The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Normalization of urinary biomarkers to creatinine during changes in glomerular filtration rate
Open accessAbstract
Urinary biomarkers, such as albumin and other markers of kidney injury, are frequently reported as a normalized ratio to urinary creatinine (UCr) concentration [UCr] to control for variations in urine flow rate. The implicit assumption is that UCr excretion is constant across and within individuals, such that changes in the ratio will reflect changes in biomarker excretion. Using computer simulations of creatinine kinetics, we found that normalized levels of a biomarker reflecting tubular injury can be influenced by dynamic changes in the UCr excretion rate when the glomerular filtration rate changes. Actual timed urine collections from hospitalized patients with changing glomerular filtration rates and/or critical illness exhibited variability in UCr excretion rates across and within individuals. Normalization by [UCr] may, therefore, result in an underestimation or overestimation of the biomarker excretion rate depending on the clinical context. Lower creatinine excretion in the setting of acute kidney injury or poor renal allograft function may amplify a tubular injury biomarker signal, thereby increasing its clinical utility. The variability of creatinine excretion, however, will complicate the determination of a threshold value for normalized biomarkers of acute or chronic kidney disease, including albumin. Thus, we suggest that the most accurate method to quantify biomarkers requires the collection of timed urine specimens to estimate the actual excretion rate, provided that the biomarker is stable over the period of collection. This ideal must be balanced, however, against practical considerations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hsu, J., Johansen, K. L., Hsu, C.-Y., Kaysen, G. A., & Chertow, G. M. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.00090108 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Erdbrügger, U., Blijdorp, C. J., Bijnsdorp, I. V., Borràs, F. E., Burger, D., Bussolati, B., Byrd, J. B., Clayton, A., Dear, J. W., Falcón‐Pérez, J. M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12093 · Cited by 404
de Oliveira Vilar Neto, J., da Silva, C. A., Meneses, G. C., Pinto, D. V., Brito, L. C., da Cruz Fonseca, S. G., de Sousa Alves, R., Martins, A. M. C., de Oliveira Assumpção, C., & De Francesco Daher, E. (2020) · Toxicology Research · doi:10.1093/toxres/tfaa028 · Cited by 11
Masoud, A. A., Li, Z., Deyhle, M. R., Siegler, J., Specht, J., McKenna, Z. J., Mermier, C., & Amorim, F. (2025) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-025-05850-x · Cited by 6
Biofluid GPNMB/osteoactivin as a potential biomarker of ageing: A cross-sectional study
Liu, Y.-Y., Pang, J., Zhang, C., Zeng, L.-T., Wang, Y., Wang, S.-B., Fan, G.-Q., Zhang, L.-Q., Shen, T., Li, X.-F., et al. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36574 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Waikar, S. S., Sabbisetti, V. S., & Bonventre, J. V.
- Venue
- Kidney International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 486-494
- ISSN
- 0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086432763
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normalization of urinary biomarkers to creatinine during changes in glomerular filtration rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ki.2010.165
- The paper
- Waikar, S. S., Sabbisetti, V. S., & Bonventre, J. V. (2010). Normalization of urinary biomarkers to creatinine during changes in glomerular filtration rate. Kidney International. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.