The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of resistance breeding in common bean on rhizosphere microbiome composition and function
Open accessAbstract
The rhizosphere microbiome has a key role in plant growth and health, providing a first line of defense against root infections by soil-borne pathogens. Here, we investigated the composition and metabolic potential of the rhizobacterial community of different common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars with variable levels of resistance to the fungal root pathogen Fusarium oxysporum (Fox). For the different bean cultivars grown in two soils with contrasting physicochemical properties and microbial diversity, rhizobacterial abundance was positively correlated with Fox resistance. Pseudomonadaceae, bacillaceae, solibacteraceae and cytophagaceae were more abundant in the rhizosphere of the Fox-resistant cultivar. Network analyses showed a modular topology of the rhizosphere microbiome of the Fox-resistant cultivar, suggesting a more complex and highly connected bacterial community than in the rhizosphere of the Fox-susceptible cultivar. Metagenome analyses further revealed that specific functional traits such as protein secretion systems and biosynthesis genes of antifungal phenazines and rhamnolipids were more abundant in the rhizobacterial community of the Fox-resistant cultivar. Our findings suggest that breeding for Fox resistance in common bean may have co-selected for other unknown plant traits that support a higher abundance of specific beneficial bacterial families in the rhizosphere with functional traits that reinforce the first line of defense.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies
Magoč, T., & Salzberg, S. L. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 · Cited by 15,366
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 · Cited by 11,675
Klindworth, A., Pruesse, E., Schweer, T., Peplies, J., Quast, C., Horn, M., & Glöckner, F. O. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks808 · Cited by 8,850
Borgatti, S. P. (2005) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008 · Cited by 3,191
Cited by
Climate change impacts on plant pathogens, food security and paths forward
Singh, B. K., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Egidi, E., Guirado, E., Leach, J. E., Liu, H., & Trivedi, P. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-023-00900-7 · Cited by 1,334
Bakker, P. A. H. M., Pieterse, C. M. J., de Jonge, R., & Berendsen, R. L. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.024 · Cited by 601
Disease-induced changes in plant microbiome assembly and functional adaptation
Gao, M., Xiong, C., Gao, C., Tsui, C. K. M., Wang, M.-M., Zhou, X., Zhang, A.-M., & Cai, L. (2021) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-021-01138-2 · Cited by 478
Ikeda-Ohtsubo, W., Brugman, S., Warden, C. H., Rebel, J. M. J., Folkerts, G., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2018.00090 · Cited by 115
Liao, H., Li, Y., & Yao, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01361 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendes, L. W., Raaijmakers, J. M., de Hollander, M., Mendes, R., & Tsai, S. M.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-10-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 212-224
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2738359482
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 22.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of resistance breeding in common bean on rhizosphere microbiome composition and function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2017.158
- The paper
- Mendes, L. W., Raaijmakers, J. M., de Hollander, M., Mendes, R., & Tsai, S. M. (2018). Influence of resistance breeding in common bean on rhizosphere microbiome composition and function. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
