The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fitness and stability of obligate cross-feeding interactions that emerge upon gene loss in bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Cross-feeding interactions, in which bacterial cells exchange costly metabolites to the benefit of both interacting partners, are very common in the microbial world. However, it generally remains unclear what maintains this type of interaction in the presence of non-cooperating types. We investigate this problem using synthetic cross-feeding interactions: by simply deleting two metabolic genes from the genome of Escherichia coli, we generated genotypes that require amino acids to grow and release other amino acids into the environment. Surprisingly, in a vast majority of cases, cocultures of two cross-feeding strains showed an increased Darwinian fitness (that is, rate of growth) relative to prototrophic wild type cells—even in direct competition. This unexpected growth advantage was due to a division of metabolic labour: the fitness cost of overproducing amino acids was less than the benefit of not having to produce others when they were provided by their partner. Moreover, frequency-dependent selection maintained cross-feeding consortia and limited exploitation by non-cooperating competitors. Together, our synthetic study approach reveals ecological principles that can help explain the widespread occurrence of obligate metabolic cross-feeding interactions in nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Construction of Escherichia coli K‐12 in‐frame, single‐gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection
Baba, T., Ara, T., Hasegawa, M., Takai, Y., Okumura, Y., Baba, M., Datsenko, K. A., Tomita, M., Wanner, B. L., & Mori, H. (2006) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100050 · Cited by 7,858
Bacterial Adaptation through Loss of Function
Hottes, A. K., Freddolino, L., Khare, A., Donnell, Z. N., Liu, J. C., & Tavazoie, S. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003617 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Modifying and reacting to the environmental pH can drive bacterial interactions
Ratzke, C., & Gore, J. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004248 · Cited by 455
Metabolic cross-feeding via intercellular nanotubes among bacteria
Pande, S., Shitut, S., Freund, L., Westermann, M., Bertels, F., Colesie, C., Bischofs, I. B., & Kost, C. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7238 · Cited by 273
Self-citationLiang, Y., Ma, A., & Zhuang, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.829717 · Cited by 146
A Latex Metabolite Benefits Plant Fitness under Root Herbivore Attack
Huber, M., Epping, J., Schulze Gronover, C., Fricke, J., Aziz, Z., Brillatz, T., Swyers, M., Köllner, T. G., Vogel, H., Hammerbacher, A., et al. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002332 · Cited by 97
Systems Biology of Lactic Acid Bacteria: For Food and Thought
Teusink, B., & Molenaar, D. (2017) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2017.07.005 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Pande, S., Merker, H., Bohl, K., Reichelt, M., Schuster, S., de Figueiredo, L. F., Kaleta, C., & Kost, C.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-11-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 953-962
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2078779451
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fitness and stability of obligate cross-feeding interactions that emerge upon gene loss in bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2013.211
- The paper
- Pande, S., Merker, H., Bohl, K., Reichelt, M., Schuster, S., de Figueiredo, L. F., Kaleta, C., & Kost, C. (2014). Fitness and stability of obligate cross-feeding interactions that emerge upon gene loss in bacteria. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.