe outcomes associated with 16p11.2 deletions preclude these patients from having children, resulting in lower rates of inherited deletions [34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Niarchou M,, Psychiatric disorders in children with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. Transl Psychiatry, 2019 9(1): p. 8. 30664628 PMC6341088 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenetics Home Reference estimates that 16p11.2 deletions and duplications each affect about 3 in every 10,000 individuals.
“Genetics Home Reference estimates that 16p11.2 deletions and duplications each affect about 3 in every 10,000 individuals [28, 29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] Genetics Home Reference 16p11.2 deletion Available from: https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/16p112-deletion-syndrome#statistics.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [29] Genetics Home Reference 16p11.2 duplication Available from: https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/16p112-duplication#statistics.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenetic screenings of ASD patients repeatedly identify 16p11.2 deletions and duplications, placing them among the strongest genetic risk factors for ASD.
“Genetic screenings of ASD patients repeatedly identify 16p11.2 deletions & duplications, placing them among the strongest genetic risk factors for ASD [11, 13, 16, 38].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [11] Kumar RA,, Recurrent 16p11.2 microdeletions in autism. Human Molecular Genetics, 2008 17(4): p. 628– 638. 18156158 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Weiss LA,, Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2008 358: p. 667– 675. 18184952 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Rosenfeld JA,, Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2010 2: p. 26– 38. 21731881 PMC3125720 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Marshall CR,, Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am J Hum Genet, 2008 82(2): p. 477– 88. 18252227 PMC2426913 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation16p11.2 duplications are similarly associated with speech articulation abnormalities, speech delay, and language deficits.
“Duplications are similarly associated with speech articulation abnormalities [36], speech delay [17, 19], and language deficits [16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [36] Steinman KJ,, 16p11.2 deletion and duplication: Characterizing neurologic phenotypes in a large clinically ascertained cohort. Am J Med Genet A, 2016 170(11): p. 2943– 2955. 27410714 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Shinawi M,, Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2010 47(5): p. 332– 341. 19914906 PMC3158566 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Green Snyder L,, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental and Psychiatric Features in 16p11.2 Duplication. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016 46(8): p. 2734– 48. 27207092 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Rosenfeld JA,, Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2010 2: p. 26– 38. 21731881 PMC3125720 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpeech articulation abnormalities, phonological processing disorder, language or communication disorder, speech or language deficits, and speech delay are present at high rates in 16p11.2 deletion carriers.
“Speech articulation abnormalities [36], phonological processing disorder [21, 23], language or communication disorder [14, 21, 23], speech or language deficits [15, 16], and speech delay [17, 33] are present at high rates in deletion carriers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [36] Steinman KJ,, 16p11.2 deletion and duplication: Characterizing neurologic phenotypes in a large clinically ascertained cohort. Am J Med Genet A, 2016 170(11): p. 2943– 2955. 27410714 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Hanson E,, The cognitive and behavioral phenotype of the 16p11.2 deletion in a clinically ascertained population. Biological Psychiatry, 2015 77: p. 785– 793. 25064419 PMC5410712 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Qureshi AY,, Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. J Neurosci, 2014 34(34): p. 11199– 211. 25143601 PMC4138332 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Maillard AM,, The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity. Molecular Psychiatry, 2014 20: p. 140– 147. 25421402 PMC4320286 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation16p11.2 duplications predispose robustly to SZ and associated psychotic symptoms, with greater penetrance than 16p11.2 deletions.
“Thus, 16p11.2 duplications predispose robustly to SZ and associated psychotic symptoms, with greater penetrance than 16p11.2 deletions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMRI studies show reciprocal brain volume changes, with increased gray/white matter in 16p11.2 deletions and decreased gray/white matter in 16p11.2 duplications.
“MRI studies show reciprocal brain volume changes, with increased gray/white matter in 16p11.2 deletions, and decreased gray/white matter in 16p11.2 duplications [14, 23, 49, 50].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [14] Maillard AM,, The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity. Molecular Psychiatry, 2014 20: p. 140– 147. 25421402 PMC4320286 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Qureshi AY,, Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. J Neurosci, 2014 34(34): p. 11199– 211. 25143601 PMC4138332 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Martin-Brevet S,, Quantifying the Effects of 16p11.2 Copy Number Variants on Brain Structure: A Multisite Genetic-First Study. Biol Psychiatry, 2018 84(4): p. 253– 264. 29778275 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Cardenas-de-la-Parra A,, Developmental trajectories of neuroanatomical alterations associated with the 16p11.2 Copy Number Variations. Neuroimage, 2019 203: p. 116155. 31494251 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation16p11.2 deletions are present at higher-than-expected rates in obese individuals and are more prevalent in developmental delay patients with obesity than those without obesity.
“16p11.2 deletions are present at higher-than-expected rates in obese individuals [31], and are more prevalent in developmental delay (DD) patients with obesity than those without obesity [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [31] Crawford K,, Medical consequences of pathogenic CNVs in adults: analysis of the UK Biobank. J Med Genet, 2019 56(3): p. 131– 138. 30343275 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Walters RG,, A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2. Nature, 2010 463(7281): p. 671– 5. 20130649 PMC2880448 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation16p11.2 duplications have reduced cortical thickness, reduced hippocampal volume, and enlarged ventricles.
“16p11.2 duplications also have the reduced cortical thickness [14, 23], reduced hippocampal volume [49] and enlarged ventricles [50, 53, 55].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [14] Maillard AM,, The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity. Molecular Psychiatry, 2014 20: p. 140– 147. 25421402 PMC4320286 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Qureshi AY,, Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. J Neurosci, 2014 34(34): p. 11199– 211. 25143601 PMC4138332 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Martin-Brevet S,, Quantifying the Effects of 16p11.2 Copy Number Variants on Brain Structure: A Multisite Genetic-First Study. Biol Psychiatry, 2018 84(4): p. 253– 264. 29778275 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Cardenas-de-la-Parra A,, Developmental trajectories of neuroanatomical alterations associated with the 16p11.2 Copy Number Variations. Neuroimage, 2019 203: p. 116155. 31494251 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] Owen JP,, Brain MR Imaging Findings and Associated Outcomes in Carriers of the Reciprocal Copy Number Variation at 16p11.2. Radiology, 2018 286(1): p. 217– 226. 28786752 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] Filges I,, Brain MRI abnormalities and spectrum of neurological and clinical findings in three patients with proximal 16p11.2 microduplication. Am J Med Genet A, 2014 164A(8): p. 2003– 12. 24891046 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation16p11.2 deletions and duplications are linked to depression and anxiety.
“16p11.2 deletions and duplications are linked to several other psychiatric conditions, including depression [14, 47] and anxiety [12, 14, 18, 19, 23, 34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [14] Maillard AM,, The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity. Molecular Psychiatry, 2014 20: p. 140– 147. 25421402 PMC4320286 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Kendall KM,, Association of Rare Copy Number Variants With Risk of Depression. JAMA Psychiatry, 2019 76(8): p. 818– 825. PMC6583866 30994872 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Zufferey F,, A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics, 2012 49: p. 660– 668. 23054248 PMC3494011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Fernandez BA,, Phenotypic spectrum associated with de novo and inherited deletions and duplications at 16p11.2 in individuals ascertained for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. J Med Genet, 2010 47(3): p. 195– 203. 19755429 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Green Snyder L,, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental and Psychiatric Features in 16p11.2 Duplication. J Autism Dev Disord, 2016 46(8): p. 2734– 48. 27207092 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Qureshi AY,, Opposing brain differences in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. J Neurosci, 2014 34(34): p. 11199– 211. 25143601 PMC4138332 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Niarchou M,, Psychiatric disorders in children with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. Transl Psychiatry, 2019 9(1): p. 8. 30664628 PMC6341088 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSleep abnormalities and anxiety have been reported in 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills).
