Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A very energetic supernova associated with the γ-ray burst of 29 March 2003

Open access
Hjorth, Jens, Sollerman, Jesper, Møller, Palle, Fynbo, Johan P. U., Woosley, Stan E., Kouveliotou, Chryssa, Tanvir, Nial R., Greiner, Jochen, Andersen, Michael I., Castro-Tirado, Alberto J., Castro Cerón, José María, Fruchter, Andrew S., Gorosabel, Javier, Jakobsson, Páll, Kaper, Lex, Klose, Sylvio, Masetti, Nicola, Pedersen, Holger, Pedersen, Kristian, Pian, Elena, Palazzi, Eliana, Rhoads, James E., Rol, Evert, van den Heuvel, Edward P. J., Vreeswijk, Paul M., Watson, Darach, Wijers, Ralph A. M. J.·2003·Nature

Abstract

Over the past five years evidence has mounted that long-duration (>2 s) γ-ray bursts (GRBs)—the most luminous of all astronomical explosions—signal the collapse of massive stars in our Universe. This evidence was originally based on the probable association of one unusual GRB with a supernova, but now includes the association of GRBs with regions of massive star formation in distant galaxies, the appearance of supernova-like ‘bumps’ in the optical afterglow light curves of several bursts and lines of freshly synthesized elements in the spectra of a few X-ray afterglows. These observations support, but do not yet conclusively demonstrate, the idea that long-duration GRBs are associated with the deaths of massive stars, presumably arising from core collapse. Here we report evidence that a very energetic supernova (a hypernova) was temporally and spatially coincident with a GRB at redshift z = 0.1685. The timing of the supernova indicates that it exploded within a few days of the GRB, strongly suggesting that core-collapse events can give rise to GRBs, thereby favouring the ‘collapsar’ model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature01750

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,498

Metadata

Authors
Hjorth, J., Sollerman, J., Møller, P., Fynbo, J. P. U., Woosley, S. E., Kouveliotou, C., Tanvir, N. R., Greiner, J., Andersen, M. I., Castro-Tirado, A. J., Castro Cerón, J. M., Fruchter, A. S., Gorosabel, J., Jakobsson, P., Kaper, L., Klose, S., Masetti, N., Pedersen, H., Pedersen, K., Pian, E., Palazzi, E., Rhoads, J. E., Rol, E., van den Heuvel, E. P. J., Vreeswijk, P. M., Watson, D., & Wijers, R. A. M. J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2003-06-19
Volume
423
Issue
6942
Pages
847-850
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2114800671
Cited by
1,498
References
1
FWCI
84.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A very energetic supernova associated with the γ-ray burst of 29 March 2003. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature01750
The paper
Hjorth, J., Sollerman, J., Møller, P., Fynbo, J. P. U., Woosley, S. E., Kouveliotou, C., Tanvir, N. R., Greiner, J., Andersen, M. I., Castro-Tirado, A. J., Castro Cerón, J. M., Fruchter, A. S., Gorosabel, J., Jakobsson, P., Kaper, L., Klose, S., Masetti, N., Pedersen, H., Pedersen, K., . . . Wijers, R. A. M. J. (2003). A very energetic supernova associated with the γ-ray burst of 29 March 2003. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01750

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.