Cited by 2,278Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisEvolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy and History of Science

Biological robustness

Kitano, Hiroaki·2004·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

Robustness is a ubiquitously observed property of biological systems. It is considered to be a fundamental feature of complex evolvable systems. It is attained by several underlying principles that are universal to both biological organisms and sophisticated engineering systems. Robustness facilitates evolvability and robust traits are often selected by evolution. Such a mutually beneficial process is made possible by specific architectural features observed in robust systems. But there are trade-offs between robustness, fragility, performance and resource demands, which explain system behaviour, including the patterns of failure. Insights into inherent properties of robust systems will provide us with a better understanding of complex diseases and a guiding principle for therapy design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg1471

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resilience differs from flexibility, agility, and robustness.

    “In this function, resilience differs from related constructs such as flexibility, agility or robustness.”

    From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Kitano 2004

  • Robustness may exist in a system despite a lack of robustness in its components, and biology abounds in this type of consistency.

    “Robustness may exist in a system despite a lack of robustness in its components, and biology abounds in this type of consistency (Kitano 2004).”

    From Religion as a Complex and Dynamic System (2013) · cites this paper as Kitano 2004

  • SCC detection has been shown to be a powerful approach for subsystem identification, unraveling the presence of nested organizations.

    “It is worth to mention that SCC detection has been shown as a powerful approach for subsystem identification [15, 42, 43] unraveling the presence of nested organizations.”

    From On the origins of hierarchy in complex networks (2013) · cites this paper as [42]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitano, H.
Affiliations
Systems Biology Institute (JP)
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2004-11
Volume
5
Issue
11
Pages
826-837
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2296679604
Cited by
2,278
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 155 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 139 · 2015: 109 · 2014: 141 · 2013: 116 · 2012: 117
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • SICE Annual Conference (SICE) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
biological robustness, evolvability, system architecture, failure patterns, complex diseases, therapy design
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Animals, Disease, Feedback, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review