“Sleep abnormalities [69, 70] and anxiety [66] have been reported in 16p11.2+/− mice (Mills).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [69] Lu HC,, Altered sleep architecture, rapid eye movement sleep, and neural oscillation in a mouse model of human chromosome 16p11.2 microdeletion. Sleep, 2019 42(3). PMC7850008 30541142 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [70] Angelakos CC,, Hyperactivity and male-specific sleep deficits in the 16p11.2 deletion mouse model of autism. Autism Research, 2017 10: p. 572– 584. 27739237 PMC6201314 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [66] Pucilowska J,, The 16p11.2 deletion mouse model of autism exhibits altered cortical progenitor proliferation and brain cytoarchitecture linked to the ERK MAPK pathway. J Neurosci, 2015 35(7): p. 3190– 200. 25698753 PMC6605601 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning16p11.2+/− mice display impairments in cognition, sociability and motor function, coinciding with phenotypes present in human 16p11.2 deletion carriers.
“16p11.2+/− mice display impairments in cognition, sociability and motor function, coinciding with phenotypes present in human 16p11.2 deletion carriers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThese mice are deaf, which likely underlies startle/PPI deficits and may be related to altered ultrasonic vocalizations.
“However, these mice are deaf [60], which likely underlies startle/PPI deficits and may be related to altered ultrasonic vocalizations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Yang M,, 16p11.2 deletion syndrome mice display sensory and ultrasonic vocalization deficits during social interactions. Autism Research, 2015 8(5): p. 507– 521. 25663600 PMC5321681 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning16p11.2+/− mice may represent a suitable preclinical model system for evaluating mechanisms of certain social and cognitive dysfunctions, but several deficits associated with 16p11.2 deletions cannot be modeled in these animals.
“Thus, 16p11.2+/− mice may represent a suitable preclinical model system for evaluating mechanisms of certain social and cognitive dysfunctions, but several of the deficits associated with 16p11.2 deletions cannot be modeled in these animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning16p11.2dp/+ mice recapitulate several, but not all, human 16p11.2 duplication phenotypes, including social deficits, repetitive behaviors, and cognitive impairment.
“These studies indicate that 16p11.2dp/+ mice recapitulate several, but not all, human 16p11.2 duplication phenotypes, including social deficits, repetitive behaviors, and cognitive impairment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSynaptic phenotypes in 16p11.2+/− mice vary across brain areas, suggesting that 16p11.2 deletion may cause region- or cell-type-specific impairments.
“Synaptic phenotypes in 16p11.2+/− mice evidently vary across brain areas, suggesting that 16p11.2 deletion may cause region- or cell-type-specific impairments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe reduced brain size in 16p11.2+/− mice is associated with reduced body weight phenotype, suggesting that at least in part, a broader developmental physiological impairment might be involved.
“The precise reasons for the reduced brain size remain unclear, although the reduced brain size is associated with reduced body weight phenotype in 16p11.2+/− mice, suggesting that at least in part, a broader developmental physiological impairment might be involved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningResults from rodent studies of individual genes need to be considered with caution, as the phenotypes of 16p11.2 CNVs may depend on the collective effects of multiple genes in the 16p11.2 locus.
“Additionally, results from rodent studies of individual genes need to be considered with caution, as the phenotypes of 16p11.2 CNVs may depend on the collective effects of multiple genes in 16p11.2 locus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationChemogenetic activation of the prefrontal cortex increases NMDAR phosphorylation and function and improves social and cognitive deficits in 16p11.2 hemideletion mice.
“Chemogenetic activation of PFC leads to increased NMDAR phosphorylation and function, resulting in amelioration of social and cognitive deficits [62].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Wang W,, Chemogenetic Activation of Prefrontal Cortex Rescues Synaptic and Behavioral Deficits in a Mouse Model of 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome. J Neurosci, 2018 38(26): p. 5939– 5948. 29853627 PMC6021990 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation16p11.2 duplication mice show no significant brain volume differences from wild-type mice, although several regions show trends toward smaller volume.
“No significant differences were found between 16p11.2dp/+ (Mills) and WT mice, though trends toward reduced volume were observed in several regions [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Horev G,, Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. PNAS, 2011 108(41): p. 17076– 17081. 21969575 PMC3193230 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationR-baclofen and several mGluR5 negative allosteric modulators have failed in clinical trials for Fragile X patients.
“However, R-baclofen and several mGluR5 NAMs have produced negative results in clinical trials with Fragile X patients [98].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] Berry-Kravis EM,, Drug development for neurodevelopmental disorders: lessons learned from fragile X syndrome. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2018 17(4): p. 280– 299. 29217836 PMC6904225 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRestoring Npas4 expression reverses GABAergic deficits and improves social and cognitive deficits in 16p11.2 duplication mice, but does not affect repetitive grooming.
“a recent study from our group [72] revealed that restoring expression of Npas4, a key regulator of GABA synapses [104, 105] reverses GABAergic deficits and ameliorates social and cognitive deficits in these mice, but not repetitive grooming behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Rein B,, Reversal of synaptic and behavioral deficits in a 16p11.2 duplication mouse model via restoration of the GABA synapse regulator Npas4. Mol Psychiatry, 2020(Epub ahead of print). PMC7483162 32099100 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationR-baclofen does not alter hyperlocomotion or ultrasonic vocalizations in 16p11.2 hemideletion mice.
“R-baclofen improves performance of 16p11.2+/− mice in several cognitive tasks, while hyperlocomotion and USVs are unaffected [64].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Stoppel LJ,, R-Baclofen Reverses Cognitive Deficits and Improves Social Interactions in Two Lines of 16p11.2 Deletion Mice. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018 43(3): p. 513– 524. 28984295 PMC5770771 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation16p11.2 hemideletion mice show NMDAR deficits and reduced activity in prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons.
“As reviewed earlier, 16p11.2+/− mice exhibit NMDAR deficits and hypoactivity in PFC pyramidal neurons [62].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Wang W,, Chemogenetic Activation of Prefrontal Cortex Rescues Synaptic and Behavioral Deficits in a Mouse Model of 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome. J Neurosci, 2018 38(26): p. 5939– 5948. 29853627 PMC6021990 source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The behavioral and synaptic phenotypes observed in 16p11.2 CNV mouse models are informative about human 16p11.2 CNV neurodevelopmental mechanisms despite species differences.
“Thus, 16p11.2+/− mice may represent a suitable preclinical model system for evaluating mechanisms of certain social and cognitive dysfunctions, but several of the deficits associated with 16p11.2 deletions cannot be modeled in these animals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The rates of 16p11.2 CNVs compiled from different screening studies are comparable enough to be summarized as ranges.
