The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EFFICIENT PHOTOMETRIC SELECTION OF QUASARS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. ∼1, 000, 000 QUASARS FROM DATA RELEASE 6
Open accessAbstract
We present a catalog of 1,172,157 quasar candidates selected from the photometric imaging data of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The objects are all point sources to a limiting magnitude of i = 21.3 from 8417 deg 2 of imaging from SDSS Data Release 6 (DR6). This sample extends our previous catalog by using the latest SDSS public release data and probing both ultraviolet (UV)-excess and high-redshift quasars. While the addition of high-redshift candidates reduces the overall efficiency (quasars:quasar candidates) of the catalog to ∼80%, it is expected to contain no fewer than 850,000 bona fide quasars, which is ∼8 times the number of our previous sample and ∼10 times the size of the largest spectroscopic quasar catalog. Cross-matching between our photometric catalog and spectroscopic quasar catalogs from both the SDSS and 2dF survey yields 88,879 spectroscopically confirmed quasars. For judicious selection of the most robust UV-excess sources (∼500, 000 objects in all), the efficiency is nearly 97%—more than sufficient for detailed statistical analyses. The catalog's completeness to type 1 (broad-line) quasars is expected to be no worse than 70%, with most missing objects occurring at z < 0.7 and 2.5 < z < 3.0. In addition to classification information, we provide photometric redshift estimates (typically good to Δ z ± 0.3 [2σ]) and cross-matching with radio, X-ray, and proper-motion catalogs. Finally, we consider the catalog's utility for determining the optical luminosity function of quasars and are able to confirm the flattening of the bright-end slope of the quasar luminosity function at z ∼ 4 as compared to z ∼ 2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5638 · Cited by 17,933
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., Bakken, J. A., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 10,366
Self-citationDensity Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
(1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · Cited by 8,525
Unified Models for Active Galactic Nuclei and Quasars
Antonucci, R. (1993) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353 · Cited by 3,943
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
Self-citationBayes, T. (1763) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1763.0053 · Cited by 2,995
The FIRST Survey: Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty Centimeters
Becker, R. H., White, R. L., & Helfand, D. J. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176166 · Cited by 2,911
Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Early Data Release
Stoughton, C., Lupton, R. H., Bernardi, M., Blanton, M. R., Burles, S., Castander, F. J., Connolly, A. J., Eisenstein, D. J., Frieman, J. A., Hennessy, G. S., et al. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/324741 · Cited by 2,390
Self-citation
Cited by
Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Ly α forest of BOSS DR11 quasars
Delubac, T., Bautista, J. E., Busca, N. G., Rich, J., Kirkby, D., Bailey, S., Font-Ribera, A., Slosar, A., Lee, K.-G., Pieri, M. M., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423969 · Cited by 895
Self-citationData mining and machine learning in astronomy
BALL, N. M., & BRUNNER, R. J. (2010) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271810017160 · Cited by 383
Self-citationConstraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianity from 800 000 Photometric Quasars
Leistedt, B., Peiris, H. V., & Roth, N. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.221301 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, G. T., Myers, A. D., Gray, A. G., Riegel, R. N., Nichol, R. C., Brunner, R. J., Szalay, A. S., Schneider, D. P., & Anderson, S. F.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2008-12-23
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-83
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2147529393
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 16.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFFICIENT PHOTOMETRIC SELECTION OF QUASARS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. ∼1, 000, 000 QUASARS FROM DATA RELEASE 6. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/67
- The paper
- Richards, G. T., Myers, A. D., Gray, A. G., Riegel, R. N., Nichol, R. C., Brunner, R. J., Szalay, A. S., Schneider, D. P., & Anderson, S. F. (2009). EFFICIENT PHOTOMETRIC SELECTION OF QUASARS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. ∼1, 000, 000 QUASARS FROM DATA RELEASE 6. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/67
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.