Cited by 39Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Systems biology in human health and disease

Open access
Lemberger, Thomas·2007·Molecular Systems Biology

Abstract

Editorial25 September 2007Open Access Systems biology in human health and disease Thomas Lemberger Thomas Lemberger European Molecular Biology Organization, Heidelberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Thomas Lemberger Thomas Lemberger European Molecular Biology Organization, Heidelberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Author Information Thomas Lemberger1 1European Molecular Biology Organization, Heidelberg, Germany Molecular Systems Biology (2007)3:136https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100175 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions Figures & Info Understanding the factors that influence human health and cause diseases has always been one of the major driving forces of biological research. With the spectacular progresses in quantitative techniques, large-scale measurement methods and with the intimate integration between experimental and computational approaches, Biology has recently acquired new technological and conceptual tools to investigate, model and understand living organisms at the system level. While the still young discipline of Systems Biology has been most widely devoted to the study of well-characterized model organisms, it has been clear since the early days of the human genome project that applications of system-wide approaches to human biology would open up tremendous opportunities in medicine. Recent lessons learned from Systems Biology, when applied to simple organisms like bacteria or yeast, prefigure the kind of insights that will benefit both basic medical research and clinical applications: deeper understanding of the genotype–phenotype relationship; impact of the interactions between environmental conditions and genotype; novel mechanistic and functional insights based on global unbiased approaches; elaboration of powerful predictive models capturing the intricacies of physiological states. Advances on these various fronts obviously depend on different types of research, ranging from investigations on fundamental aspects of human biology to the more clinically oriented applications. Significantly, as techniques and concepts mature, a new discipline is emerging at the interface between Medicine and Systems Biology. To provide a snapshot of this evolving field of Systems Medicine and to illustrate new insights gained by applying Systems Biology approaches within the context of human health and disease, Molecular Systems Biology releases this month, in print, a collection of articles recently published in the journal. In many fields relevant to medical research, including cancer biology, deciphering the mechanisms of disease requires a deep knowledge of how signaling transduction pathways operate. Quantitative proteomics has made possible the simultaneous monitoring of the concurrent activity of multiple signaling molecules, enabling a broader and unbiased view of cellular signaling events. The work by White and co-workers (Wolf-Yadlin et al, 2006) illustrates how this type of high-throughput data can be correlated to biological response (e.g., proliferation and cell migration) to further our understanding of one of the major pathways known to be deregulated in cancer. These global approaches also reveal the inescapable fact that biological pathways are highly interconnected, which represents one of the major motivations for adopting a system-level approach in biology. In the study by Lehár et al (2007), the impact of connectivity on biological outcome is analyzed to explain synergies and other non-intuitive interactions observed between simultaneously applied drugs, with important consequences for drug design and pharmacology. In fact, the classical concept of linear pathways is being increasingly challenged by network representations, which emphasize the importance of interactions between components of a biological system. Loscalzo et al (2007) discuss how this network-based conceptual framework may transform current paradigms in disease classification and treatment. However, a major practical challenge is how to deduce the structure of complex networks that underlie biological processes and how to characterize their state when perturbed by disease. New computational strategies combined with the now well-established genome-wide expression profiling techniques provide completely new tools to reverse-engineer network structure and to identify and track mediators associated with a disease as illustrated by the work of Jim Collins' team on prostate cancer (Ergün et al, 2007). Since the completion of the human genome sequence, research in human genetics has been progressing at a rapid pace. With major achievements including realization of the HapMap project facilitating the analysis of human genetic variability, the recent flurry of genome-wide associated studies providing a host of potential genetic determinants for major common diseases and the advent of the first personalized human genome seq

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/msb4100175

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lemberger, T.
Affiliations
European Molecular Biology Organization (DE)
Corresponding author
Lemberger, Thomas
Venue
Molecular Systems Biology
Published
2007-09-25
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
136-136
ISSN
1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095372497
Cited by
39
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Systems Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
systems biology, systems medicine, human health and disease, quantitative proteomics, tumor biology, genotype-phenotype correlation, environmental interaction, high-throughput data integration, disease mechanisms, personalized medicine, biomarkers, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Cell Physiological Phenomena, Disease, Health, Humans, Signal Transduction, Genomics, Biomedical Research, Proteomics, Systems Biology, Gene Regulatory Networks, Metabolic Networks and Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review