Cited by 220scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric

Open access
Callaway, Ewen·2016·Nature

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature.2016.20224

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Today, JIF is often misused due to a misinterpretation of its meaning, as it has become a standard tool in virtually all evaluation practices at all levels, usually without proper considerations of the rationale for its use.

    “However, today, JIF is often misused due to a misinterpretation of its meaning, as it has become a standard tool in virtually all evaluation practices at all levels, usually without proper considerations of the rationale for its use [2,44,222,224-227].”
  • In 2016, ASM declared that JIFs will no longer be posted to ASM journal websites or used in advertising.

    “in 2016, the American Society of Microbiology (ASM) declared that JIFs will no longer be posted to the ASM journal websites or used in advertising [226].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Callaway, E.
Corresponding author
Callaway, Ewen
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-07-08
Volume
535
Issue
7611
Pages
210-211
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2473748898
Cited by
220
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 9
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
impact factor, journal impact factor, scholarly publishing, research evaluation, scientific journals, journal editors, bibliometric analysis
MeSH terms
Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Journal Impact Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review