“Data compiled from eight studies [13, 15–17, 20, 24, 26, 33] screening individuals with either ASD, ID, developmental delay (DD), dysmorphic features (DF), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), obesity, or seizures find 16p11.2 deletions at rates of 0.25–2.9%, and duplications at rates between 0.15–0.78% (Table 1).”
The paper relies on this without support.
16p11.2 CNVs affect 27–29 genes.
“Given the effects of 16p11.2 CNVs on 27–29 genes”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microdeletion or microduplication of 16p11.2 is a prominent genetic link to autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability.
“Another prominent genetic link to autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability is the microdeletion or microduplication of the human 16p11.2 gene locus 131,132.”
From Mechanisms of synaptic transmission dysregulation in the prefrontal cortex: pathophysiological implications (2022) · cites this paper as [132]
Cites
Global variation in copy number in the human genome
Redon, R., Ishikawa, S., Fitch, K. R., Feuk, L., Perry, G. H., Andrews, T. D., Fiegler, H., Shapero, M. H., Carson, A. R., Chen, W., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05329 · Cited by 4,276 · see citing works
Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism
Study, T. D., De Rubeis, S., Autism, H. M. C. F., UK10K Consortium, The Autism Sequencing Consortium, He, X., Goldberg, A. P., Poultney, C. S., Samocha, K., Ercument Cicek, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13772 · Cited by 2,746 · see citing works
Satterstrom, F. K., Kosmicki, J. A., Wang, J., Breen, M. S., De Rubeis, S., An, J.-Y., Peng, M., Collins, R., Grove, J., Klei, L., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.036 · Cited by 2,321 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In humans, mutations in MAPK3 [90] and TAOK2 [91,92] but not in KCTD13 [83,93] have been found in ASD cases.”
BackgroundInfluentialStructural Variation of Chromosomes in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Marshall, C. R., Noor, A., Vincent, J. B., Lionel, A. C., Feuk, L., Skaug, J., Shago, M., Moessner, R., Pinto, D., Ren, Y., et al. (2008) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.009 · Cited by 1,815 · see citing works
Insel, T. R. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09552 · Cited by 1,783 · see citing works
Association between Microdeletion and Microduplication at 16p11.2 and Autism
Weiss, L. A., Shen, Y., Korn, J. M., Arking, D. E., Miller, D. T., Fossdal, R., Saemundsen, E., Stefansson, H., Ferreira, M. A. R., Green, T., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa075974 · Cited by 1,666 · see citing works
Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders
Pinto, D., Delaby, E., Merico, D., Barbosa, M., Merikangas, A., Klei, L., Thiruvahindrapuram, B., Xu, X., Ziman, R., Wang, Z., et al. (2014) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.018 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
Kirov, G., Pocklington, A. J., Holmans, P., Ivanov, D., Ikeda, M., Ruderfer, D., Moran, J., Chambert, K., Toncheva, D., Georgieva, L., et al. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2011.154 · Cited by 844 · see citing works
Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder
C Yuen, R. K., Merico, D., Bookman, M., L Howe, J., Thiruvahindrapuram, B., Patel, R. V., Whitney, J., Deflaux, N., Bingham, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4524 · Cited by 844 · see citing works
Recurrent 16p11.2 microdeletions in autism
Kumar, R. A., KaraMohamed, S., Sudi, J., Conrad, D. F., Brune, C., Badner, J. A., Gilliam, T. C., Nowak, N. J., Cook, E. H., Dobyns, W. B., et al. (2007) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm376 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Microduplications of 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, McCarthy, S. E., Makarov, V., Kirov, G., Addington, A. M., McClellan, J., Yoon, S., Perkins, D. O., Dickel, D. E., Kusenda, M., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.474 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Autistic-like social behaviour in Shank2-mutant mice improved by restoring NMDA receptor function
Won, H., Lee, H.-R., Gee, H. Y., Mah, W., Kim, J.-I., Lee, J., Ha, S., Chung, C., Jung, E. S., Cho, Y. S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11208 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
Association Between Microdeletion and Microduplication at 16p11.2 and Autism
Weiss, L. A., Shen, Y., Korn, J. M., Arking, D. E., Miller, D. T., Fossdal, R., Sæmundsen, E., Stefánsson, H., Ferreira, M. A. R., Green, T. J., et al. (2008) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000316305.61461.6f · Cited by 647 · see citing works
Activity-dependent regulation of inhibitory synapse development by Npas4
Lin, Y., Bloodgood, B. L., Hauser, J. L., Lapan, A. D., Koon, A. C., Kim, T.-K., Hu, L. S., Malik, A. N., & Greenberg, M. E. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07319 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Shinawi, M., Liu, P., Kang, S.-H. L., Shen, J., Belmont, J. W., Scott, D. A., Probst, F. J., Craigen, W. J., Graham, B. H., Pursley, A., et al. (2010) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.073015 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Stessman, H. A. F., Xiong, B., Coe, B. P., Wang, T., Hoekzema, K., Fenckova, M., Kvarnung, M., Gerdts, J., Trinh, S., Cosemans, N., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3792 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2
Walters, R. G., Jacquemont, S., Valsesia, A., de Smith, A. J., Martinet, D., Andersson, J., Falchi, M., Chen, F., Andrieux, J., Lobbens, S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08727 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia
Owen, M. J., O'Donovan, M. C., Thapar, A., & Craddock, N. (2011) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.084384 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Chronic Pharmacological mGlu5 Inhibition Corrects Fragile X in Adult Mice
Michalon, A., Sidorov, M., Ballard, T. M., Ozmen, L., Spooren, W., Wettstein, J. G., Jaeschke, G., Bear, M. F., & Lindemann, L. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.009 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus
Jacquemont, S., Reymond, A., Zufferey, F., Harewood, L., Walters, R. G., Kutalik, Z., Martinet, D., Shen, Y., Valsesia, A., Beckmann, N. D., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10406 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Estimates of penetrance for recurrent pathogenic copy-number variations
Rosenfeld, J. A., Coe, B. P., Eichler, E. E., Cuckle, H., & Shaffer, L. G. (2013) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2012.164 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Antoine, M. W., Langberg, T., Schnepel, P., & Feldman, D. E. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.026 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
KCTD13 is a major driver of mirrored neuroanatomical phenotypes of the 16p11.2 copy number variant
Golzio, C., Willer, J., Talkowski, M. E., Oh, E. C., Taniguchi, Y., Jacquemont, S., Reymond, A., Sun, M., Sawa, A., Gusella, J. F., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11091 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Drug development for neurodevelopmental disorders: lessons learned from fragile X syndrome
Berry-Kravis, E. M., Lindemann, L., Jønch, A. E., Apostol, G., Bear, M. F., Carpenter, R. L., Crawley, J. N., Curie, A., Des Portes, V., Hossain, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.221 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Fernandez, B. A., Roberts, W., Chung, B., Weksberg, R., Meyn, S., Szatmari, P., Joseph-George, A. M., MacKay, S., Whitten, K., Noble, B., et al. (2010) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.069369 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism
Horev, G., Ellegood, J., Lerch, J. P., Son, Y.-E. E., Muthuswamy, L., Vogel, H., Krieger, A. M., Buja, A., Henkelman, R. M., Wigler, M., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1114042108 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders
Zufferey, F., Sherr, E. H., Beckmann, N. D., Hanson, E., Maillard, A. M., Hippolyte, L., Macé, A., Ferrari, C., Kutalik, Z., Andrieux, J., et al. (2012) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101203 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
The activity-dependent transcription factor NPAS4 regulates domain-specific inhibition
Bloodgood, B. L., Sharma, N., Browne, H. A., Trepman, A. Z., & Greenberg, M. E. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12743 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Rates, distribution and implications of postzygotic mosaic mutations in autism spectrum disorder
