The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Audience drives male songbird response to partner's voice
Abstract
According to the social intelligence hypothesis, social context represents an important force driving the selection of animal cognitive abilities such as the capacity to estimate the nature of the social relationships between other individuals. Despite this importance, the influence of this force has been assessed only in primates and never in other animals showing social interactions. In this way, avian communication generally takes place in a network of signallers and receivers, which represents an audience altering individual signalling behaviours. Indeed, vocal amplitude and repertoire are known to be socially regulated and the attitude towards the opposite sex may change depending on the audience. This ‘audience effect’ provides support for the reality of social awareness in some bird species. However no evidence has yet been found to suggest that birds are able to estimate the characteristics of the social relationships between group-mates. Here we show that the male of a gregarious songbird species—the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata)—pays attention to the mating status of conspecific pairs, and uses this information to control its behaviour towards its female partner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour
Adolphs, R. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1056 · Cited by 1,657
Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195106237.001.0001 · Cited by 1,491
Cited by
Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms
Robinson, G. E., Grozinger, C. M., & Whitfield, C. W. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1575 · Cited by 454
Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice
Bateson, M., & Healy, S. D. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.013 · Cited by 265
Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate
Holveck, M.-J., & Riebel, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1222 · Cited by 212
Acoustic communication in crocodilians: from behaviour to brain
Vergne, A. L., Pritz, M. B., & Mathevon, N. (2009) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2009.00079.x · Cited by 151
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vignal, C., Mathevon, N., & Mottin, S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 430
- Issue
- 6998
- Pages
- 448-451
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2040498484
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Audience drives male songbird response to partner's voice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature02645
- The paper
- Vignal, C., Mathevon, N., & Mottin, S. (2004). Audience drives male songbird response to partner's voice. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02645
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.