Cited by 421Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesGenomics and Rare Diseases

Expansion of the Fragile X CGG Repeat in Females with Premutation or Intermediate Alleles

Open access
Nolin, Sarah L., Brown, W. Ted, Glicksman, Anne, Houck, Jr., George E., Gargano, Alice D., Sullivan, Amy, Biancalana, Valérie, Bröndum-Nielsen, Karen +12 more·2003·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

The CGG repeat in the 5' untranslated region of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) exhibits remarkable instability upon transmission from mothers with premutation alleles. A collaboration of 13 laboratories in eight countries was established to examine four issues concerning FMR1 CGG-repeat instability among females with premutation (approximately 55-200 repeats) and intermediate (approximately 46-60 repeats) alleles. Our central findings were as follows: (1) The smallest premutation alleles that expanded to a full mutation (>200 repeats) in one generation contained 59 repeats; sequence analysis of the 59-repeat alleles from these two females revealed no AGG interruptions within the FMR1 CGG repeat. (2) When we corrected for ascertainment and recalculated the risks of expansion to a full mutation, we found that the risks for premutation alleles with <100 repeats were lower than those previously published. (3) When we examined the possible influence of sex of offspring on transmission of a full mutation-by analysis of 567 prenatal fragile X studies of 448 mothers with premutation and full-mutation alleles-we found no significant differences in the proportion of full-mutation alleles in male or female fetuses. (4) When we examined 136 transmissions of intermediate alleles from 92 mothers with no family history of fragile X, we found that, in contrast to the instability observed in families with fragile X, most (99/136 [72.8%]) transmissions of intermediate alleles were stable. The unstable transmissions (37/136 [27.2%]) in these families included both expansions and contractions in repeat size. The instability increased with the larger intermediate alleles (19% for 49-54 repeats, 30.9% for 55-59, and 80% for 60-65 repeats). These studies should allow improved risk assessments for genetic counseling of women with premutation or intermediate-size alleles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/367713

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The risk of premutation-to-full-mutation transition depends on CGG repeat size, with nearly 100% risk for alleles over 99 repeats.

    “The risk of a PM to FM transition depends on the CGG repeat size, such that the expansion risk is nearly 100% for alleles of >99 CGG repeats (11).”
  • Intermediate or gray-zone alleles with 45 to 54 CGG repeats are proposed precursors of premutation alleles, potentially due to meiotic instability.

    “Alleles possessing between 45 and 54 CGG repeats, referred to as gray-zone or intermediate alleles, are proposed to be precursors of PM alleles, potentially due to paternal and maternal meiotic instability (11).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nolin, S. L., Brown, W. T., Glicksman, A., Houck, Jr., Gargano, A. D., Sullivan, A., Biancalana, V., Bröndum-Nielsen, K., Hjalgrim, H., Holinski-Feder, E., Kooy, F., Longshore, J., Macpherson, J., Mandel, J.-L., Matthijs, G., Rousseau, F., Steinbach, P., Väisänen, M.-L., von Koskull, H., & Sherman, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Kennedy Center (DK)
  • Greenwood Genetic Center (US)
  • Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory (GB)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Oulu University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Nolin, Sarah L.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
454-464
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000064832
Cited by
421
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 25
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD29909, R01HD029909)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, FMR1 gene, CGG repeat expansion, repeat instability, premutation, intermediate alleles, full mutation, mother-to-child transmission, offspring sex, repeat contraction, genetic counseling, risk assessment, prenatal diagnosis
MeSH terms
Alleles, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Mutation, Pedigree, Risk, Sex Factors, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion, 5' Untranslated Regions, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review