The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a theory of biological robustness
Open accessAbstract
Mol Syst Biol. 3: 137 Robustness is one of the fundamental characteristics of biological systems. Numerous reports have been published on how robustness is involved in various biological processes and on mechanisms that give rise to robustness in living systems (Savageau, 1985a, 1985b, 1998; Barkai and Leibler, 1997; Alon et al , 1999; von Dassow et al , 2000; Bhalla and Iyengar, 2001; Csete and Doyle, 2002, 2004; Kitano et al , 2004, 2004a, 2004b; Stelling et al , 2004; Kitano and Oda, 2006; Kitano, 2007a). With increasing interest in systems biology, properties at the system level such as robustness have attracted serious scientific research. Nevertheless, a mathematical foundation that provides a unified perspective on robustness is yet to be established. For systems biology to mature into a solid scientific discipline, there must be a solid theoretical and methodological foundation. Often, systems biology is equated with computer simulation of cells and organs. Although computer simulation is a powerful technique for clarifying the complex dynamics of biological systems, it is also a useful tool for exploring the foundation of biological systems. While investigation on the dynamic properties of specific aspects of organisms is scientifically significant and can be widely applied, it is a study on specific instances of design within a design space that is shaped by fundamental principles, structural, environmental, and evolutionary constraints. The scientific goal of systems biology is not merely to create precision models of cells and organs, but also to discover fundamental and structural principles behind biological systems that define the possible design space of life (Figure 1). The value of understanding fundamental and structural theories is that they provide deeper insights into the governing principles that complex evolvable systems including biological …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution and the Theory of Games
Smith, J. M. (1988) · Did Darwin Get It Right? · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7862-4_22 · Cited by 7,906
Evolution and the Theory of Games
Smith, J. M. (1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806292 · Cited by 6,922
Exploring the Metabolic and Genetic Control of Gene Expression on a Genomic Scale
DeRisi, J. L., Iyer, V. R., & Brown, P. O. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.680 · Cited by 4,456
Zhou, K. (1998) · Cited by 3,824
Network analysis and feedback amplifier design
Bode, H. W. (1945) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 3,119
Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch
Balaban, N. Q., Merrin, J., Chait, R., Kowalik, L., & Leibler, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099390 · Cited by 2,952 · cited 2×
“Numerous reports have been published on how robustness is involved in various biological processes and on mechanisms that give rise to robustness in living systems”
BackgroundInfluentialKitano, H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1471 · Cited by 2,278
Self-citationRobustness in simple biochemical networks
Barkai, N., & Leibler, S. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43199 · Cited by 1,513
CANNON, W. B. (1932) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/00000441-193212000-00028 · Cited by 1,258
Reverse engineering of biological complexity
Csete, M. E., & Doyle, J. C. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069981 · Cited by 1,215
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Martins NC, Dahleh MA, Elia N (2004) Stabilization of uncertain systems in the presence of a stochastic digital link. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Nassau: IEEE
- Reynolds D, Carlson JM, Doyle J (2002) Design degree of freedom and mechanisms for complexity. Phys Rev E: 016108
- Savageau MA (1985a) Mathematics of organizationally complex systems. Biomed Biochim Acta 44: 839–844
Cited by
Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery
Hopkins, A. L. (2008) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.118 · Cited by 4,622
Network biology concepts in complex disease comorbidities
Hu, J. X., Thomas, C. E., & Brunak, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.87 · Cited by 328
System-wide molecular evidence for phenotypic buffering in Arabidopsis
Fu, J., Keurentjes, J. J. B., Bouwmeester, H., America, T., Verstappen, F. W. A., Ward, J. L., Beale, M. H., de Vos, R. C. H., Dijkstra, M., Scheltema, R. A., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.308 · Cited by 265
A complex systems approach to aging biology
Cohen, A. A., Ferrucci, L., Fülöp, T., Gravel, D., Hao, N., Kriete, A., Levine, M. E., Lipsitz, L. A., Olde Rikkert, M. G. M., Rutenberg, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-022-00252-6 · Cited by 221
Sloppiness, robustness, and evolvability in systems biology
Daniels, B. C., Chen, Y.-J., Sethna, J. P., Gutenkunst, R. N., & Myers, C. R. (2008) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2008.06.008 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Kitano, H.
- Venue
- Molecular Systems Biology
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-137
- ISSN
- 1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979833590
- Cited by
- 803
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 17.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a theory of biological robustness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/msb4100179
- The paper
- Kitano, H. (2007). Towards a theory of biological robustness. Molecular Systems Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.