Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabolic syndrome in young children: definitions and results of the IDEFICS study

Open access
on behalf of the IDEFICS consortium, Ahrens, W, Moreno, L A, Mårild, S, Molnár, D, Siani, A, De Henauw, S, Böhmann, J, Günther, K, Hadjigeorgiou, C, Iacoviello, L, Lissner, L, Veidebaum, T, Pohlabeln, H, Pigeot, I·2014·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) using reference standards obtained in European children and to develop a quantitative MetS score and describe its distribution in children. DESIGN AND METHODS: Population-based survey in eight European countries, including 18745 children 2.0 to 10.9 years, recruited during a second survey. Anthropometry (weight, height and waist circumference), blood pressure and serum-fasting triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, glucose and insulin were measured. We applied three widely accepted definitions of the pediatric MetS and we suggest a new definition, to guide pediatricians in decisions about close monitoring or even intervention (values of at least three of the MetS components exceeding the 90th or 95th percentile, respectively). We used a z-score standardisation to calculate a continuous score combining the MetS components. RESULTS: Among the various definitions of MetS, the highest prevalence (5.5%) was obtained with our new definition requiring close observation (monitoring level). Our more conservative definition, requiring pediatric intervention gives a prevalence of 1.8%. In general, prevalences were higher in girls than in boys. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is highest among obese children. All definitions classify a small percentage of thin or normal weight children as being affected. The metabolic syndrome score shows a positive trend with age, particularly regarding the upper percentiles of the score. CONCLUSIONS: According to different definitions of pediatric MetS, a non-negligible proportion of mostly prepubertal children are classified as affected. We propose a new definition of MetS that should improve clinical guidance. The continuous score developed may also serve as a useful tool in pediatric obesity research. It has to be noted, however, that the proposed cutoffs are based on a statistical definition that does not yet allow to quantify the risk of subsequent disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ijo.2014.130

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
on behalf of the IDEFICS consortium, Ahrens, W., Moreno, L. A., Mårild, S., Molnár, D., Siani, A., De Henauw, S., Böhmann, J., Günther, K., Hadjigeorgiou, C., Iacoviello, L., Lissner, L., Veidebaum, T., Pohlabeln, H., & Pigeot, I.
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2014-09
Volume
38
Issue
S2
Pages
S4-S14
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W1975123684
Cited by
310
References
50
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic syndrome in young children: definitions and results of the IDEFICS study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ijo.2014.130
The paper
on behalf of the IDEFICS consortium, Ahrens, W., Moreno, L. A., Mårild, S., Molnár, D., Siani, A., De Henauw, S., Böhmann, J., Günther, K., Hadjigeorgiou, C., Iacoviello, L., Lissner, L., Veidebaum, T., Pohlabeln, H., & Pigeot, I. (2014). Metabolic syndrome in young children: definitions and results of the IDEFICS study. International Journal of Obesity. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.130

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.