Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,374

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum

Open access
Tribolium Genome Sequencing Consortium·2008·Nature

Abstract

Tribolium castaneum is a member of the most species-rich eukaryotic order, a powerful model organism for the study of generalized insect development, and an important pest of stored agricultural products. We describe its genome sequence here. This omnivorous beetle has evolved the ability to interact with a diverse chemical environment, as shown by large expansions in odorant and gustatory receptors, as well as P450 and other detoxification enzymes. Development in Tribolium is more representative of other insects than is Drosophila, a fact reflected in gene content and function. For example, Tribolium has retained more ancestral genes involved in cell–cell communication than Drosophila, some being expressed in the growth zone crucial for axial elongation in short-germ development. Systemic RNA interference in T. castaneum functions differently from that in Caenorhabditis elegans, but nevertheless offers similar power for the elucidation of gene function and identification of targets for selective insect control. The red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum is a common pest: a type of 'bran bug', it targets cereal products, including grain, flour and rice bran. It is also a commonly used laboratory model, combining the ease of systematic RNA interference experiments such as those used with the nematode worm C. elegans with a biology that is more representative of most insects than even Drosophila. This weeks sees the publication by the Tribolium Genome Sequencing Consortium of the genomic sequence of T. castaneum. This is the first beetle genome to be published, and it will be a valuable resource for insect development studies and pest biology. The beetle Tribolium castaneum is a commonly used laboratory model, combining the ease of systematic RNAi experiments like those in Caenorhabditis elegans, with biology that is more representative of most insects than Drosophila melanogaster. A large consortium has sequenced and analysed the genome of the red flour beetle, creating a resource for biologists everywhere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature06784

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,374

Metadata

Authors
Tribolium Genome Sequencing Consortium
Venue
Nature
Published
2008-03-23
Volume
452
Issue
7190
Pages
949-955
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2058816652
Cited by
1,374
References
1
FWCI
35.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature06784
The paper
Tribolium Genome Sequencing Consortium. (2008). The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06784

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.