Lim, E. T., Uddin, M., De Rubeis, S., Chan, Y., Kamumbu, A. S., Zhang, X., D'Gama, A. M., Kim, S. N., Hill, R. S., Goldberg, A. P., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4598 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Ellegood, J., Anagnostou, E., Babineau, B. A., Crawley, J. N., Lin, L., Genestine, M., DiCicco-Bloom, E., Lai, J. K. Y., Foster, J. A., Peñagarikano, O., et al. (2015) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2014.98 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Bijlsma, E. K., Gijsbers, A. C. J., Schuurs-Hoeijmakers, J. H. M., van Haeringen, A., Fransen van de Putte, D. E., Anderlid, B.-M., Lundin, J., Lapunzina, P., Pérez Jurado, L. A., Delle Chiaie, B., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.03.006 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Genschik, P., Sumara, I., & Lechner, E. (2013) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.173 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Defining the effect of the 16p11.2 duplication on cognition, behavior, and medical comorbidities
D’Angelo, D., Lebon, S., Chen, Q., Martin-Brevet, S., Snyder, L. G., Hippolyte, L., Hanson, E., Maillard, A. M., Faucett, W. A., Macé, A., et al. (2016) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2123 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Hanson, E., Bernier, R., Porche, K., Jackson, F. I., Goin-Kochel, R. P., Snyder, L. G., Snow, A. V., Wallace, A. S., Campe, K. L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2015) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.021 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Discovery of a previously unrecognized microdeletion syndrome of 16p11.2–p12.2
Ballif, B. C., Hornor, S. A., Jenkins, E., Madan‐Khetarpal, S., Surti, U., Jackson, K. E., Asamoah, A., Brock, P. L., Gowans, G. C., Conway, R. L., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2107 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Portmann, T., Yang, M., Mao, R., Panagiotakos, G., Ellegood, J., Dolen, G., Bader, P. L., Grueter, B. A., Goold, C., Fisher, E., et al. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.036 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Qin, L., Ma, K., Wang, Z.-J., Hu, Z., Matas, E., Wei, J., & Yan, Z. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0110-8 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationSteinman, K. J., Spence, S. J., Ramocki, M. B., Proud, M. B., Kessler, S. K., Marco, E. J., Green Snyder, L., D'Angelo, D., Chen, Q., Chung, W. K., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37820 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity
16p11.2 European Consortium, Maillard, A. M., Ruef, A., Pizzagalli, F., Migliavacca, E., Hippolyte, L., Adaszewski, S., Dukart, J., Ferrari, C., Conus, P., et al. (2015) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2014.145 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Copy number variations in neurodevelopmental disorders
Grayton, H. M., Fernandes, C., Rujescu, D., & Collier, D. A. (2012) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.07.005 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Pucilowska, J., Vithayathil, J., Tavares, E. J., Kelly, C., Karlo, J. C., & Landreth, G. E. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4864-13.2015 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Rosenfeld, J. A., Coppinger, J., Bejjani, B. A., Girirajan, S., Eichler, E. E., Shaffer, L. G., & Ballif, B. C. (2010) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s11689-009-9037-4 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
NMDA receptor dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders
Lee, E.-J., Choi, S. Y., & Kim, E. (2015) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2014.10.007 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Opposing Brain Differences in 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Carriers
Qureshi, A. Y., Mueller, S., Snyder, A. Z., Mukherjee, P., Berman, J. I., Roberts, T. P. L., Nagarajan, S. S., Spiro, J. E., Chung, W. K., Sherr, E. H., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1366-14.2014 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Medical consequences of pathogenic CNVs in adults: analysis of the UK Biobank
Crawford, K., Bracher-Smith, M., Owen, D., Kendall, K. M., Rees, E., Pardiñas, A. F., Einon, M., Escott-Price, V., Walters, J. T. R., O’Donovan, M. C., et al. (2019) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105477 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Oligogenic heterozygosity in individuals with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders
Schaaf, C. P., Sabo, A., Sakai, Y., Crosby, J., Muzny, D., Hawes, A., Lewis, L., Akbar, H., Varghese, R., Boerwinkle, E., et al. (2011) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr243 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Richter, M., Murtaza, N., Scharrenberg, R., White, S. H., Johanns, O., Walker, S., Yuen, R. K. C., Schwanke, B., Bedürftig, B., Henis, M., et al. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0025-5 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Borrie, S. C., Brems, H., Legius, E., & Bagni, C. (2017) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-091416-035332 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Kctd13 deletion reduces synaptic transmission via increased RhoA
Escamilla, C. O., Filonova, I., Walker, A. K., Xuan, Z. X., Holehonnur, R., Espinosa, F., Liu, S., Thyme, S. B., López-García, I. A., Mendoza, D. B., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24470 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
The genetics of neurodevelopmental disease
Mitchell, K. J. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.009 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Psychiatric disorders in children with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication
Niarchou, M., Chawner, S. J. R. A., Doherty, J. L., Maillard, A. M., Jacquemont, S., Chung, W. K., Green-Snyder, L., Bernier, R. A., Goin-Kochel, R. P., Hanson, E., et al. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0339-8 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Lin, G. N., Corominas, R., Lemmens, I., Yang, X., Tavernier, J., Hill, D. E., Vidal, M., Sebat, J., & Iakoucheva, L. M. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.010 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Arbogast, T., Ouagazzal, A.-M., Chevalier, C., Kopanitsa, M., Afinowi, N., Migliavacca, E., Cowling, B. S., Birling, M.-C., Champy, M.-F., Reymond, A., et al. (2016) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005709 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Cellular phenotypes in human iPSC-derived neurons from a genetic model of autism spectrum disorder
Deshpande, A., Yadav, S., Dao, D. Q., Wu, Z.-Y., Hokanson, K. C., Cahill, M. K., Wiita, A. P., Jan, Y.-N., Ullian, E. M., & Weiss, L. A. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.037 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Blumenthal, I., Ragavendran, A., Erdin, S., Klei, L., Sugathan, A., Guide, J. R., Manavalan, P., Zhou, J. Q., Wheeler, V. C., Levin, J. Z., et al. (2014) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.05.004 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Association of Rare Copy Number Variants With Risk of Depression
Kendall, K. M., Rees, E., Bracher-Smith, M., Legge, S., Riglin, L., Zammit, S., O’Donovan, M. C., Owen, M. J., Jones, I., Kirov, G., et al. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0566 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
TAOK2 Kinase Mediates PSD95 Stability and Dendritic Spine Maturation through Septin7 Phosphorylation
Yadav, S., Osés-Prieto, J. A., Peters, C. J., Zhou, J., Pleasure, S. J., Burlingame, A. L., Jan, L. Y., & Jan, Y. N. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.006 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Understanding sex bias in autism spectrum disorder
Werling, D. M., & Geschwind, D. H. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1301602110 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
An assessment of sex bias in neurodevelopmental disorders
Polyak, A., Rosenfeld, J. A., & Girirajan, S. (2015) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0216-5 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Gudmundsson, O. O., Walters, G. B., Ingason, A., Johansson, S., Zayats, T., Athanasiu, L., Sonderby, I. E., Gustafsson, O., Nawaz, M. S., Jonsson, G. F., et al. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0599-y · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Cognitive and behavioral characterization of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome
