Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved group-specific PCR primers for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of the genetic diversity of complex microbial communities

Mühling, Martin, Woolven-Allen, John, Murrell, J Colin, Joint, Ian·2008·The ISME Journal

Abstract

Phylum- and class-specific PCR primers were tested for the production of clone libraries and for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of complex bacterial communities. Primers were designed to specifically amplify 16S rRNA gene fragments of the phyla Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes and Firmicutes, of three classes of the phylum Proteobacteria, the Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria, and of the Cyanobacteria (including chloroplast 16S rRNA genes). The specificity of the seven primer pairs was tested by producing clone libraries from environmental DNA samples from mesotrophic (Norwegian coastal) and oligotrophic (Northern Atlantic Gyre) environments. Five of the seven primer pairs specifically amplified target 16S rRNA gene sequences. Exceptions were the Betaproteobacteria- and Firmicutes-specific primers, which were relatively successful with coastal water mesocosm samples but less so with the Northern Atlantic Gyre sample. Phylogenetic analysis of sequences from the Gammaproteobacteria clone library revealed that the coastal sample yielded a number of clones that clustered within clades that belong to the oligotrophic marine Gammaproteobacteria (OMG) group, indicating that this group is not confined exclusively to the oligotrophic environment. Comparison of the bacterial diversity of the environmental DNA sample from the coastal and the open ocean using a two- or three-step nested PCR-DGGE process revealed significant differences in the bacterial communities. The application of the group-specific primers provides a higher resolution genetic fingerprinting approach than existing DGGE primer sets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ismej.2007.97

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Mühling, M., Woolven-Allen, J., Murrell, J. C., & Joint, I.
Venue
The ISME Journal
Published
2008-03-13
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
379-392
ISSN
  • 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7370
OpenAlex
W2131636459
Cited by
304
References
40
FWCI
13.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved group-specific PCR primers for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of the genetic diversity of complex microbial communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2007.97
The paper
Mühling, M., Woolven-Allen, J., Murrell, J. C., & Joint, I. (2008). Improved group-specific PCR primers for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of the genetic diversity of complex microbial communities. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.97

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.