Cited by 649Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDialysis and Renal Disease Management

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Lipid Management in CKD: summary of recommendation statements and clinical approach to the patient

Wanner, Christoph, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Lipid Guideline Development Work Group Members, Tonelli, Marcello·2014·Kidney International

Abstract

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) organization developed clinical practice guidelines on lipid management for all adults and children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Thirteen recommendations were obtained from the available evidence outlining a three-step management including assessment in all, treatment in many, and follow-up measurements in few. A key element is the recommendation of statin or statin/ezetimibe treatment in adults aged ⩾50 years with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) but not treated with chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation. In dialysis patients, the magnitude of any relative reduction in risk appears to be substantially smaller than in earlier stages of CKD and initiation of statin treatment is not recommended for most prevalent hemodialysis patients. In the past, clinical practice guidelines suggested the use of targets for LDL cholesterol, which require repeated measurements. Treatment escalation with higher doses of statin would be a consequence when LDL cholesterol targets are not met. The KDIGO Work Group did not recommend this strategy because higher doses of statins have not been proven to be safe in the setting of CKD. Since LDL cholesterol levels do not necessarily suggest the need to increase statin doses, follow-up measurement of lipid levels is not recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ki.2014.31

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wanner, C., the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Lipid Guideline Development Work Group Members, & Tonelli, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Wanner, Christoph
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
1303-1309
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978239396
Cited by
649
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
37.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
lipid control, chronic kidney disease, statins, ezetimibe, LDL cholesterol targets, statin dose escalation, hemodialysis, estimated glomerular filtration rate, cardiovascular risk reduction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Hypolipidemic Agents, Child, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Lipids, Middle Aged, Nephrology, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Dyslipidemias, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review