Hanson, E., Nasir, R. H., Fong, A., Lian, A., Hundley, R., Shen, Y., Wu, B.-L., Holm, I. A., & Miller, D. T. (2010) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/dbp.0b013e3181ea50ed · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Bertero, A., Liska, A., Pagani, M., Parolisi, R., Masferrer, M. E., Gritti, M., Pedrazzoli, M., Galbusera, A., Sarica, A., Cerasa, A., et al. (2018) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awy111 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Sahoo, T., Theisen, A., Rosenfeld, J. A., Lamb, A. N., Ravnan, J. B., Schultz, R. A., Torchia, B. S., Neill, N., Casci, I., Bejjani, B. A., et al. (2011) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/gim.0b013e3182217a06 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Aberrant white matter microstructure in children with 16p11.2 deletions
Owen, J. P., Chang, Y. S., Pojman, N. J., Bukshpun, P., Wakahiro, M. L. J., Marco, E. J., Berman, J. I., Spiro, J. E., Chung, W. K., Buckner, R. L., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4495-13.2014 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Brunner, D., Kabitzke, P., He, D., Cox, K., Thiede, L., Hanania, T., Sabath, E., Alexandrov, V., Saxe, M., Peles, E., et al. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134572 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
NMDA RECEPTOR DYSFUNCTION IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS
Kim, E. (2023) · IBRO Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.08.2041 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Dong, Z., Chen, W., Chen, C., Wang, H., Cui, W., Tan, Z., Robinson, H., Gao, N., Luo, B., Zhang, L., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.035 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Contribution of mGluR5 to pathophysiology in a mouse model of human chromosome 16p11.2 microdeletion
Tian, D., Stoppel, L. J., Heynen, A. J., Lindemann, L., Jaeschke, G., Mills, A. A., & Bear, M. F. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3911 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Common variant at 16p11.2 conferring risk of psychosis
Steinberg, S., de Jong, S., Mattheisen, M., Costas, J., Demontis, D., Jamain, S., Pietiläinen, O. P. H., Lin, K., Papiol, S., Huttenlocher, J., et al. (2014) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2012.157 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Yang, M., Mahrt, E. J., Lewis, F., Foley, G., Portmann, T., Dolmetsch, R. E., Portfors, C. V., & Crawley, J. N. (2015) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1465 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Male-specific deficits in natural reward learning in a mouse model of neurodevelopmental disorders
Grissom, N. M., McKee, S. E., Schoch, H., Bowman, N., Havekes, R., O'Brien, W. T., Mahrt, E., Siegel, S., Commons, K., Portfors, C., et al. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2017.184 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Stoppel, L. J., Kazdoba, T. M., Schaffler, M. D., Preza, A. R., Heynen, A., Crawley, J. N., & Bear, M. F. (2018) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2017.236 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The number of genomic copies at the 16p11.2 locus modulates language, verbal memory, and inhibition
Hippolyte, L., Maillard, A. M., Rodriguez-Herreros, B., Pain, A., Martin-Brevet, S., Ferrari, C., Conus, P., Macé, A., Hadjikhani, N., Metspalu, A., et al. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.10.021 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Hyperactivity and male‐specific sleep deficits in the 16p11.2 deletion mouse model of autism
Angelakos, C. C., Watson, A. J., O'Brien, W. T., Krainock, K. S., Nickl‐Jockschat, T., & Abel, T. (2017) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1707 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Reciprocal white matter alterations due to 16p11.2 chromosomal deletions versus duplications
Chang, Y. S., Owen, J. P., Pojman, N. J., Thieu, T., Bukshpun, P., Wakahiro, M. L. J., Marco, E. J., Berman, J. I., Spiro, J. E., Chung, W. K., et al. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23211 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Deep phenotyping of speech and language skills in individuals with 16p11.2 deletion
Mei, C., Fedorenko, E., Amor, D. J., Boys, A., Hoeflin, C., Carew, P., Burgess, T., Fisher, S. E., & Morgan, A. T. (2018) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-018-0102-x · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Blizinsky, K. D., Diaz-Castro, B., Forrest, M. P., Schürmann, B., Bach, A. P., Martin-de-Saavedra, M. D., Wang, L., Csernansky, J. G., Duan, J., & Penzes, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1607014113 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Martin-Brevet, S., Rodríguez-Herreros, B., Nielsen, J. A., Moreau, C., Modenato, C., Maillard, A. M., Pain, A., Richetin, S., Jønch, A. E., Qureshi, A. Y., et al. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.02.1176 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
A highly penetrant form of childhood apraxia of speech due to deletion of 16p11.2
Fedorenko, E. G., Morgan, A. T., Murray, E. L., Cardinaux, A. L., Mei, C., Tager-Flusberg, H. B., Fisher, S. E., & Kanwisher, N. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.149 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Barber, J. C. K., Hall, V., Maloney, V. K., Huang, S., Roberts, A. M., Brady, A. F., Foulds, N., Bewes, B., Volleth, M., Liehr, T., et al. (2013) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.144 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Rapanelli, M., Tan, T., Wang, W., Wang, X., Wang, Z.-J., Zhong, P., Frick, L., Qin, L., Ma, K., Qu, J., et al. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0498-x · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, W., Rein, B., Zhang, F., Tan, T., Zhong, P., Qin, L., & Yan, Z. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0149-18.2018 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, M., Lewis, F. C., Sarvi, M. S., Foley, G. M., & Crawley, J. N. (2015) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.039602.115 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Dose response of the 16p11.2 distal copy number variant on intracranial volume and basal ganglia
Sønderby, I. E., Gústafsson, Ó., Doan, N. T., Hibar, D. P., Martin-Brevet, S., Abdellaoui, A., Ames, D., Amunts, K., Andersson, M., Armstrong, N. J., et al. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0118-1 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
An estimation of the prevalence of genomic disorders using chromosomal microarray data
Gillentine, M. A., Lupo, P. J., Stankiewicz, P., & Schaaf, C. P. (2018) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s10038-018-0451-x · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Autism spectrum disorder, developmental and psychiatric features in 16p11.2 duplication
on behalf of the Simons VIP consortium, Green Snyder, L., D’Angelo, D., Chen, Q., Bernier, R., Goin-Kochel, R. P., Wallace, A. S., Gerdts, J., Kanne, S., Berry, L., et al. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2807-4 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Horder, J., Andersson, M., Mendez, M. A., Singh, N., Tangen, Ä., Lundberg, J., Gee, A., Halldin, C., Veronese, M., Bölte, S., et al. (2018) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aam8434 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Rein, B., Tan, T., Yang, F., Wang, W., Williams, J., Zhang, F., Mills, A., & Yan, Z. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0693-9 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationYufune, S., Satoh, Y., Takamatsu, I., Ohta, H., Kobayashi, Y., Takaenoki, Y., Pagès, G., Pouysségur, J., Endo, S., & Kazama, T. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep10252 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Kumar, V. J., Grissom, N. M., McKee, S. E., Schoch, H., Bowman, N., Havekes, R., Kumar, M., Pickup, S., Poptani, H., Reyes, T. M., et al. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0157-z · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Kctd13-deficient mice display short-term memory impairment and sex-dependent genetic interactions
Arbogast, T., Razaz, P., Ellegood, J., McKinstry, S. U., Erdin, S., Currall, B., Aneichyk, T., Lerch, J. P., Qiu, L. R., Rodriguiz, R. M., et al. (2019) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy436 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Abnormal speech motor control in individuals with 16p11.2 deletions
Demopoulos, C., Kothare, H., Mizuiri, D., Henderson-Sabes, J., Fregeau, B., Tjernagel, J., Houde, J. F., Sherr, E. H., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19751-x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Owen, J. P., Bukshpun, P., Pojman, N., Thieu, T., Chen, Q., Lee, J., D’Angelo, D., Glenn, O. A., Hunter, J. V., Berman, J. I., et al. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162934 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Rare and common variants at 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia
