Cited by 303Astro and Planetary SciencePlanetary Science and ExplorationStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differentiation of the asteroid Ceres as revealed by its shape

Abstract

The accretion of bodies in the asteroid belt was halted nearly 4.6 billion years ago by the gravitational influence of the newly formed giant planet Jupiter. The asteroid belt therefore preserves a record of both this earliest epoch of Solar System formation and variation of conditions within the solar nebula. Spectral features in reflected sunlight indicate that some asteroids have experienced sufficient thermal evolution to differentiate into layered structures. The second most massive asteroid--4 Vesta--has differentiated to a crust, mantle and core. 1 Ceres, the largest and most massive asteroid, has in contrast been presumed to be homogeneous, in part because of its low density, low albedo and relatively featureless visible reflectance spectrum, similar to carbonaceous meteorites that have suffered minimal thermal processing. Here we show that Ceres has a shape and smoothness indicative of a gravitationally relaxed object. Its shape is significantly less flattened than that expected for a homogeneous object, but is consistent with a central mass concentration indicative of differentiation. Possible interior configurations include water-ice-rich mantles over a rocky core.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature03938

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rivkin, A. S. Observations of Main-belt Asteroids in the 3-µm Region. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Arizona (1997)
  2. Pavlovsky, C. et al. ACS Instrument Handbook, Version 5.0 (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, 2004)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 303

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, P. C., Parker, J. W., McFadden, L. A., Russell, C. T., Stern, S. A., Sykes, M. V., & Young, E. F.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Southwest Research Institute (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Planetary Science Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Thomas, P. C.
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-09
Volume
437
Issue
7056
Pages
224-226
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2055124830
Cited by
303
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Ceres, asteroid shape, asteroid differentiation, gravitational relaxation, central mass concentration, ice mantles, rocky core, asteroid belt formation, solar nebula, thermal evolution, Vesta, asteroid albedo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review