Cited by 59Genetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry in conjunction with mismatch repair status predicts survival in patients with colorectal cancer

Open access
Toon, Christopher W, Chou, Angela, DeSilva, Keshani, Chan, Joseph, Patterson, Jillian, Clarkson, Adele, Sioson, Loretta, Jankova, Lucy +1 more·2014·Modern Pathology

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry has recently been validated for the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation across a range of tumor types. In colorectal carcinoma, the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation can be used to virtually exclude Lynch syndrome in mismatch repair-deficient tumors. In mismatch repair-proficient tumors, BRAFV600E mutation assessed by molecular methods has been proposed as a poor prognostic factor. We investigated whether combined BRAFV600E and mismatch repair status assessment by immunohistochemistry alone can be used as a prognostic marker in the routine clinical setting. We performed immunohistochemistry for BRAFV600E, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 on 1426 consecutive unselected colorectal carcinomas. Ninety-one (6.4%) carcinomas were mismatch repair-proficient and BRAFV600E mutant, and these tumors demonstrated a significantly worse 5-year survival of 49.7% compared with mismatch repair-proficient BRAF wild type (74.1% of tumors, 65.4% survival), mismatch repair-deficient BRAFV600E mutant (12.9% of tumors, 70.1% survival), and mismatch repair-deficient BRAF wild type (6.6% of tumors, 73.6% survival). The poor survival was confirmed by univariate analysis (P<0.01) but fell away in multivariate analysis (P=0.68) because of the strong effect of tumor stage and age on overall survival. We conclude that in addition to its utility in screening for Lynch syndrome, reflex BRAFV600E and mismatch repair assessment by immunohistochemistry can be used as a powerful predictor of all-cause survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/modpathol.2013.200

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • dMMR/BRAFV600E-negative tumors exhibit improved overall survival compared to dMMR/BRAFV600E-positive and proficient MMR/BRAFV600E-negative or proficient MMR/BRAFV600E-positive tumors.

    “Despite growing evidence indicating that dMMR/BRAFV600E(−) tumors exhibit improved overall survival (OS) compared to dMMR/BRAFV600E(+) and proficient MMR (pMMR)/BRAFV600E(−) or pMMR/BRAFV600E(+) tumors [49,51]”
  • The presence of the BRAFV600E mutation predicts an unfavorable prognosis in right-sided microsatellite stable colorectal cancer and undervalued effects of systemic treatment regardless of targeted therapy use.

    “Specifically, the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation predicts an unfavorable prognosis in right-sided microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC and undervalued effects of systemic treatment regardless of the use of targeted therapy [49].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toon, C. W., Chou, A., DeSilva, K., Chan, J., Patterson, J., Clarkson, A., Sioson, L., Jankova, L., & Gill, A. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
  • Royal North Shore Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Gill, Anthony J
Venue
Modern Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
644-650
ISSN
0893-3952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124101136
Cited by
59
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Pathology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
BRAF V600E mutation, mismatch repair deficiency, colorectal cancer, Lynch syndrome screening, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, prognostic factors, overall survival, immunohistochemistry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Colorectal Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Microsatellite Instability, DNA Mismatch Repair, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review