Chang, H., Li, L., Li, M., & Xiao, X. (2017) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.11.031 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Bristow, G. C., Thomson, D. M., Openshaw, R. L., Mitchell, E. J., Pratt, J. A., Dawson, N., & Morris, B. J. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107536 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Hudac, C. M., Bove, J., Barber, S., Duyzend, M., Wallace, A., Martin, C. L., Ledbetter, D. H., Hanson, E., Goin‐Kochel, R. P., Green‐Snyder, L., et al. (2020) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2332 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Filges, I., Sparagana, S., Sargent, M., Selby, K., Schlade‐Bartusiak, K., Lueder, G. T., Robichaux‐Viehoever, A., Schlaggar, B. L., Shimony, J. S., & Shinawi, M. (2014) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36605 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Yang, M., Lewis, F., Foley, G., & Crawley, J. N. (2015) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.04.023 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Agarwalla, S., Arroyo, N. S., Long, N. E., O'Brien, W. T., Abel, T., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2020) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12681 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Lu, H.-C., Pollack, H., Lefante, J. J., Mills, A. A., & Tian, D. (2019) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy253 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Psychotic symptoms in 16p11.2 copy‐number variant carriers
Jutla, A., Turner, J. B., Green Snyder, L., Chung, W. K., & Veenstra‐VanderWeele, J. (2020) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2232 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Cárdenas-de-la-Parra, A., Martin-Brevet, S., Moreau, C., Rodriguez-Herreros, B., Fonov, V. S., Maillard, A. M., Zürcher, N. R., Addor, M.-C., Andrieux, J., Arveiler, B., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116155 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Quantitative gait assessment in children with 16p11.2 syndrome
Goldman, S., McCullough, A. K., Young, S. D., Mueller, C., Stahl, A., Zoeller, A., Abbruzzese, L. D., Rao, A. K., & Montes, J. (2019) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-019-9286-9 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Longitudinal report of child with de novo 16p11.2 triplication
Wallace, A. S., Hudac, C. M., Steinman, K. J., Peterson, J. L., DesChamps, T. D., Duyzend, M. H., Nuttle, X., Eichler, E. E., & Bernier, R. A. (2018) · Clinical Case Reports · doi:10.1002/ccr3.1236 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Erratum: A highly penetrant form of childhood apraxia of speech due to deletion of 16p11.2
Fedorenko, E., Morgan, A., Murray, E., Cardinaux, A., Mei, C., Tager-Flusberg, H., Fisher, S. E., & Kanwisher, N. (2016) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.230 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zhou, W., Shi, Y., Li, F., Wu, X., Huai, C., Shen, L., Yi, Z., He, L., Liu, C., & Qin, S. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.049 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yan, Z., & Rein, B. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01092-3 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, X., Wang, B., Wu, C., Wang, J., & Sun, M. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24031819 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
The contribution of copy number variants to psychiatric symptoms and cognitive ability
Mollon, J., Almasy, L. A., Jacquemont, S., & Glahn, D. C. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-01978-4 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Developmental Disruptions of the Dorsal Striatum in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Evans, M. M., Kim, J., Abel, T. G., Nickl‐Jockschat, T., & Stevens, H. E. (2023) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.08.015 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations
Riant, F., Roos, C., Roubertie, A., Barbance, C., Hadjadj, J., Auvin, S., Baille, G., Beltramone, M., Boulanger, C., Cahn, A., et al. (2021) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000012947 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Jiang, J. W., Wang, D., Jiang, Y., Yang, X., Sun, R., Chang, J., Wenhui, Z., Yao, P., Song, K., Chang, S., et al. (2024) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-024-01755-7 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Nussinov, R., Yavuz, B. R., Arici, M. K., Demirel, H. C., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Tsai, C., Jang, H., & Tunçbağ, N. (2023) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-023-01054-9 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Smolen, C., Jensen, M., Dyer, L. M., Pizzo, L., Tyryshkina, A., Banerjee, D., Rohan, L., Huber, E., Khattabi, L. E., Prontera, P., et al. (2023) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.10.015 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Complexity in Genetic Epilepsies: A Comprehensive Review
Rastin, C., Schenkel, L. C., & Sadiković, B. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241914606 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Gu, J., Ke, P., Guo, H., Liu, J., Liu, Y., Tian, X., Huang, Z., Xu, X. Y., Xu, D., Ma, Y., et al. (2023) · Cell Death and Differentiation · doi:10.1038/s41418-023-01174-5 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Hasegawa, Y., Kim, J., Ursini, G., Jouroukhin, Y., Zhu, X., Miyahara, Y., Xiong, F., Madireddy, S., Obayashi, M., Lutz, B., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42276-5 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Recent Developments in Autism Genetic Research: A Scientometric Review from 2018 to 2022
Lim, M., Carollo, A., Dimitriou, D., & Esposito, G. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13091646 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Genetic outcomes in children with developmental language disorder: a systematic review
van Wijngaarden, V., de Wilde, H., van der Molen, D. R. M., Petter, J., Stegeman, I., Gerrits, E., Smit, A. L., & van den Boogaard, M. H. (2024) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2024.1315229 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Deutsch, S. I., Luyo, Z. N. M., & Burket, J. A. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12020181 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Leone, R., Zuglian, C., Brambilla, R., & Morella, I. (2024) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1407865 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Mechanisms of copy number variants in neuropsychiatric disorders: From genes to therapeutics
Forrest, M. P., & Penzes, P. (2023) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2023.102750 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Discovering the gene-brain-behavior link in autism via generative machine learning
Kundu, S., Sair, H. I., Sherr, E. H., Mukherjee, P., & Rohde, G. K. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adl5307 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Kim, J., Vanrobaeys, Y. S., Kelvington, B. A., Peterson, Z. J., Baldwin, E., Gaine, M. E., Nickl‐Jockschat, T., & Abel, T. G. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02411-0 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Social behavior in 16p11.2 and 22q11.2 copy number variations: Insights from mice and humans
Benedetti, A., Molent, C., Barcik, W., & Papaleo, F. (2021) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12787 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Chen, X., Lin, D., Ye, Y., Zhang, X., & Chen, D. (2022) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-022-02594-1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
The pleiotropic spectrum of proximal 16p11.2 CNVs
Auwerx, C., Kutalik, Z., & Reymond, A. (2024) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.015 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Haplotype-specific MAPK3 expression in 16p11.2 deletion contributes to variable neurodevelopment
Liu, F., Chen, L., Li, Z., Zhao, S., Yuan, H., Yao, R., Qin, Z., Shangguan, S., Zhang, S., Zou, L., et al. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad071 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Fetit, R., Barbato, M. I., Theil, T., Pratt, T., & Price, D. J. (2023) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.201227 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Wang, W., Tan, T., Cao, Q., Zhang, F., Rein, B. A., Duan, W., & Yan, Z. (2022) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyac048 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic advances in neurodevelopmental disorders
