The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of two evolutionarily conserved genes regulating processing of engulfed apoptotic cells
Open accessAbstract
Engulfment of apoptotic cells occurs throughout life in multicellular organisms. Impaired apoptotic cell clearance (due to defective recognition, internalization or degradation) results in autoimmune disease. One fundamental challenge in understanding how defects in corpse removal translate into diseased states is the identification of critical components orchestrating the different stages of engulfment. Here we use genetic, cell biological and molecular studies in Caenorhabditis elegans and mammalian cells to identify SAND-1 and its partner CCZ-1 as new factors in corpse removal. In worms deficient in either sand-1 or ccz-1, apoptotic cells are internalized and the phagosomes recruit the small GTPase RAB-5 but fail to progress to the subsequent RAB-7(+) stage. The mammalian orthologues of SAND-1, namely Mon1a and Mon1b, were similarly required for phagosome maturation. Mechanistically, Mon1 interacts with GTP-bound Rab5, identifying Mon1 as a previously unrecognized Rab5 effector. Moreover, a Mon1–Ccz1 complex (but not either protein alone) could bind Rab7 and could also influence Rab7 activation, suggesting Mon1–Ccz1 as an important link in progression from the Rab5-positive stage to the Rab7-positive stage of phagosome maturation. Taken together, these data identify SAND-1 (Mon1) and CCZ-1 (Ccz1) as critical and evolutionarily conserved components regulating the processing of ingested apoptotic cell corpses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rabs and their effectors: achieving specificity in membrane traffic
Grosshans, B. L., Ortiz, D., & Novick, P. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601617103 · Cited by 1,005
A pathway for phagosome maturation during engulfment of apoptotic cells
Kinchen, J. M., Doukoumetzidis, K., Almendinger, J., Stergiou, L., Tosello-Trampont, A., Sifri, C. D., Hengartner, M. O., & Ravichandran, K. S. (2008) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1718 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Cited by
Network organization of the human autophagy system
Behrends, C., Sowa, M. E., Gygi, S. P., & Harper, J. W. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09204 · Cited by 1,554
Clearing the Dead: Apoptotic Cell Sensing, Recognition, Engulfment, and Digestion
Hochreiter-Hufford, A., & Ravichandran, K. S. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a008748 · Cited by 503
Self-citationRab GTPase Function in Endosome and Lysosome Biogenesis
Langemeyer, L., Fröhlich, F., & Ungermann, C. (2018) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2018.06.007 · Cited by 394
The Dynamics of Apoptotic Cell Clearance
Elliott, M. R., & Ravichandran, K. S. (2016) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.029 · Cited by 319
Self-citationEfferocytosis Is an Innate Antibacterial Mechanism
Martin, C. J., Booty, M. G., Rosebrock, T. R., Nunes-Alves, C., Desjardins, D. M., Keren, I., Fortune, S. M., Remold, H. G., & Behar, S. M. (2012) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2012.06.010 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinchen, J. M., & Ravichandran, K. S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-03-21
- Volume
- 464
- Issue
- 7289
- Pages
- 778-782
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2070461863
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of two evolutionarily conserved genes regulating processing of engulfed apoptotic cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature08853
- The paper
- Kinchen, J. M., & Ravichandran, K. S. (2010). Identification of two evolutionarily conserved genes regulating processing of engulfed apoptotic cells. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.