CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 361Evolution and Genetic DynamicsObesity, Physical Activity, DietGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thrifty genes for obesity, an attractive but flawed idea, and an alternative perspective: the ‘drifty gene’ hypothesis

Speakman, J R·2008·International Journal of Obesity
DOI 10.1038/ijo.2008.161
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Almost 50 years ago Neel proposed a hypothesis to explain the prevalence of obesity and diabetes in modern society--the 'thrifty gene' hypothesis. The fundamental basis of the hypothesis was that, in our early evolutionary history, genes, that promoted efficient fat deposition would have been advantageous because they allowed their holders to survive at periods of famine. In modern society, such genes are disadvantageous because they promote fat deposition in preparation for a famine that never comes, and the result is widespread obesity and diabetes. In recent years I, and others, have questioned some of the fundamental assumptions of this hypothesis--particularly focusing on whether differential survival of lean against obese in famines provides sufficient selective pressure for the spread of so-called 'thrifty genes'. These arguments have been criticized because famines not only affect survival but also fecundity, and obese people would be expected to sustain fecundity longer in the face of food shortages. In this paper, I show that the reduced fecundity argument is flawed because famines are almost universally followed by periods of enhanced fecundity, which offsets the decline observed during the famine itself. The net effect of famines on fecundity is consequently insufficient to rescue the thrifty gene idea. Elsewhere, I have suggested an alternative scenario that subsections of the population have a genetic predisposition to obesity due to an absence of selection, combined with genetic drift. The scenario presented earlier was based on evidence from prehistory concerning the release of our ancestors from heavy predation pressure around 2 million years ago. I suggest here that this is one of a number of potential scenarios based on random genetic drift that may explain the specific aetiology of the obesity epidemic. Together, these alternatives, based on central notion that genetic drift rather than positive selection was a dominant factor, may be called the 'drifty gene' hypothesis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ijo.2008.161

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 150 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Perusse L, Chagnon YC, Rice T, Rao DC, Bouchard C . Genetic epidemiology and molecular genetics of obesity: results from the Quebec Family Study. Med Sci 1998; 14: 914–924.
  2. Lev-Ran A . Thrifty genotype: how applicable is it to obesity and type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Rev 1999; 7: 1–22.
  3. Dupaquier J . L’analyse statistique des crises de mortalitie. In: Charbonneau H, LaRose A (eds). The Great Mortalities. Ordina: Liege, 1979, pp 83–112.
  4. Mokyr J, Grada CO . Famine disease and famine mortality: lessons form Ireland, 1845–1850. Centre for Economic Research Working Paper 99/12. University College: Dublin, 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 359

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Speakman, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Speakman, J R
ORCID
Speakman, J R
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-10-14
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
1611-1617
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
DOI
10.1038/ijo.2008.161
OpenAlex
W2110693856
Cited by
361
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 22
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
thrifty gene hypothesis, obesity, diabetes mellitus, famine, fecundity, genetic drift, positive selection, predation pressure, human evolution
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Fertility, Humans, Obesity, Selection, Genetic, Starvation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Drift, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review