Gao, S., Shan, C., Zhang, R., & Wang, T. (2024) · Medical Review · doi:10.1515/mr-2024-0040 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Liu, L., Wang, J., Liu, X., Wang, J., Chen, L., Zhu, H., Mai, J., Hu, T., & Liu, S. (2023) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2023.117671 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Wang, Q.-W., Qin, J., Chen, Y., Tu, Y., Xing, Y.-Y., Wang, Y., Yang, L.-Y., Lu, S., Geng, L., Shi, W., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112691 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Rosenberg, A. G. W., Pater, M. R. A., Pellikaan, K., Davidse, K., Kattentidt‐Mouravieva, A. A., Kersseboom, R., Bos‐Roubos, A. G., van Eeghen, A. M., Veen-Roelofs, J. M. C., van der Meulen, J. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10225457 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Giovanniello, J. R., Ahrens, S., Yu, K., & Li, B. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.01.001 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Jeong, J., Yoo, H. J., An, J., & Jeong-Yu, S. (2025) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.mocell.2025.100237 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Ju, J., Pan, Y., Yang, X., Li, X., Chen, J., Wu, S., & Hou, S. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2411080122 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Ju, J., Li, X., Pan, Y., Du, J., Yang, X., Men, S., Liu, B., Zhang, Z., Zhong, H., Mai, J., et al. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02596-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Clinical and Neurobiological Aspects of TAO Kinase Family in Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Hu, C., Feng, P., Yang, Q., & Xiao, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2021.655037 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication
Smith, H. L., Lane, C., Al‐Jawahiri, R., & Freeth, M. (2022) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2802 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Komatsu, K., Fukumura, S., Minagawa, K., et al. (2022) · Brain and Development · doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2022.03.008 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Pre-autism: What a paediatrician should know about early diagnosis of autism
Al‐Beltagi, M. (2023) · World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.5409/wjcp.v12.i5.273 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The Evolving Landscape of Functional Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Ranjan, J., & Bhattacharya, A. (2025) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells14120908 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Prenatally diagnosed 16p11.2 copy number variations by SNP Array: A retrospective case series
Liu, N., Li, H., Li, M., Gao, Y., & Yan, H. (2022) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2022.10.016 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Brain region and gene dosage-differential transcriptomic changes in Shank2-mutant mice
Yoo, Y.-E., Yoo, T., Kang, H., & Kim, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.977305 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Inhibition of histone deacetylase 5 ameliorates abnormalities in 16p11.2 duplication mouse model
Rein, B. A., Conrow‐Graham, M., Frazier, A., Cao, Q., & Yan, Z. (2021) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108893 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationWakatsuki, S., & Araki, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2021.748721 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Sylvester, A. L., Hensenne, E., Ivanov, D., Poser, B. A., Linden, D. E. J., van Amelsvoort, T., & Vingerhoets, C. (2025) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-025-09614-8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Prenatal phenotypes and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with 16p11.2 microdeletion/microduplication
Yue, F., Hao, M., Jiang, D., et al. (2024) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06702-w · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Zhang, F., Yang, X., Jiang, Y., Mao, X., Liu, H., Yang, Y., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Li, H., Zhang, X., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1331130 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Patient Brain Organoids Identify a Link between the 16p11.2 Copy Number Variant and the RBFOX1 Gene
Kostic, M., Raymond, J. J., Freyre, C. A. C., Henry, B., Tumkaya, T., Khlghatyan, J., Dvornik, J., Li, J., Hsiao, J. S., Cheon, S. H., et al. (2023) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00442 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Choi, Y. B., Mentch, J., Haskins, A. J., Wicklin, C. V., & Robertson, C. E. (2023) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2901 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Hayashi, Y., Kushima, I., Aleksić, B., et al. (2021) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13324 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Özaslan, A., Kayhan, G., İşeri, E., Ergün, M. A., Güney, E., & Perçin, E. F. (2021) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-021-06745-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The expanding landscape of genetic causes of obesity
Semenova, E., Guo, A., Liang, H., Hernandez, C. J., John, E. B., & Thaker, V. (2024) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-024-03780-6 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Li, W., Kong, Q., Tian, P., Wang, L., Jin, X. Y., Zhao, J., Zhang, H., Chen, W., & Wang, G. (2024) · Food Frontiers · doi:10.1002/fft2.380 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Rusu, A., Chevalier, C., de Chaumont, F., Nalesso, V., Brault, V., Hérault, Y., & Ey, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1294558 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Warren, E. B., Briano, J. A., Ellegood, J., DeYoung, T., Lerch, J. P., & Morrow, E. M. (2022) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.049752 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Malijauskaite, S., Sauer, A. K., Hickey, S., Franzoni, M., Grabrucker, A. M., & McGourty, K. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04617-3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Paroxysmal Kinesigenic Dyskinesia Caused by 16p11.2 Microdeletion and Related Clinical Features
Chen, Y.-L., Chen, D.-F., Ke, H.-Z., Zhao, S.-Y., Li, H.-F., & Wu, Z.-Y. (2022) · Neurology Genetics · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000000659 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Mkhitaryan, M., Avetisyan, T., Yeritsyan, H., Harutyunyan, H. A., & Yenkoyan, K. B. (2025) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.70801 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Hu, B., Yin, M.-Y., Zhang, C., Shi, Z., Wang, L., Lei, X., Li, M., Li, S. L., & Tuo, Q. (2025) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105645 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Elsayed, L. E. O., AlHarbi, N. A., Alqarni, A. M., Eltayeb, H. H. E., Mostafa, N. M. M., Abdulrahim, M. M., Zaid, H. I. B., Alanzi, L. M., Ababtain, S. A., Aldulaijan, K., et al. (2024) · Human Genomics · doi:10.1186/s40246-024-00662-0 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Effects of paternal ionizing radiation exposure on fertility and offspring's health
Li, J., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Qiu, H., Zheng, J., Xue, J., Jin, J., Ni, F.-D., Zhang, C., Chen, C., et al. (2024) · Reproductive Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1002/rmb2.12567 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Antony, I., Narasimhan, M., Shen, R., Prakasam, R., Kaushik, K., Chapman, G., & Kroll, K. L. (2022) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1007/s12015-022-10475-0 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Zheng, S., & Chen, C. (2025) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-025-02919-x · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Motor difficulties in 16p11.2 copy number variation
Jutla, A., Harvey, L., Veenstra-VanderWeele, J. M., & Chung, W. K. (2024) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.3132 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Han, J. Y., Cho, Y. G., Jo, D. S., & Park, J. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25010253 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Smolen, C., Jensen, M., Dyer, L. M., Pizzo, L., Tyryshkina, A., Banerjee, D., Rohan, L., Huber, E., Khattabi, L. E., Prontera, P., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.05.18.23290169 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Li, M., Liu, L., Wu, Y., & Guan, J. (2022) · Journal of International Medical Research · doi:10.1177/03000605221109400 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Thorpe, H. H. A., Cupertino, R. B., Pakala, S. R., Fontanillas, P., Jennings, M. V., Yang, J., Meredith, J. J., Greenwood, T. A., Bianchi, S. B., Vilar‐Ribó, L., et al. (2025) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-025-03356-8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ward, T. R., Qu, P.-P., Leung, L. C., Zhou, B., Muench, K. L., Khechaduri, A., Plastini, M. J., Charlton, C. A., Pattni, R., Ho, S. S., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-025-01856-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Du, Q., Yu, M., Shi, L., Fan, R., Liu, K., & Xiang, B. (2025) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaf092 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Tumors and their microenvironments: Learning from pediatric brain pathologies
