Cited by 38Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersSkin Protection and Aging

Skin under the (Spot)-Light: Cross-Talk with the Central Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis

Open access
Jozic, Ivan, Stojadinovic, Olivera, Kirsner, Robert S.F., Tomic-Canic, Marjana·2015·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

UV radiation is among the most prevalent stressors in humans and diurnal rodents, exerting direct and indirect DNA damage, free-radical production, and interaction with specific chromophores that affects numerous biological processes. In addition to its panoply of effects, UVB (290-320 nm) radiation can specifically affect various local neuroendocrine activities by stimulating the expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), urocortin, proopiomelanocortin (POMC), and POMC-derived peptides. Although very little is known about the interplay between the central hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the skin HPA axis analog, in the current issue Skobowiat and Slominski propose a novel mechanism by which exposure to UVB activates a local HPA axis in skin, which in turn activates the central HPA axis, with the requirement of a functional pituitary gland. This is the first evidence of the local HPA axis in skin contributing to the central neuroendocrine response. This raises intriguing possibilities regarding how local production of cortisol and other HPA axis molecules in skin influence overall systemic levels of cortisol and help regulate local and central HPA axes in the context of homeostasis, skin injury, and inflammatory skin disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jid.2015.56

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jozic, I., Stojadinovic, O., Kirsner, R. S. F., & Tomic-Canic, M.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
135
Issue
6
Pages
1469-1471
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115752042
Cited by
38
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
UV-B radiation, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, skin, corticotropin-releasing factor, urocortin, proopiomelanocortin, cortisol, neuroendocrine response, stress, skin damage, inflammatory skin diseases, homeostasis
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Skin, Ultraviolet Rays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review