Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A gravitationally lensed quasar with quadruple images separated by 14.62 arcseconds

Open access
Inada, Naohisa, Oguri, Masamune, Pindor, Bartosz, Hennawi, Joseph F., Chiu, Kuenley, Zheng, Wei, Ichikawa, Shin-Ichi, Gregg, Michael D., Becker, Robert H., Suto, Yasushi, Strauss, Michael A., Turner, Edwin L., Keeton, Charles R., Annis, James, Castander, Francisco J., Eisenstein, Daniel J., Frieman, Joshua A., Fukugita, Masataka, Gunn, James E., Johnston, David E., Kent, Stephen M., Nichol, Robert C., Richards, Gordon T., Rix, Hans-Walter, Sheldon, Erin Scott, Bahcall, Neta A., Brinkmann, J., Ivezić, Željko, Lamb, Don Q., McKay, Timothy A., Schneider, Donald P., York, Donald G.·2003·Nature

Abstract

Gravitational lensing is a powerful tool for the study of the distribution of dark matter in the Universe. The cold-dark-matter model of the formation of large-scale structures (that is, clusters of galaxies and even larger assemblies) predicts the existence of quasars gravitationally lensed by concentrations of dark matter so massive that the quasar images would be split by over 7 arcsec. Numerous searches for large-separation lensed quasars have, however, been unsuccessful. All of the roughly 70 lensed quasars known, including the first lensed quasar discovered, have smaller separations that can be explained in terms of galaxy-scale concentrations of baryonic matter. Although gravitationally lensed galaxies with large separations are known, quasars are more useful cosmological probes because of the simplicity of the resulting lens systems. Here we report the discovery of a lensed quasar, SDSS J1004 + 4112, which has a maximum separation between the components of 14.62 arcsec. Such a large separation means that the lensing object must be dominated by dark matter. Our results are fully consistent with theoretical expectations based on the cold-dark-matter model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature02153

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Inada, N., Oguri, M., Pindor, B., Hennawi, J. F., Chiu, K., Zheng, W., Ichikawa, S.-I., Gregg, M. D., Becker, R. H., Suto, Y., Strauss, M. A., Turner, E. L., Keeton, C. R., Annis, J., Castander, F. J., Eisenstein, D. J., Frieman, J. A., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., Johnston, D. E., Kent, S. M., Nichol, R. C., Richards, G. T., Rix, H.-W., Sheldon, E. S., Bahcall, N. A., Brinkmann, J., Ivezić, Ž., Lamb, D. Q., McKay, T. A., Schneider, D. P., & York, D. G.
Venue
Nature
Published
2003-12
Volume
426
Issue
6968
Pages
810-812
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1987312959
Cited by
210
References
4
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A gravitationally lensed quasar with quadruple images separated by 14.62 arcseconds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature02153
The paper
Inada, N., Oguri, M., Pindor, B., Hennawi, J. F., Chiu, K., Zheng, W., Ichikawa, S.-I., Gregg, M. D., Becker, R. H., Suto, Y., Strauss, M. A., Turner, E. L., Keeton, C. R., Annis, J., Castander, F. J., Eisenstein, D. J., Frieman, J. A., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., . . . York, D. G. (2003). A gravitationally lensed quasar with quadruple images separated by 14.62 arcseconds. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02153

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.