The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tumor Recurrence 5 Years after Treatment of Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
For most cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas (nonmelanoma skin cancers [NMSC]) data are insufficient to permit evidence-based choices among treatments. To compare tumor recurrence after treatments, we conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with primary NMSC treated with the most common treatments in two practices in 1999–2000. Recurrence was determined from medical records by observers blinded to treatment type. 24.3% of tumors (N=361) were treated with destruction with electrodessication / curettage, 38.3% (N=571) with excision, and 37.4% (N=556) with histologically-guided serial excision (Mohs surgery). Follow-up was available for 1174 patients with 1488 tumors (93.8%) at median 7.4 years; overall 5-year tumor recurrence rate [95% Confidence Interval] was 3.3% [2.3, 4.4]. Unadjusted recurrence rates did not differ after treatments: 4.9% [2.3, 7.4] after destruction, 3.5% [1.8, 5.2] after excision, and 2.1% [0.6, 3.5] after Mohs surgery (P=0.26), and no difference was seen after adjustment for risk factors. In tumors treated only with excision or Mohs surgery, the hazard of recurrence was not significantly different, even after adjustment for propensity for treatment with Mohs surgery. These data indicate that common treatments for NMSC were at least 95% effective, and further studies are needed to guide therapeutic choices for different clinical subgroups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI
Fitzpatrick, T. B. (1988) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008 · Cited by 4,339
Skin cancers after organ transplantation
Euvrard, S., Kanitakis, J., & Claudy, A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra022137 · Cited by 1,575
Cited by
Confocal Imaging–Guided Laser Ablation of Basal Cell Carcinomas: An Ex Vivo Study
Sierra, H., Cordova, M., Chen, C.-S. J., & Rajadhyaksha, M. (2015) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2014.371 · Cited by 1,703
Stratigos, A. J., Garbe, C., Dessinioti, C., Lebbe, C., Bataille, V., Bastholt, L., Dreno, B., Concetta Fargnoli, M., Forsea, A. M., Frenard, C., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.008 · Cited by 319
Lansbury, L., Bath-Hextall, F., Perkins, W., Stanton, W., & Leonardi-Bee, J. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f6153 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Chren, M.-M., Linos, E., Torres, J. S., Stuart, S. E., Parvataneni, R., & Boscardin, W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Investigative Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1188-1196
- ISSN
- 0022-202X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037660872
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumor Recurrence 5 Years after Treatment of Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/jid.2012.403
- The paper
- Chren, M.-M., Linos, E., Torres, J. S., Stuart, S. E., Parvataneni, R., & Boscardin, W. J. (2013). Tumor Recurrence 5 Years after Treatment of Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2012.403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.