Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EFFICIENT PHOTOMETRIC SELECTION OF QUASARS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. ∼1, 000, 000 QUASARS FROM DATA RELEASE 6

Open access
Richards, Gordon T., Myers, Adam D., Gray, Alexander G., Riegel, Ryan N., Nichol, Robert C., Brunner, Robert J., Szalay, Alexander S., Schneider, Donald P., Anderson, Scott F.·2009·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We present a catalog of 1,172,157 quasar candidates selected from the photometric imaging data of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The objects are all point sources to a limiting magnitude of i = 21.3 from 8417 deg 2 of imaging from SDSS Data Release 6 (DR6). This sample extends our previous catalog by using the latest SDSS public release data and probing both ultraviolet (UV)-excess and high-redshift quasars. While the addition of high-redshift candidates reduces the overall efficiency (quasars:quasar candidates) of the catalog to ∼80%, it is expected to contain no fewer than 850,000 bona fide quasars, which is ∼8 times the number of our previous sample and ∼10 times the size of the largest spectroscopic quasar catalog. Cross-matching between our photometric catalog and spectroscopic quasar catalogs from both the SDSS and 2dF survey yields 88,879 spectroscopically confirmed quasars. For judicious selection of the most robust UV-excess sources (∼500, 000 objects in all), the efficiency is nearly 97%—more than sufficient for detailed statistical analyses. The catalog's completeness to type 1 (broad-line) quasars is expected to be no worse than 70%, with most missing objects occurring at z < 0.7 and 2.5 < z < 3.0. In addition to classification information, we provide photometric redshift estimates (typically good to Δ z ± 0.3 [2σ]) and cross-matching with radio, X-ray, and proper-motion catalogs. Finally, we consider the catalog's utility for determining the optical luminosity function of quasars and are able to confirm the flattening of the bright-end slope of the quasar luminosity function at z ∼ 4 as compared to z ∼ 2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/67

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Richards, G. T., Myers, A. D., Gray, A. G., Riegel, R. N., Nichol, R. C., Brunner, R. J., Szalay, A. S., Schneider, D. P., & Anderson, S. F.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2008-12-23
Volume
180
Issue
1
Pages
67-83
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2147529393
Cited by
346
References
88
FWCI
16.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFFICIENT PHOTOMETRIC SELECTION OF QUASARS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. ∼1, 000, 000 QUASARS FROM DATA RELEASE 6. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/67
The paper
Richards, G. T., Myers, A. D., Gray, A. G., Riegel, R. N., Nichol, R. C., Brunner, R. J., Szalay, A. S., Schneider, D. P., & Anderson, S. F. (2009). EFFICIENT PHOTOMETRIC SELECTION OF QUASARS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. ∼1, 000, 000 QUASARS FROM DATA RELEASE 6. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/67

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.