The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective progressive response of soil microbial community to wild oat roots
Open accessAbstract
Roots moving through soil induce physical and chemical changes that differentiate rhizosphere from bulk soil, and the effects of these changes on soil microorganisms have long been a topic of interest. The use of a high-density 16S rRNA microarray (PhyloChip) for bacterial and archaeal community analysis has allowed definition of the populations that respond to the root within the complex grassland soil community; this research accompanies compositional changes reported earlier, including increases in chitinase- and protease-specific activity, cell numbers and quorum sensing signal. PhyloChip results showed a significant change compared with bulk soil in relative abundance for 7% of the total rhizosphere microbial community (147 of 1917 taxa); the 7% response value was confirmed by16S rRNA terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. This PhyloChip-defined dynamic subset was comprised of taxa in 17 of the 44 phyla detected in all soil samples. Expected rhizosphere-competent phyla, such as Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, were well represented, as were less-well-documented rhizosphere colonizers including Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Nitrospira. Richness of Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria decreased in soil near the root tip compared with bulk soil, but then increased in older root zones. Quantitative PCR revealed rhizosphere abundance of β-Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria at about 108 copies of 16S rRNA genes per g soil, with Nitrospira having about 105 copies per g soil. This report demonstrates that changes in a relatively small subset of the soil microbial community are sufficient to produce substantial changes in functions observed earlier in progressively more mature rhizosphere zones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer3 on the WWW for General Users and for Biologist Programmers
Rozen, S., & Skaletsky, H. (2003) · Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols · doi:10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365 · Cited by 15,013
Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
Self-citationPhylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation
Amann, R., Ludwig, W., & SCHLEIFER, K. H. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.59.1.143-169.1995 · Cited by 9,093
Analysis of Ecological Communities
McCune, B., & Grace, J. B. (2002) · Cited by 5,986
Analysis of Ecological Communities
Anderson, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0981(03)00091-1 · Cited by 5,086
Griffiths, R. I., Whiteley, A. S., O'Donnell, A. G., & Bailey, M. J. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.12.5488-5491.2000 · Cited by 1,676
Assessment of Soil Microbial Community Structure by Use of Taxon-Specific Quantitative PCR Assays
Fierer, N., Jackson, J. A., Vilgalys, R., & Jackson, R. B. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.7.4117-4120.2005 · Cited by 1,581
The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis
Cole, J. R. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki038 · Cited by 1,475
Microbial Ecology: Fundamentals and Applications
Atlas, R. M., & Bartha, R. (1978) · Cited by 1,255
Prokaryotic Diversity--Magnitude, Dynamics, and Controlling Factors
Torsvik, V., Øvreås, L., & Thingstad, T. F. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1071698 · Cited by 1,196
Cited by
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Zhalnina, K., Louie, K. B., Hao, Z., Mansoori, N., da Rocha, U. N., Shi, S., Cho, H., Karaoz, U., Loqué, D., Bowen, B. P., et al. (2018) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0129-3 · Cited by 2,368
Self-citationTurner, T. R., James, E. K., & Poole, P. S. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-209 · Cited by 1,349
Neonatal gut microbiota associates with childhood multisensitized atopy and T cell differentiation
Fujimura, K. E., Sitarik, A. R., Havstad, S., Lin, D. L., Levan, S., Fadrosh, D., Panzer, A. R., LaMere, B., Rackaityte, E., Lukacs, N. W., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4176 · Cited by 1,159
The ecology of Acidobacteria: moving beyond genes and genomes
Kielak, A. M., Barreto, C. C., Kowalchuk, G. A., van Veen, J. A., & Kuramae, E. E. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00744 · Cited by 1,033
Metadata
- Authors
- DeAngelis, K. M., Brodie, E. L., DeSantis, T. Z., Andersen, G. L., Lindow, S. E., & Firestone, M. K.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-11-13
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-178
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2169202644
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 13.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective progressive response of soil microbial community to wild oat roots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2008.103
- The paper
- DeAngelis, K. M., Brodie, E. L., DeSantis, T. Z., Andersen, G. L., Lindow, S. E., & Firestone, M. K. (2009). Selective progressive response of soil microbial community to wild oat roots. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
