The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability
Open accessAbstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of many tumours and correlates with the presence of extra centrosomes. However, a direct mechanistic link between extra centrosomes and CIN has not been established. It has been proposed that extra centrosomes generate CIN by promoting multipolar anaphase, a highly abnormal division that produces three or more aneuploid daughter cells. Here we use long-term live-cell imaging to demonstrate that cells with multiple centrosomes rarely undergo multipolar cell divisions, and the progeny of these divisions are typically inviable. Thus, multipolar divisions cannot explain observed rates of CIN. In contrast, we observe that CIN cells with extra centrosomes routinely undergo bipolar cell divisions, but display a significantly increased frequency of lagging chromosomes during anaphase. To define the mechanism underlying this mitotic defect, we generated cells that differ only in their centrosome number. We demonstrate that extra centrosomes alone are sufficient to promote chromosome missegregation during bipolar cell division. These segregation errors are a consequence of cells passing through a transient ‘multipolar spindle intermediate’ in which merotelic kinetochore–microtubule attachment errors accumulate before centrosome clustering and anaphase. These findings provide a direct mechanistic link between extra centrosomes and CIN, two common characteristics of solid tumours. We propose that this mechanism may be a common underlying cause of CIN in human cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nowell, P. C. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.959840 · Cited by 6,471
Gascoigne, K. E., & Taylor, S. S. (2008) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2008.07.002 · Cited by 832
Cited by
The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution
Burrell, R. A., McGranahan, N., Bartek, J., & Swanton, C. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12625 · Cited by 2,262
DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis
Crasta, K., Ganem, N. J., Dagher, R., Lantermann, A. B., Ivanova, E. V., Pan, Y., Nezi, L., Protopopov, A., Chowdhury, D., & Pellman, D. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10802 · Cited by 1,227
Self-citationThe evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers
Gerstung, M., Jolly, C., Leshchiner, I., Dentro, S. C., Gonzalez, S., Rosebrock, D., Mitchell, T. J., Rubanova, Y., Anur, P., Yu, K., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1907-7 · Cited by 1,057
Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis
Holland, A. J., & Cleveland, D. W. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2718 · Cited by 859
Stein, S., Ott, M. G., Schultze-Strasser, S., Jauch, A., Burwinkel, B., Kinner, A., Schmidt, M., Krämer, A., Schwäble, J., Glimm, H., et al. (2010) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2088 · Cited by 716
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganem, N. J., Godinho, S. A., & Pellman, D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-06-07
- Volume
- 460
- Issue
- 7252
- Pages
- 278-282
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2134590240
- Cited by
- 1,422
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 42.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature08136
- The paper
- Ganem, N. J., Godinho, S. A., & Pellman, D. (2009). A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.