The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mediators of Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction and Formation of Vasogenic Brain Edema
Open accessAbstract
The characteristics and mechanisms enabling the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to maintain the milieu of the brain have been reviewed in detail elsewhere (Banks and Kastin, 1987; Bradbury, 1985; Crone, 1986a, 1987; Cornford, 1985; Davson, 1976; Er misch et aI. , 1985; Fenstermacher, 1985; Gjedde, 1983; Goldstein and Betz, 1986; Meisenberg and Simmons, 1983; Oldendorf, 1974; Pardridge, 1983; Rapoport, 1976a; Rapoport and Robinson, 1986). Before discussing the possible role of mediators in BBB opening some pertinent aspects of the BBB will be discussed briefly. The morphological substrate of the BBB in cere bral vessels is the continuous layer of endothelial cells with junctions and no or minimal vesic ular transport. The functional characteristics of BBB are the same as of tight epithelium such as (a) low diffusional permeability for water-soluble compounds, (b) low hydraulic conductivity, (c) high reflection coefficient, and (d) high electrical resis tance. All these parameters are indicative of low diffusional exchange of water-soluble solutes. As well as by the restricted diffusion the penetration of several mediators is also inhibited by an enzymatic degradation at the endothelial border. Although li pophilic compounds can easily cross the BBB by simple diffusion, the trans cellular transport of hy drophilic solutes is made possible by facilitated dif fusion and active transport. All these mechanisms permit a highly selective exchange between blood and brain and provide an optimally controlled ho-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review lecture. The blood‐brain barrier.
Davson, H. (1976) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011267 · Cited by 219
Cited by
From blood–brain barrier to blood–brain interface: new opportunities for CNS drug delivery
Banks, W. A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2015.21 · Cited by 1,204
Başkaya, M. K., Muralikrishna Rao, A., Doğan, A., Donaldson, D., & Dempsey, R. J. (1997) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00239-5 · Cited by 332
Chatzipanteli, K., Alonso, O. F., Kraydieh, S., & Dietrich, W. D. (2000) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200003000-00012 · Cited by 193
Drug delivery to the brain in Alzheimer's disease: Consideration of the blood–brain barrier
Banks, W. A. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.12.005 · Cited by 184
Butt, A. M., & Jones, H. C. (1992) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(92)90374-i · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Wahl, M., Unterberg, A., Baethmann, A., & Schilling, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 621-634
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2325067607
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.