The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recombination suppressors and the evolution of new species
Open accessAbstract
Chromosomal rearrangements are often the only apparent difference between closely related species, although it is not clear whether they are a cause or a by-product of speciation. We suggest that changes in the pattern of recombination may provide a link between chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. In models of speciation by sexual selection and by reinforcement, recombination is a major barrier to the formation of new species, primarily because it opposes the establishment of linkage disequilibrium. Here we show that in both the Felsenstein (1981) and Kirkpatrick (1982) models, a recombination suppressor is able to enhance the processes leading to speciation and increase its own frequency in the population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, inversions can also facilitate speciation indirectly by reducing recombination between loci under divergent selection and those underlying RI (Trickett and Butlin, 1994; Kirkpatrick and Barton, 2006; Feder et al., 2011; Dagilis and Kirkpatrick, 2016; Charlesworth and Barton, 2018; Schaal et al., 2022), a genetic architecture commonly reported in plants (reviewed in Huang and Rieseberg, 20”
From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Trickett and Butlin, 1994
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits
Lande, R. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721 · Cited by 2,187
Sexual Selection, Social Competition, and Speciation
West‐Eberhard, M. J. (1983) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/413215 · Cited by 1,698
Mayr, E. W., & White, M. J. D. (1978) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2412932 · Cited by 1,251
SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE
Kirkpatrick, M. (1982) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05003.x · Cited by 1,164
SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS?
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04864.x · Cited by 1,003
Coyne, J. A. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355511a0 · Cited by 797
Effective deme sizes during long-term evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04678.x · Cited by 792
Species evolution: the role of chromosome change
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-0924 · Cited by 745
Speciation and its consequences
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2718 · Cited by 681
Butlin, R. K. (1987) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(87)90193-5 · Cited by 459
Self-citationTHE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION
Pomiankowski, A., Iwasa, Y., & Nee, S. (1991) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02645.x · Cited by 396
Smith, J. M. (1991) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91)90055-3 · Cited by 341
The theory of sexual selection
O’Donald, P. (1962) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1962.56 · Cited by 135
UNIFYING GENETIC MODELS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE
Seger, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05685.x · Cited by 110
The Origin of Diploid Neospecies in Clarkia
Lewis, H. (1973) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282824 · Cited by 98
Sturtevant, A. H., & Beadle, G. W. (1939) · Cited by 97
Factors responsible for a karyotypic polymorphism in the common shrew, Sorex araneus
Jb, S. (1986) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1986.0086 · Cited by 96
Evolution and speciation : essays in honor of M.J.D. White
White, M. J. D., Atchley, W. R., & Woodruff, D. S. (1981) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 96
Selection of new inversions in multi-locus genetic systems
Charlesworth, B., & Charlesworth, D. (1973) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300013343 · Cited by 94
Grula, J. W., & Taylor, O. R. (1980) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04007.x · Cited by 81
THE PROBABILITY OF FIXATION OF A NEW KARYOTYPE IN A CONTINUOUS POPULATION
Barton, N., & Rouhani, S. (1991) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04326.x · Cited by 56
KOLLER, P. C. (1939) · Nature · doi:10.1038/1441067a0 · Cited by 52
Female mating preference for large size in Coelopa frigida (seaweed fly)
Gilburn, A. S., Foster, S. P., & Day, T. H. (1992) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1992.118 · Cited by 45
The structure and maintenance of hybrid zones as exemplified by Podisma pedestris
Hewitt, G. M., & Barton, N. (1980) · Cited by 34
Setbacks in the search for mate-preference genes
Ritchie, M. G. (1992) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90123-s · Cited by 32
SIMULATION OF GENETIC SYSTEMS XII. MODELS OF INVERSION POLYMORPHISM
Fraser, A., & Burnell, D. G. (1967) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/57.2.267 · Cited by 20
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5 · Cited by 1,457
Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation
Kirkpatrick, M., & Barton, N. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.047985 · Cited by 1,178
The Role of Reinforcement in Speciation: Theory and Data
Servedio, M. R., & Noor, M. A. F. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412 · Cited by 961
Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species
Noor, M. A. F., Grams, K. L., Bertucci, L. A., & Reiland, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.221274498 · Cited by 911
Hoffmann, A. A., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532 · Cited by 705
Metadata
- Authors
- Trickett, A. J., & Butlin, R. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- ORCID
- Butlin, Roger K
- Venue
- Heredity
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 339-345
- ISSN
- 0018-067X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2540
- OpenAlex
- W2317036318
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Heredity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- speciation, chromosomal rearrangements, linkage disequilibrium, reinforcement, sexual selection, Kirkpatrick model, recombination suppression, speciation modeling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Computer Simulation, Biological Evolution, Chromosome Inversion, Models, Genetic, Recombination, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Suppression, Genetic, Gene Rearrangement, Likelihood Functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
