The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast
Open accessAbstract
The origin of cooperation is a central challenge to our understanding of evolution. The fact that microbial interactions can be manipulated in ways that animal interactions cannot has led to a growing interest in microbial models of cooperation and competition. For the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to grow on sucrose, the disaccharide must first be hydrolysed by the enzyme invertase. This hydrolysis reaction is performed outside the cytoplasm in the periplasmic space between the plasma membrane and the cell wall. Here we demonstrate that the vast majority (∼99 per cent) of the monosaccharides created by sucrose hydrolysis diffuse away before they can be imported into the cell, serving to make invertase production and secretion a cooperative behaviour. A mutant cheater strain that does not produce invertase is able to take advantage of and invade a population of wild-type cooperator cells. However, over a wide range of conditions, the wild-type cooperator can also invade a population of cheater cells. Therefore, we observe steady-state coexistence between the two strains in well-mixed culture resulting from the fact that rare strategies outperform common strategies—the defining features of what game theorists call the snowdrift game. A model of the cooperative interaction incorporating nonlinear benefits explains the origin of this coexistence. We are able to alter the outcome of the competition by varying either the cost of cooperation or the glucose concentration in the media. Finally, we note that glucose repression of invertase expression in wild-type cells produces a strategy that is optimal for the snowdrift game—wild-type cells cooperate only when competing against cheater cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Evolution and the Theory of Games
Smith, J. M. (1988) · Did Darwin Get It Right? · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7862-4_22 · Cited by 7,906
Evolution and the Theory of Games
Smith, J. M. (1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806292 · Cited by 6,922
Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation
Nowak, M. A. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133755 · Cited by 5,894
Evolutionary games and spatial chaos
Nowak, M. A., & May, R. M. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359826a0 · Cited by 4,463
Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors
Kerr, B., Riley, M. A., Feldman, M. W., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00823 · Cited by 1,623
Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game
Hauert, C., & Doebeli, M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02360 · Cited by 1,582
The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure
Skyrms, B. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165228 · Cited by 1,524
Carlson, M., & Botstein, D. (1982) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(82)90384-1 · Cited by 1,495
Yeast Carbon Catabolite Repression
Gancedo, J. M. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.2.334-361.1998 · Cited by 1,273
Cited by
Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review
Perc, M., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Szolnoki, A., Floría, L. M., & Moreno, Y. (2013) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0997 · Cited by 1,340
Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,308
The evolution of cooperation within the gut microbiota
Rakoff-Nahoum, S., Foster, K. R., & Comstock, L. E. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17626 · Cited by 616
Prisoner’s dilemma game model Based on historical strategy information
Gou, Z., & Li, Y. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26890-9 · Cited by 561
Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure
Allen, B., Lippner, G., Chen, Y.-T., Fotouhi, B., Momeni, N., Yau, S.-T., & Nowak, M. A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21723 · Cited by 534
Metadata
- Authors
- Gore, J., Youk, H., & van Oudenaarden, A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-04-06
- Volume
- 459
- Issue
- 7244
- Pages
- 253-256
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2001615843
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 119.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature07921
- The paper
- Gore, J., Youk, H., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2009). Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07921
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.