Cited by 419Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesBreast Lesions and CarcinomasBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Classification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy

Open access
Schnitt, Stuart J·2010·Modern Pathology

Abstract

For many years, patient age, axillary lymph node status, tumor size, histological features (especially histological grade and lymphovascular invasion), hormone receptor status, and HER2 status have been the major factors used to categorize patients with breast cancer in order to assess prognosis and determine the appropriate therapy. These factors are most often viewed in combination to group patients into various risk categories. Although these risk categories are useful for assessing prognosis and risk in groups of patients with breast cancer, their role in determining prognosis and evaluating risk in an individual patient is more limited. Therefore, better methods are required to help assess prognosis and determine the most appropriate treatment for patients on an individual basis. Recently, various molecular techniques, particular gene expression profiling, have been increasingly used to help refine breast cancer classification and to assess prognosis and response to therapy. Although the precise role of these newer techniques in the daily management of patients with breast cancer continues to evolve, it is clear that they have the potential to provide value above and beyond that provided by the traditional clinical and pathological prognostic and predictive factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/modpathol.2010.33

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schnitt, S. J.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Schnitt, Stuart J
Venue
Modern Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
23
Pages
S60-S64
ISSN
0893-3952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967186439
Cited by
419
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
invasive breast cancer, breast cancer classification, prognosis, molecular taxonomy, gene expression profiling, risk stratification, histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, hormone receptor status, HER2 status, predictive biomarkers, personalized treatment
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Prognosis, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review