Cited by 106Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Guidelines for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
Kelsey, Michelle D., Nelson, Adam J., Green, Jennifer B., Granger, Christopher B., Peterson, Eric D., McGuire, Darren K., Pagidipati, Neha J.·2022·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These high-risk patients benefit from aggressive risk factor management, with blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol treatment, glycemic control, kidney protection, and lifestyle intervention. There are several recommendation and guideline documents across cardiology, endocrinology, nephrology, and general medicine professional societies from the United States and Europe with recommendations for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Although there are some noteworthy differences, particularly in risk stratification, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and blood pressure treatment targets, and the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, overall there is considerable alignment across recommendations from different professional societies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.046

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sattar N, Rawshani A, Franzén S, et al. Age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and associ- ations with cardiovascular and mortality risks. Circulation. 2019;139:2228-2237.
  2. Truman BI, Smith-Akin CK, Hinman AR, et al. Developing the guide to community preventive services-overview and rationale. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:18-26.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelsey, M. D., Nelson, A. J., Green, J. B., Granger, C. B., Peterson, E. D., McGuire, D. K., & Pagidipati, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Parkland Health & Hospital System (US)
Corresponding author
Kelsey, Michelle D.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
79
Issue
18
Pages
1849-1857
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225270796
Cited by
106
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 6
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk reduction, cardiovascular disease, glycemic control, renal protection, lifestyle intervention, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, risk stratification, professional society recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review