Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complete Khoisan and Bantu genomes from southern Africa

Open access
Schuster, Stephan C., Miller, Webb, Ratan, Aakrosh, Tomsho, Lynn P., Giardine, Belinda, Kasson, Lindsay R., Harris, Robert S., Petersen, Desiree C., Zhao, Fangqing, Qi, Ji, Alkan, Can, Kidd, Jeffrey M., Sun, Yazhou, Drautz, Daniela I., Bouffard, Pascal, Muzny, Donna M., Reid, Jeffrey G., Nazareth, Lynne V., Wang, Qingyu, Burhans, Richard, Riemer, Cathy, Wittekindt, Nicola E., Moorjani, Priya, Tindall, Elizabeth A., Danko, Charles G., Teo, Wee Siang, Buboltz, Anne M., Zhang, Zhenhai, Ma, Qianyi, Oosthuysen, Arno, Steenkamp, Abraham W., Oostuisen, Hermann, Venter, Philippus, Gajewski, John, Zhang, Yu, Pugh, B. Franklin, Makova, Kateryna D., Nekrutenko, Anton, Mardis, Elaine R., Patterson, Nick, Pringle, Tom H., Chiaromonte, Francesca, Mullikin, James C., Eichler, Evan E., Hardison, Ross C., Gibbs, Richard A., Harkins, Timothy T., Hayes, Vanessa M.·2010·Nature

Abstract

The complete genome sequences of an indigenous hunter-gatherer from Namibia's Kalahari Desert and of a Bantu from South Africa are presented in this issue, together with protein-coding regions from three other hunter-gatherer groups from the Kalahari. Analysis of genetic variance in what is probably the oldest known modern human lineage will contribute to understanding human diversity, and facilitate the inclusion of southern Africans in medical genomics research projects. Initial observations from the data include the fact that the Bushmen seem more different from each other, in terms of nucleotide substitutions, than typical Asians and Europeans. More speculatively, variants between these genomes and the existing data sets may point to genetic adaptations for an agricultural lifestyle. Until now, fully sequenced human genomes of the indigenous hunter-gatherer peoples of southern Africa have been limited to recently diverged populations. The complete genome sequences of an indigenous hunter-gatherer from the Kalahari Desert and of a Bantu from southern Africa are now presented. The extent of whole-genome and exome diversity is characterized; the observed genomic differences may help to pinpoint genetic adaptations to an agricultural lifestyle. The genetic structure of the indigenous hunter-gatherer peoples of southern Africa, the oldest known lineage of modern human, is important for understanding human diversity. Studies based on mitochondrial1 and small sets of nuclear markers2 have shown that these hunter-gatherers, known as Khoisan, San, or Bushmen, are genetically divergent from other humans1,3. However, until now, fully sequenced human genomes have been limited to recently diverged populations4,5,6,7,8. Here we present the complete genome sequences of an indigenous hunter-gatherer from the Kalahari Desert and a Bantu from southern Africa, as well as protein-coding regions from an additional three hunter-gatherers from disparate regions of the Kalahari. We characterize the extent of whole-genome and exome diversity among the five men, reporting 1.3 million novel DNA differences genome-wide, including 13,146 novel amino acid variants. In terms of nucleotide substitutions, the Bushmen seem to be, on average, more different from each other than, for example, a European and an Asian. Observed genomic differences between the hunter-gatherers and others may help to pinpoint genetic adaptations to an agricultural lifestyle. Adding the described variants to current databases will facilitate inclusion of southern Africans in medical research efforts, particularly when family and medical histories can be correlated with genome-wide data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08795

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Schuster, S. C., Miller, W., Ratan, A., Tomsho, L. P., Giardine, B., Kasson, L. R., Harris, R. S., Petersen, D. C., Zhao, F., Qi, J., Alkan, C., Kidd, J. M., Sun, Y., Drautz, D. I., Bouffard, P., Muzny, D. M., Reid, J. G., Nazareth, L. V., Wang, Q., Burhans, R., Riemer, C., Wittekindt, N. E., Moorjani, P., Tindall, E. A., Danko, C. G., Teo, W. S., Buboltz, A. M., Zhang, Z., Ma, Q., Oosthuysen, A., Steenkamp, A. W., Oostuisen, H., Venter, P., Gajewski, J., Zhang, Y., Pugh, B. F., Makova, K. D., Nekrutenko, A., Mardis, E. R., Patterson, N., Pringle, T. H., Chiaromonte, F., Mullikin, J. C., Eichler, E. E., Hardison, R. C., Gibbs, R. A., Harkins, T. T., & Hayes, V. M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2010-02
Volume
463
Issue
7283
Pages
943-947
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2091151261
Cited by
499
References
12
FWCI
36.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complete Khoisan and Bantu genomes from southern Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature08795
The paper
Schuster, S. C., Miller, W., Ratan, A., Tomsho, L. P., Giardine, B., Kasson, L. R., Harris, R. S., Petersen, D. C., Zhao, F., Qi, J., Alkan, C., Kidd, J. M., Sun, Y., Drautz, D. I., Bouffard, P., Muzny, D. M., Reid, J. G., Nazareth, L. V., Wang, Q., . . . Hayes, V. M. (2010). Complete Khoisan and Bantu genomes from southern Africa. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08795

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.