The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TCR–peptide–MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity
Open accessAbstract
The recognition of foreign antigens by T lymphocytes is essential to most adaptive immune responses. It is driven by specific T-cell antigen receptors (TCRs) binding to antigenic peptide–major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules on other cells. If productive, these interactions promote the formation of an immunological synapse. Here we show that synaptic TCR–pMHC binding dynamics differ significantly from TCR–pMHC binding in solution. We used single-molecule microscopy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between fluorescently tagged TCRs and their cognate pMHC ligands to measure the kinetics of TCR–pMHC binding in situ. When compared with solution measurements, the dissociation of this complex was increased significantly (4–12-fold). Disruption of actin polymers reversed this effect, indicating that cytoskeletal dynamics destabilize this interaction directly or indirectly. Nevertheless, TCR affinity for pMHC was significantly elevated as the result of a large (about 100-fold) increase in the association rate, a likely consequence of complementary molecular orientation and clustering. In helper T cells, the CD4 molecule has been proposed to bind cooperatively with the TCR to the same pMHC complex. However, CD4 blockade had no effect on the synaptic TCR affinity, nor did it destabilize TCR–pMHC complexes, indicating that the TCR binds pMHC independently of CD4.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses
Kato, H., Takeuchi, O., Sato, S., Yoneyama, M., Yamamoto, M., Matsui, K., Uematsu, S., Jung, A., Kawai, T., Ishii, K. J., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04734 · Cited by 3,888
Seth, R. B., Sun, L., Ea, C.-K., & Chen, Z. J. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.012 · Cited by 3,329
IPS-1, an adaptor triggering RIG-I- and Mda5-mediated type I interferon induction
Kawai, T., Takahashi, K., Sato, S., Coban, C., Kumar, H., Kato, H., Ishii, K. J., Takeuchi, O., & Akira, S. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1243 · Cited by 2,562
Cardif is an adaptor protein in the RIG-I antiviral pathway and is targeted by hepatitis C virus
Meylan, E., Curran, J., Hofmann, K., Moradpour, D., Binder, M., Bartenschlager, R., & Tschopp, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04193 · Cited by 2,401
RIG-I-mediated antiviral responses to single-stranded RNA bearing 5’-phosphates
Pichlmair, A., Schulz, O., Tan, C. P., Näslund, T. I., Liljeström, P., Weber, F., & Reis e Sousa, C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132998 · Cited by 2,210
Nucleic acid recognition by the innate immune system
Barbalat, R., Ewald, S. E., Mouchess, M. L., & Barton, G. M. (2011) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101340 · Cited by 577
RIGorous Detection: Exposing Virus Through RNA Sensing
Rehwinkel, J., & Reis e Sousa, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185068 · Cited by 163
The prion hypothesis: from biological anomaly to basic regulatory mechanism
Tuite, M. F., & Serio, T. R. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3007 · Cited by 146
Cited by
T cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is a primary target for PD-1–mediated inhibition
Hui, E., Cheung, J., Zhu, J., Su, X., Taylor, M. J., Wallweber, H. A., Sasmal, D. K., Huang, J., Kim, J. M., Mellman, I., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1292 · Cited by 1,689
CD4 and CD8 binding to MHC molecules primarily acts to enhance Lck delivery
Artyomov, M. N., Lis, M., Devadas, S., Davis, M. M., & Chakraborty, A. K. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010568107 · Cited by 207
Self-citationPD‐1 suppresses TCR‐CD8 cooperativity during T‐cell antigen recognition
Li, K., Yuan, Z., Lyu, J., Ahn, E., Davis, S. J., Ahmed, R., & Zhu, C. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22965-9 · Cited by 81
Organizing MHC Class II presentation
Fooksman, D. R. (2014) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00158 · Cited by 41
Engineering of synthetic cellular microenvironments: Implications for immunity
Adutler-Lieber, S., Zaretsky, I., Platzman, I., Deeg, J., Friedman, N., Spatz, J. P., & Geiger, B. (2014) · Journal of Autoimmunity · doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2014.05.003 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Huppa, J. B., Axmann, M., Mörtelmaier, M. A., Lillemeier, B. F., Newell, E. W., Brameshuber, M., Klein, L. O., Schütz, G. J., & Davis, M. M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 463
- Issue
- 7283
- Pages
- 963-967
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1964823826
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