Nussinov, R., Yavuz, B. R., & Jang, H. (2025) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2025.189328 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Duan, J., Zeng, D., Wu, T., Luo, Z., Jingwen, G., Tan, W., & Zeng, Y. (2025) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2025.102759 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kushima, I., Nakatochi, M., & Ozaki, N. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.11.019 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kim, J., Vanrobaeys, Y. S., Davatolhagh, M. F., Kelvington, B. A., Chatterjee, S., Ferri, S. L., Angelakos, C. C., Mills, A. A., Fuccillo, M. V., Nickl‐Jockschat, T., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.17.594746 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Nascimento, L. P. C., Mergener, R., Nunes, M. R., Muniz, V. F., Catão, J. R., Böttcher, A. K., Dorfman, L. E., Graziadio, C., & Zen, P. R. G. (2023) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes14081583 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The neurobiology of autism spectrum disorder as it relates to twice exceptionality
Sharkey, R. J., & Nickl‐Jockschat, T. (2023) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107740 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wahbeh, M. H., Peng, X., Bacharaki, S., Hatzimanolis, A., Dimitrakopoulos, S., Wohler, E., Yang, X., Yovo, C., Maher, B. J., Sobreira, N. L. D. M., et al. (2023) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes14010177 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Keeping the balance: Trade-offs between human brain evolution, autism, and schizophrenia
Duński, E., & Pękowska, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.1009390 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Sen, K., Genser, I., Difazio, M. P., & DiSabella, M. (2022) · Neuropediatrics · doi:10.1055/a-1863-1798 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Nomura, Y., Nomura, J., Kamiguchi, H., Nishikawa, T., & Takumi, T. (2021) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2021.03.005 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ahmmad, M. R., Pantazopoulos, H., & Kothiya, S. H. (2026) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.reia.2026.202826 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
16p11.2 duplication syndrome-associated psychosis: An illustrative case and review of the literature
Colijn, M. A. (2024) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.006 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Dugan, G., Akula, N., Marenco, S., Auluck, P. K., Raznahan, A., Liu, S., DeCasien, A. R., Xu, Q., Feng, N., Kolachana, B. S., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.19.613680 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Verbesselt, J., Walsh, L. K., Mitchel, M. W., Taylor, C. M., Finucane, B. M., Breckpot, J., Zink, I., & Swillen, A. (2024) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/jir.13141 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Differential processing of delay versus uncertainty in male but not female 16p11.2 hemideletion micePreprint
Rojas, G. R., Heller, A. T., & Grissom, N. M. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.04.560951 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Badar, S. A., Breman, A. M., Christensen, C. K., et al. (2022) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000521297 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Yao, R., Zhou, Y., Tang, J., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.782419 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
How copy number variations shape brain developmental disorders: Unraveling the synaptic puzzle
Wang, T., TRABZONLU, K., Jones, E. F., & Syed, Y. A. (2025) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.70009 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Forrest, M. P., Piguel, N. H., Bagchi, V., Dionisio, L., Yoon, S., Santos, M. D., LeDoux, M., & Penzes, P. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.03.06.641931 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kınalı, K. Ç., Oktay, E. Ö., & Karahan, M. (2025) · Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics · doi:10.1186/s43042-025-00644-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Neurological Insights into 16p11.2- And 22q11.2-Related Disorders: A Mini-Review
Lu, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-J., Lin, S.-J., Hsu, T., Niu, D., & Lin, W. (2025) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/0113892029338299241211063307 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Wang, T., Sharp, M., Morella, I., Bedogni, F., Trajkovski, V., Brambilla, R., & Syed, Y. A. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26020573 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Chen, K., Gao, T., Yan, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhu, K., Qi, J., Chu, Z., Wang, T., et al. (2025) · npj Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1038/s41531-024-00861-5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A Hypothesis: Metabolic Contributions to 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome
Choo, B. K. M., Barnes, S., & Sive, H. L. (2024) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.202400177 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Verbesselt, J., Breckpot, J., Zink, I., & Swillen, A. (2024) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00257 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Kim, J., Vanrobaeys, Y. S., Peterson, Z. J., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.02.09.527866 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Development and Developmental Disorders of the Cerebral Cortex
ten Donkelaar, H. J., Vasung, L., Molnár, Z., Aronica, E., Lammens, M. M. Y., van Bokhoven, H., Ulzen, K. K.-V., & Hori, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26098-8_10 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liu, F., Chen, L., Li, Z., Zhao, S., Shangguan, S., Yuan, H., Yao, R., Qin, Z., Zhang, S., Zou, L., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.10.498576 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Esposito, C. M., Enrico, P., Sciortino, D., Caletti, E., Marchetti, G. B., Cesaretti, C., Oldani, L., Fiorentini, A., & Brambilla, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.689359 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Autism Spectrum Disorder: Integrating Genetic and Environmental Risk
Kamijo, S., Miwa, H., & Ikeda, K. (2026) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells15110985 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Morella, I., Hall, J., Butter, C., Goldie, C., Evans, G., Ali, N., Burlinson-Diaz, N., Burkitt‐Wright, E., Caraiscos, I., Morè, L., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.23.706592 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Rajkumar, S., Bearden, C. E., Sebat, J. L., & Iakoucheva, L. M. (2026) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2026.102441 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kim, J., Vanrobaeys, Y. S., Rajan, R., Davatolhagh, M. F., Kelvington, B. A., Chatterjee, S., Ferri, S. L., Angelakos, C. C., Mills, A. A., Fuccillo, M. V., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-68047-y · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rein, B., & Yan, Z.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rein, Benjamin
- Yan, Zhen
- Venue
- Trends in Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 886-901
- ISSN
- 0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7606557
- OpenAlex
- W3089221670
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Keywords
- neurodevelopmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, epilepsy, transgenic mouse model, social dysfunction, cognitive impairment, synaptic function, transcriptional dysregulation, therapeutic interventions
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Animals, Chromosome Deletion, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Mice, DNA Copy Number Variations, Neurodevelopmental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-04.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-04.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review