Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gut microbiome composition and function in experimental colitis during active disease and treatment-induced remission

Open access
Rooks, Michelle G, Veiga, Patrick, Wardwell-Scott, Leslie H, Tickle, Timothy, Segata, Nicola, Michaud, Monia, Gallini, Carey Ann, Beal, Chloé, van Hylckama-Vlieg, Johan E T, Ballal, Sonia A, Morgan, Xochitl C, Glickman, Jonathan N, Gevers, Dirk, Huttenhower, Curtis, Garrett, Wendy S·2014·The ISME Journal

Abstract

Dysregulated immune responses to gut microbes are central to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and gut microbial activity can fuel chronic inflammation. Examining how IBD-directed therapies influence gut microbiomes may identify microbial community features integral to mitigating disease and maintaining health. However, IBD patients often receive multiple treatments during disease flares, confounding such analyses. Preclinical models of IBD with well-defined disease courses and opportunities for controlled treatment exposures provide a valuable solution. Here, we surveyed the gut microbiome of the T-bet −/− Rag2 −/− mouse model of colitis during active disease and treatment-induced remission. Microbial features modified among these conditions included altered potential for carbohydrate and energy metabolism and bacterial pathogenesis, specifically cell motility and signal transduction pathways. We also observed an increased capacity for xenobiotics metabolism, including benzoate degradation, a pathway linking host adrenergic stress with enhanced bacterial virulence, and found decreased levels of fecal dopamine in active colitis. When transferred to gnotobiotic mice, gut microbiomes from mice with active disease versus treatment-induced remission elicited varying degrees of colitis. Thus, our study provides insight into specific microbial clades and pathways associated with health, active disease and treatment interventions in a mouse model of colitis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ismej.2014.3

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Rooks, M. G., Veiga, P., Wardwell-Scott, L. H., Tickle, T., Segata, N., Michaud, M., Gallini, C. A., Beal, C., van Hylckama-Vlieg, J. E. T., Ballal, S. A., Morgan, X. C., Glickman, J. N., Gevers, D., Huttenhower, C., & Garrett, W. S.
Venue
The ISME Journal
Published
2014-02-06
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
1403-1417
ISSN
  • 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7370
OpenAlex
W2082471133
Cited by
389
References
14
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gut microbiome composition and function in experimental colitis during active disease and treatment-induced remission. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2014.3
The paper
Rooks, M. G., Veiga, P., Wardwell-Scott, L. H., Tickle, T., Segata, N., Michaud, M., Gallini, C. A., Beal, C., van Hylckama-Vlieg, J. E. T., Ballal, S. A., Morgan, X. C., Glickman, J. N., Gevers, D., Huttenhower, C., & Garrett, W. S. (2014). Gut microbiome composition and function in experimental colitis during active disease and treatment-induced remission. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.