Cited by 179Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesGenomics and Rare Diseases

AGG interruptions within the maternal FMR1 gene reduce the risk of offspring with fragile X syndrome

Open access
Yrigollen, Carolyn M., Durbin-Johnson, Blythe, Gane, Louise, Nelson, David L., Hagerman, Randi, Hagerman, Paul J., Tassone, Flora·2012·Genetics in Medicine

Abstract

Purpose The ability to accurately predict the likelihood of expansion of the CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene to a full mutation is of critical importance for genetic counseling of women who are carriers of premutation alleles (55-200 CGG repeats) and who are weighing the risk of having a child with fragile X syndrome. The presence of AGG interruptions within the CGG repeat tract is thought to decrease the likelihood of expansion to a full mutation during transmission, thereby reducing risk, although their contribution has not been quantified.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 267 premutation alleles for number and position of AGG interruptions, length of pure CGG repeats, and CGG repeat lengths present in the offspring of the maternal transmissions. In addition, we determined the haplotypes of four markers flanking the 5'-UTR locus in the premutation mothers.Results We found that the presence of AGG interruptions significantly increased genetic stability, whereas specific haplotypes had a marginal association with transmission instability.Conclusion The presence of AGG interruptions reduced the risk of transmission of a full mutation for all maternal (premutation) repeat lengths below ~100 CGG repeats, with a differential risk (0 vs. 2 AGG) exceeding 60% for alleles in the 70- to 80-CGG repeat range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/gim.2012.34

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of AGG interruptions in the CGG repeat correlates inversely with the risk of expansion to a full mutation in the next generation.

    “A recent study (12) showed that the number of AGG interruptions present in the CGG repeats correlates inversely with the risk of expansion to a FM in the next generation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [29]Eichler EE Nelson DL Genetic variation and evolutionary stability of the FMR1 CGG repeat in six closed human populations Am J Med Genet 7 12 1996 64 1 220 225 8826480
  2. [33]Nolin SL Glicksman A Sherman SL AGG genotyping reclassifies expansion risk for equivalently sized intermediate and premutation fragile X alleles: outcomes of a multicenter study of 469 mother-child transmission 15th International Workshop of Fragile X and Early-Onset Cognitive Disorders Berlin, Germany 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yrigollen, C. M., Durbin-Johnson, B., Gane, L., Nelson, D. L., Hagerman, R., Hagerman, P. J., & Tassone, F.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Tassone, Flora
Venue
Genetics in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
729-736
ISSN
1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985923029
Cited by
179
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, Davis
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024146)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD040661, P30HD002274, R01HD036071)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, FMR1 gene, CGG repeat expansion, AGG interruptions, premutation, genetic counseling, repeat instability, haplotypes, 5' untranslated region, mother-to-child transmission
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Alleles, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Pedigree, Risk, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion, Penetrance, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review